Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm absolutely terrified. If infowars says it, it must be true.![]()
Idiot
I neither know nor care. It's out of all proportion.
A few years ago, a different Muslim radical group bombed the underground and murdered dozens of people. What makes you think they won't do it again, but worse the next time?![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings
There are probably more Muslims in England than in the US, and a higher percentage who are fanatics.
Tell you what. The minute I'm blown up or beheaded or in any way harmed by ISIS, I'll post a public retraction on this thread and admit how very wrong I was.
Right now I feel more threatened by my own government than ISIS.
I understand percentages, too. 1 member of the public killed by terrorism since 2005. And that was a Muslim stabbed by a mad Ukrainian racist.
I know the Arsenal loss was bad, but really?
I understand percentages, too. 1 member of the public killed by terrorism since 2005. And that was a Muslim stabbed by a mad Ukrainian racist.
I said a member of the public. He was an army officer. Of course it was disgusting and despicable and I hope the people who did it rot in jail, but we can't redefine the army as ordinary citizens. That's the basis of the whole Geneva Convention.
Was he in uniform?
So you are also saying, cops are fair game as well?
Or soldiers on the streets?
You are grotesque
It's your side that calls it a 'War on Terror' and that the usual rules of warfare don't apply. Not me. Or did you think disregarding the normal rules of warfar only worked one way?
I think it's disgusting and cowardly to kill an unarmed man or woman. On the streets of London, or in Pakistan, or Yemen, at the Paris Hebdo offices, in Afghanistan or in New York. I'm not the one being inconsistent here.
It's your side that calls it a 'War on Terror' and that the usual rules of warfare don't apply. Not me. Or did you think disregarding the normal rules of warfar only worked one way?
I think it's disgusting and cowardly to kill an unarmed man or woman. On the streets of London, or in Pakistan, or Yemen, at the Paris Hebdo offices, in Afghanistan or in New York. I'm not the one being inconsistent here.
I certainly hope you are not implying the "rules of warfare" apply in the battle against Islamic terrorists, such as ISIS or Bolo Haram or others. They are nothing but murders, rapists and slavers, but they commit these atrocities in the name of their religion.
no, what he means is we should give up and they should win