Is there a rule against questioning moderators' actions?

[SinclairGroupLLP]

My reasoning is basically a type of body dysmorphia. I don't see myself as I am in a mirror, so sometimes I take a picture to review later. If I look at it right away, I still see the distortion that's in the mirror. But a week or two later? I can see myself as I actually am in the image. It's how I track my eating disorder to make sure I'm not, you know, starving myself.

Given that we were talking about all of this in the context of a porn site, I have to admit that this kind of a use didn't immediately spring to mind. Good to know.

So climb off your high horse, stop gaslighting, and just accept there are a lot of people who are very different to you. Thankfully...

You know what would be great? If we could all treat each other like human beings, without the nonsense accusations and name calling. You know, like adults? Is that possible? Or is this some kind of kink I'm also not aware of, where you have to throw shade at somebody you don't know for having a different opinion?

 

[Saltfountain]

You know what would be great? If we could all treat each other like human beings, without the nonsense accusations and name calling. You know, like adults? Is that possible? Or is this some kind of kink I'm also not aware of, where you have to throw shade at somebody you don't know for having a different opinion?

Alanis Morissette called.

Something about copyright infringement?

 

[SinclairGroupLLP]

Alanis Morissette called.

Something about copyright infringement?

Still going. I guess you've got last-worditis, too.

Knock yourself out.

 

[Britva415]

The example of “people who take nude selfies with no intent to show them to anyone else” is a red herring.

Those aren’t the pictures which are getting passed around on the internet.

I’m not saying it’s right that some of those are pictures which escaped someone’s control, I’m just saying they aren’t examples of pictures which weren’t intended to ever be shown to anyone else.

So instead of making “pictures nobody but me was ever supposed to see” the strawman here, a better one would be “pictures nobody but the person I showed/sent them to was supposed to see.”

Of course it’s deplorable for that other person to then mis-use them. Of course it is. It’s just a different scenario than the one everyone has been talking about, where there was presumably no possible way for some third party to have opportunity to mis-use them at all.

 

[ToPleaseHim]

The example of “people who take nude selfies with no i tent to show them to anyone else” is a red herring.

Those aren’t the pictures which are getting passed around on the internet.

I’m not saying it’s right that some of those are pictures which escaped someone’s control, I’m just saying they aren’t examples of pictures which weren’t intended to ever be shown to anyone else.

So instead of making “pictures nobody but me was ever supposed to see” the strawman here, a better one would be “pictures nobody but the person I showed/sent them to was supposed to see.”

This is definitely infinitely more likely to be an issue here.

 

[Britva415]

This is definitely infinitely more likely to be an issue here.

Exactly, and the one which people have spent many hours discussing is an absolute non-issue. Here or anywhere.

Unless someone got their phone stolen or hacked or something. But nobody has allowed even that little bit of subtlety.

 

[Saltfountain]

My argument has always been that it doesn't matter that the pic was in public use.

It is against the site rules and generally accepted forum ethics to download and repost someone else's nude picture

 

[ToPleaseHim]

Exactly, and the one which people have spent many hours discussing is an absolute non-issue. Here or anywhere.

Unless someone got their phone stolen or hacked or something. But nobody has allowed even that little bit of subtlety.

Agreed. 100%.