Is there any on the right left here that don’t peddle in conspiracies?

[BotanyBoy]

He's doing the best he can with his high school education...

It's hard being a beauty school drop out....

I finally told him to go fuck himself.

Can't do anything else.

 

[Rightguide]

how do you know he didn't read the report and was able to interpret it better than you?

Because like you, he's a doctrinaire leftist who isn't capable of taking a hit to his intellectual ego with the kind of violence the FISA Report would deliver. That's how.

 

[verybusy]

I don’t believe that there is a single one left here. I know they exist in the real world, but you’ll find zero evidence of that here.

Also, what happened to the latest incarnation of Shelly?

meanwhile

Dems Resurrect Russia Collusion in Announcing Articles of Impeachment

 

[RobDownSouth]

How to tell who is the "fucking loser"

When Rory embarrasses himself and then has nothing, he resorts to post counts!! LOL what a fucking loser.

• When YOU have TWICE as many posts as the next highest poster, you are TRIGGERED.
• When YOU have THREE TIMES as many posts as the next highest poster, you are having an EPIC MELTDOWN.

 

[BotanyBoy]

• When YOU have TWICE as many posts as the next highest poster, you are TRIGGERED.
• When YOU have THREE TIMES as many posts as the next highest poster, you are having an EPIC MELTDOWN.

Not at all, that's why I've been embarrassing your with your own lame attempts to get jabs in at me.

Post counts are meaningless. Unless you need them to feel better about that sad attempt to lay politicians failures at the feet of soldiers, or embarrassed about the fact that neither of you knew liberalism was a right wing political ideology, then I suppose they might have some meaning to the likes of you and Rory, but still otherwise meaningless.

 

[RoryN]

Post counts are meaningless.

Orly?

Your fellow Deplorable said you guys made a concerted effort to keep it low during Thanksgiving: http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1513695

Thanks for playing.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Not at all, that's why I've been embarrassing your with your own lame attempts to get jabs in at me.

Post counts are meaningless. Unless you need them to feel better about that sad attempt to lay politicians failures at the feet of soldiers, or embarrassed about the fact that neither of you knew liberalism was a right wing political ideology, then I suppose they might have some meaning to the likes of you and Rory, but still otherwise meaningless.

Your shitposting strategery is pretty straightforward:
1. Drown out opposing viewpoints by repetitive posting.
2. Always get the last word in.
3. Resort to Ad Hominem ("hates America", "lies", etc) and ascription ("what he/she REALLY believes is...")
4. When posters respond in kind, play the victim.
5. Repeat as necessary until condition #2 is met.

 

[bhurry]

You did, and it might have been my favorite response of the year. Nothing makes you Deplorables more angry than the truth - you demonstrated it perfectly.

I know you are tired of hearing it but here goes . She fucking lost. A deplorable,no school other than HS. Retired FF. Own my own business now. Make quite a nice living. Go to Church. help thee needy. And do not live in my parents basement

 

[Conager]

Your shitposting strategery is pretty straightforward:
1. Drown out opposing viewpoints by repetitive posting.
2. Always get the last word in.
3. Resort to Ad Hominem ("hates America", "lies", etc) and ascription ("what he/she REALLY believes is...")
4. When posters respond in kind, play the victim.
5. Repeat as necessary until condition #2 is met.

Sounds like he hurt your feelings.

Perhaps if you adequately articulate your positions you won't feel like you are being drowned out.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Orly?

Your fellow Deplorable said you guys made a concerted effort to keep it low during Thanksgiving: http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1513695

Thanks for playing.

Really.

We are not a collective, I'm an individual and they don't speak for me.
https://media.giphy.com/media/3ohzdYJK1wAdPWVk88/giphy.gif


Thanks for playing.

 

[RoryN]

they don't speak for me.

Yes, they do. Frequently. (Evidence: page 1 of this thread.)

And, when you like what they say, you allow it.

Don't bite that hand, BotBoy.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Your shitposting strategery is pretty straightforward:
1. Drown out opposing viewpoints by repetitive posting.
2. Always get the last word in.
3. Resort to Ad Hominem ("hates America", "lies", etc) and ascription ("what he/she REALLY believes is...")
4. When posters respond in kind, play the victim.
5. Repeat as necessary until condition #2 is met.

Rob makes up lies because he can't support the bullshit he posts.

Repetitive refutation isn't drowning out opposing viewpoints, it's refuting them, you can get as mad as you want about being wrong but it won't make you anymore right.

That's not what ad hominem is....and it's not ascription if it's accurate and supported by evidence.

Sounds like he hurt your feelings.

Perhaps if you adequately articulate your positions you won't feel like you are being drowned out.

He doesn't possess the courage to articulate any positions, supporting a virtue signal and then not owning it is about as close as Rob will ever come to standing up for his beliefs.

That's why he's always resorting to ascription and ad hominem.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Yes, they do.

Prove it.

Cite that evidence from page 1.

 

[RetroTin88]

You did, and it might have been my favorite response of the year. Nothing makes you Deplorables more angry than the truth - you demonstrated it perfectly.

Ok, Boomer.

 

[bigsly]

Since the IG report concluded that there was no "documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations" and that the IG "found no evidence that the FBI attempted to place any CHSs within the Trump campaign, recruit members of the Trump campaign as CHSs, or task CHSs to report on the Trump campaign” that means that the following right wing conspiracy theories are officially debunked:

- This was a politically motivated witch hunt to get Trump

- This was a coup

- Lisa Page was guilty of Treason


Regardless of what the lying shit stain-in-chief says, this report blows away more than a few of the conspiracy theories that he (and FOX news) have been pedaling.

Archived for when United States Attorney Durham's criminal investigation begins announcing indictments...

 

[DMBFFF]

...
Libertarians (which I'm not) are on the right, along with all other flavors of liberals.

Libertarians, and some liberals, support:
1. decriminalization of drugs
2. decriminalization of prostitution
3. free trade
4. open borders
5. less defense spending
6. pro-choice

traditionally, at least, positions of the left.

I figure they're more on the center.

Libertarians are a type of liberal....so that's not very shocking you made that connection.

However while both are to the left of the Christian conservatives liberalism at large is right wing, because all forms of liberalism not only allow natural hierarchy to occur but promote it.

This is antithetical to the goals of the left, which seek equity.

Hmmm,

I'm not so sure.

We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal...,

There might have been some talk among some of the slave-masters who drafted and ratified that document that the best way to insure equality is to not enforce it through artificial means—the disparity of wealth also being a creature of statist regimes. One cannot "promote" a natural hierarchy any more than one can promote free trade: one simply allows it to happen while promoting it through non-statist means (which I presume you meant). As for Christian conservatives, it it wasn't for them, as well as plutocrats who use the apparatus of state to suppress rivals and ingratiate themselves with the big spenders, and the bigots, the US wouldn't have much of a right-wing movement.

 

[BotanyBoy]

One cannot "promote" a natural hierarchy any more than one can promote free trade: one simply allows it to happen while promoting it through non-statist means (which I presume you meant).

Non-authoritarian means.

State can promote it too, promoting competitions and such but yes most promotion of natural hierarchy is socially driven not state driven.

As for Christian conservatives, it it wasn't for them, as well as plutocrats who use the apparatus of state to suppress rivals and ingratiate themselves with the big spenders, and the bigots, the US wouldn't have much of a right-wing movement.

Indeed, liberals would be the "alt-right" as they are considered by "progressives" now....and we'd almost certainly be another starving socialist shit hole.

Thank gawd for the Bill of Rights!!!! Because I sure do love my rights and private property.

 

[DMBFFF]

...
Indeed....and we'd almost certainly be another starving socialist shit hole.

and perhaps in this contention of right and left, we (i.e. those of us in Western relatively liberal democracies) might obtain some freedom for ourselves—100 flowers blooming and all of that.

 

[BotanyBoy]

and perhaps in this contention of right and left, we (i.e. those of us in Western relatively liberal democracies) might obtain some freedom for ourselves—100 flowers blooming and all of that.

You think the left is more free?

Suppose that depends on how you define freedom.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Thank gawd for the Bill of Rights!!!! Because I sure do love my rights and private property.

I was thinkin' about those rights that you glibertarian shitsludges love to crow about the other day.

Here in Houston, we had a glibertarian shitbag disciplining his wife (or "personal property" in glibertarian-speak).

Meddlesome government intervention, in the form of a Houston police officer, showed up to interfere with his slut-shaming. The glibbo, as is customary in such situations, took out his steel penis substitute and fired a shot at the officer. "Ha ha", replied the officer, "I got me a bullet proof vest!"

"Actually, it sucks to be you! I got me some second amendment guaranteed armor piercing ammo!" The meddlesome cop had a giant hole blown through his body armor and later died.

Make sure you celebrate this killer in your nightly prayers.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I was thinkin' about those rights that you glibertarian shitsludges love to crow about the other day.

Here in Houston, we had a glibertarian shitbag disciplining his wife (or "personal property" in glibertarian-speak).

Meddlesome government intervention, in the form of a Houston police officer, showed up to interfere with his slut-shaming. The glibbo, as is customary in such situations, took out his steel penis substitute and fired a shot at the officer. "Ha ha", replied the officer, "I got me a bullet proof vest!"

"Actually, it sucks to be you! I got me some second amendment guaranteed armor piercing ammo!" The meddlesome cop had a giant hole blown through his body armor and later died.

Make sure you celebrate this killer in your nightly prayers.

Oh look, Rob engages in wild dishonesty to try and justify his seething white hot hatred for liberty and individual civil rights.....super patriotic bro!!!

 

[schism666]

Oh look, Rob engages in wild dishonesty to try and justify his hatred for liberty and individual civil rights.....super patriotic bro!!!

your fakeness is not the problem here

 

[BotanyBoy]

your fakeness is not the problem here

Then why are you bringing such a lie up??

 

[DMBFFF]

You think the left is more free?

They aren't (much) more anti-freedom.

Suppose that depends on how you define freedom.

The right to do whatever you want provided you hurt no one else might be a decent working definition.




As for property rights, Aboriginals might have a few words about that.




We liberals understand that many issues tend to be complicated.

 

[Conager]

They aren't (much) more anti-freedom.


The right to do whatever you want provided you hurt no one else might be a decent working definition.




As for property rights, Aboriginals might have a few words about that.




We liberals understand that many issues tend to be complicated.

No model developed "for the greater good" developed by the left elevating the collective over the individual can function if one can "do whatever you want."