ISIS threatens to attack London

I'm absolutely terrified. If infowars says it, it must be true. :rolleyes:
 

Tell you what. The minute I'm blown up or beheaded or in any way harmed by ISIS, I'll post a public retraction on this thread and admit how very wrong I was.

Right now I feel more threatened by my own government than ISIS.
 
A few years ago, a different Muslim radical group bombed the underground and murdered dozens of people. What makes you think they won't do it again, but worse the next time? :confused:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings

There are probably more Muslims in England than in the US, and a higher percentage who are fanatics.

I understand percentages, too. 1 member of the public killed by terrorism since 2005. And that was a Muslim stabbed by a mad Ukrainian racist.
 
Tell you what. The minute I'm blown up or beheaded or in any way harmed by ISIS, I'll post a public retraction on this thread and admit how very wrong I was.

Right now I feel more threatened by my own government than ISIS.

So the issue is you, not your country and fellow citizens?

You are a pos
 
I understand percentages, too. 1 member of the public killed by terrorism since 2005. And that was a Muslim stabbed by a mad Ukrainian racist.

You forget Drummer Rigby? Or was he a racist piece of shit?

Your MI5 said in 2113 that 34 terror attacks were stopped.....YOU REALLY ARE BENEATH CONTEMPT
 
I said a member of the public. He was an army officer. Of course it was disgusting and despicable and I hope the people who did it rot in jail, but we can't redefine the army as ordinary citizens. That's the basis of the whole Geneva Convention.
 
I said a member of the public. He was an army officer. Of course it was disgusting and despicable and I hope the people who did it rot in jail, but we can't redefine the army as ordinary citizens. That's the basis of the whole Geneva Convention.

Was he in uniform?:mad:

So you are also saying, cops are fair game as well?

Or soldiers on the streets?

You are grotesque
 
Was he in uniform?:mad:

So you are also saying, cops are fair game as well?

Or soldiers on the streets?

You are grotesque

It's your side that calls it a 'War on Terror' and that the usual rules of warfare don't apply. Not me. Or did you think disregarding the normal rules of warfar only worked one way?

I think it's disgusting and cowardly to kill an unarmed man or woman. On the streets of London, or in Pakistan, or Yemen, at the Paris Hebdo offices, in Afghanistan or in New York. I'm not the one being inconsistent here.
 
Oh yes

One day

We Just decided to have a war on terror. ....out of the blue
 
It's your side that calls it a 'War on Terror' and that the usual rules of warfare don't apply. Not me. Or did you think disregarding the normal rules of warfar only worked one way?

I think it's disgusting and cowardly to kill an unarmed man or woman. On the streets of London, or in Pakistan, or Yemen, at the Paris Hebdo offices, in Afghanistan or in New York. I'm not the one being inconsistent here.

my side?

who is MY side?


YOU are even MORE dangerous then are teh MUSLIMS
 
It's your side that calls it a 'War on Terror' and that the usual rules of warfare don't apply. Not me. Or did you think disregarding the normal rules of warfar only worked one way?

I think it's disgusting and cowardly to kill an unarmed man or woman. On the streets of London, or in Pakistan, or Yemen, at the Paris Hebdo offices, in Afghanistan or in New York. I'm not the one being inconsistent here.

I certainly hope you are not implying the "rules of warfare" apply in the battle against Islamic terrorists, such as ISIS or Bolo Haram or others. They are nothing but murders, rapists and slavers, but they commit these atrocities in the name of their religion.
 
I certainly hope you are not implying the "rules of warfare" apply in the battle against Islamic terrorists, such as ISIS or Bolo Haram or others. They are nothing but murders, rapists and slavers, but they commit these atrocities in the name of their religion.

no, what he means is we should give up and they should win
 
no, what he means is we should give up and they should win

Absolutely not. We are already letting them win by changing ourselves. Cut the overweening security state, the stagnant patriotism and let's be what we tell the world we are - the civilized world and land of the free. Oh, and it would help if we would stop supporting dictators in the Middle East, too.

I oppose violent theocrats of all colours.
 
Back
Top