Is the Kirk killing being used to destabilize the country?

The irony! It burns! Explain to me why I should care? Your side insists that is wrong. Is their position incorrect? Could MAGAs be WRONG about something?
 

Attachments

  • fark_fII9oQX-rFuCcVFxgPqNjexzpq8.jpg
    fark_fII9oQX-rFuCcVFxgPqNjexzpq8.jpg
    94.3 KB · Views: 3
1 shot from 200 yards by a gunman dressed in black sounds suggests a pro…except he was seen with a long gun afterwards…. and I’d guess a pro would have broken down the weapon afterwards.

My money’s on an inside job to advance more trump overreach, but who knows.
The last guy only took off an earlobe. They're improving. :)
 
Certainly attracted to the brain dead. :)

Haha.
Bray simply did what everyone does to you, but with style. But don’t get me wrong, a proverbial hammer to your head is still the most efficient way to give you a verbal beatdown. Dumbass.
 
Why all this fuss? Charlie Kirk himself said:

"We must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty... We need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. But I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment."

You should all just thank good ol' Charlie for paying the "price" and get on with your lives.
 
Back
Top