Is BusyBody a Racist?

[4est_4est_Gump]

Calling you a political bigot is just true. I'm not saying anything about your mama, she might be a fine lady.

You're defending his behavior and justifying it because you do the same thing. That's what a lot of people do to justify denigrating another group. "Oh, but mine's harmless and by the way, I'm totally RIGHT!"

You seek out and take opportunities to cast entire political groups in negative light. If you limited it to individuals, I wouldn't have that opinion about you, but you generalize in negative terms and that's the definition of bigotry.

No, you're not criminal or militant, but you are bigoted.

I go out of my way to avoid casting entire groups in one light. I'm guilty of it and I try to eliminate it from my thinking, because it's lazy and easy. Since I'm accustomed to scanning my own thoughts for that logical fallacy, I can see it in other thoughts. I have a much lower threshold of tolerance, not necessarily because every incident of bigotry is destructive to society as a whole, but because it's destructive to my own mind.

You still don't know the definitions. You are trying to say I am prejudiced.

I am. We all are. In my case, however, I happen to be passionately prejudiced against what I used to be in much the same way as a reformed smoker, converted vegan, or born-again Christian, but I will not apologize for that.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Based on

Crazed

Wretchys

Daffy nition of bigot

Her hubby

Is the perfect bigot

Okay, I am offended now.


I will take it out on somebody else.


*kicks the cat*


There, I feel better, all of a sudden.

Kick me instead.

I have a thick skin, strong back and a wide hos ass...



That ain't your mama's hoe cake half-breed!

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Kick me instead.

I have a thick skin, strong back and a wide hos ass...



That ain't your mama's hoe cake half-breed!

Naw, I think not.


I know . . .


BB is white trash.


Now I feel really good.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Naw, I think not.


I know . . .


BB is white trash.


Now I feel really good.

Typical red-neck Christian racist concerned only with his Bible, Gun and repression of women, children, minorities, and the elderly...

 

[Recidiva]

You still don't know the definitions. You are trying to say I am prejudiced.

I am. We all are. In my case, however, I happen to be passionately prejudiced against what I used to be in much the same way as a reformed smoker, converted vegan, or born-again Christian, but I will not apologize for that.

I'm not trying to say you're prejudiced. I'm saying you're prejudiced.

Yes. Yes. Okay. You don't have to apologize for it, but it won't do you any good to deny it.

I tend to inject too much humor and hyperbole into my social expression because I find it fun and it makes me enjoy my conversation more. It offends other people and they are right, it distorts my point of view. I make small adjustments when I'm aware of it, but in reality I find it to be too much fun to substantially change the way I express myself. There are times when I speak only for other people and not for myself and that's when I tamp down the filter.

If someone tells me I do that, yes, I know. I have considered it and I am aware, but altering my expression method takes all the fun out of it for me. If I had to abandon humor and you had to abandon political stereotype, we'd both have a great deal less fun and probably wouldn't post.

If someone were to start a thread saying "Does Recidiva take things too far?" I'd be in the "Hell Yeah!" category. Taking it too far.

I own it, and I justify it, but I don't deny it and I'm aware if I irk people in a social setting, I'm responsible for it, not the social setting.

I'm aware that you like political hyperbole as well, but just as I can make unjustified assertions with humor, you make unjustified assertions with your hyperbole. My humor can verge into mean, unhelpful and dark, your assertions can verge into bigotry.

We both get something out of the filters we use to communicate.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Typical red-neck Christian racist concerned only with his Bible, Gun and repression of women, children, minorities, and the elderly...

Come again?


I do nawt follow Jeebus, I'll have you know.


You left out cat-kicker.


Model A Rust-bucket Boy.

 

[RobDownSouth]

You still don't know the definitions. You are trying to say I am prejudiced.

I am. We all are. In my case, however, I happen to be passionately prejudiced against what I used to be in much the same way as a reformed smoker, converted vegan, or born-again Christian, but I will not apologize for that.

In much the same way, I will not apologize for being passionately predjudiced against what you are now.

 

[Adre]

Christ, we're still yakking about this tool

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Why does busybody do what he does?

Example:

After Vice President Joe Biden’s epic gaffe in which he suggested to a largely black audience in Virginia that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan wanted to “put y’all back in chains,” the mainstream media has been desperately seeking a way to shift the narrative. They’ve been unable to cope with the selection of Ryan, who doesn’t fit any of the preferred anti-conservative stereotypes: dumb (Bush), corrupt (Nixon), or mean (Cheney). And now they’re on the defensive about Biden’s race-baiting, too.

So the media is gearing up to do what they always do: counterattack.

The counterassault has already started, and it’s come from a supremely predictable angle: Biden isn’t the real racist, Mitt Romney is. This is an angle the left used successfully on Newt Gingrich’s brilliant “food stamp president” label for Obama. Now they’ll try to apply it to Romney. Touré tried to misdirect from Biden’s comments to Romney by stating that Romney’s ire at Biden – and particularly his line that Obama’s “angry” campaign ought to be sent back to Chicago – “niggerized” Obama, making him look like a stereotypical angry black man. Except that Obama is angry. And he’s making an ass of himself. But for Touré, Biden’s race-baiting and Obama’s rage are evidence of Romney’s racism.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/08/16/Media-Readies-Assault-on-Romney

He just shows liberals who they actually are.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Come again?


I do nawt follow Jeebus, I'll have you know.


You left out cat-kicker.


Model A Rust-bucket Boy.

No, I was describing that damned dirty Jew...

 

[Wat_Tyler]

No, I was describing that damned dirty Jew...

Which one, Jeebus or the White Trash?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Now this, this is racism...

By Canadian law, the Tahltan do not strictly own the valley. This is because their claim to it predates the existence of the Canadian state — and the government officials who conquered or negotiated treaties with most of the rest of Canada's indigenous people never came into most of what is now British Columbia (BC).

In the late 1800s, it seems, the colonial government believed that BC's "Indians" would simply give up and die out of their own racial inferiority. That didn't happen.

Therefore, in the words of anthropologist Wade Davis, "Not a single First Nation had been defeated in battle, and by legal definition none had settled with the Crown or relinquished title to their lands."[4]

So perhaps it's not surprising that the Tahltan give little credence to the paper laws by which the state has tried to give away the rights to their property.

http://mises.org/daily/6150/Respect-Indigenous-Property-Rights

 

[busybody..]

I wonder if

Wretchy sees what a

Bigot

NIGGERUD, her hubby is

I think not

Why?

Cause she is bigoted

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Which one, Jeebus or the White Trash?

That sir, is a fantastic point.

The one that killed Jeeves...

 

[Adre]

Now this, this is racism...


http://mises.org/daily/6150/Respect-Indigenous-Property-Rights

Your commissions from Mises.org must be piling up nicely

 

[Wat_Tyler]

That sir, is a fantastic point.

The one that killed Jeeves...

I had to explain that point to a Joo once, that the so-called "Lord's Prayer" was given by a practicing Joo to other Joos. So many people just don't know their history, much less anyone else's.


On that happy note, I think I'll wander off and do some errands. Stimulus is done for the week.


I will leave you to the bevy of intrawebz trolls who nip at your ankles.


I am going car shopping this afternoon, come Hell or high water. It seems some Stimulus Money is burning a hole in my pocket.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I had to explain that point to a Joo once, that the so-called "Lord's Prayer" was given by a practicing Joo to other Joos. So many people just don't know their history, much less anyone else's.


On that happy note, I think I'll wander off and do some errands. Stimulus is done for the week.


I will leave you to the bevy of intrawebz trolls who nip at your ankles.


I am going car shopping this afternoon, come Hell or high water. It seems some Stimulus Money is burning a hole in my pocket.

Knee-deep in Chihuahua scat...

 

[rosco rathbone]

I'm tempted to say "no," if only because he's called me a nigger hundreds of times.

His hate is primarily based on politics, I reckon. He's said all sorts of nice things about Rep. Allen West, the black war criminal.

In other words, "Not all colored folks is niggers. Hell, there's some whites I'd call niggers too."

 

[busybody..]

Read and Look at yourselves


INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY:Crickets Chirp When Leftist Hate Inspires Violence.



A gay activist opens fire in a conservative organization’s offices, inspired by the steady drumbeat of leftist vitriol against those who value traditional marriage, and no one says a word.

You won’t hear any call for civil discourse from President Obama’s bully pulpit over the shooting and wounding of a security guard at the offices of the conservative Family Research Council (FRC) in Washington, D.C.

The alleged shooter was a volunteer at a community center for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, and the FRC favors traditional marriage.

Those who blamed Sarah Palin for the shooting of Congresswoman Gabriel Giffords or Rush Limbaugh for the Oklahoma City bombing are strangely silent.

At least the likes of ABC’s Brian Ross didn’t reflexively blame the Tea Party, as he did after a gunman shot up an Aurora, Colo., movie theater.


I’ll bet he Googled hopefully, though.

Related: Video: CNN takes almost 3 hours to report Family Research Council shooting.

Also: Paul Rahe: How Hatred Became a Liberal Value.


olitics is generational. Consider the thuggery practiced by the Democrats recently in Wisconsin. Force, intimidation, and openly partisan, unprofessional conduct on the part of judges, civil servants, physicians, and policemen became on the part of left-liberals the order of the day, and no one on the left stood up to denounce this conduct. Now, thanks to our President’s admiration for the tactics of Saul Alinsky, others in other states are imitating the deportment of the Wisconsin left-liberals – not only heckling Republican candidates but attempting to storm the platforms on which they speak.

I remember when left-liberals insisted on civility. I remember when they condemned the tactics of intimidation championed by the New Left. I remember when progressives insisted on impartiality on the part of judges, civil servants, policemen, and those who purported to be reporting the news (as opposed to espousing opinion). There were always exceptions to the rule. Dan Rather was playing tricks as early as 1963. But, when caught and exposed, these exceptions took it on the chin. Today they rarely even apologize.

I remember when liberals sported on their automobiles bumper stickers reading, “Hatred is not a Family Value.” Then, back in 2003, in The New Republic, Jonathan Chait wrote an essay explaining why it was legitimate to hate George W. Bush, and the dam burst. Civility is no longer a liberal ideal. And now – as yesterday’s armed attack on the Family Research Council in Washington, the five-hour delay in President Obama’s condemnation of the act as he calculated whether it was in his interest to comment or not, and the mainstream media’s initial reluctance to report on the event, much less highlight the activist LGBT connections of the shooter suggest – left liberals are willing to wink at violence. It may be regrettable, they think, but, like stealing elections, it is all in a good cause – and before figuring out how to respond to an outbreak of violence on the part of their allies, they pause to calculate the political consequences. You will not hear liberals arguing for a crackdown on the use of force by animal-rights activists, environmental activists, union thugs, and the Occupy movement. Instead, you will find in them a desperate hankering to pin on the Tea Party responsibility for conduct the Tea-Partiers abhor and a willingness to engage in race-baiting and talk of class warfare on a stunning scale.

True. And pathetic

 

[Recidiva]

In other words, "Not all colored folks is niggers. Hell, there's some whites I'd call niggers too."

What surprises me is that some white males think it's politically motivated and the women and the people of ethnic diversity knowing better.

He hasn't attacked my political views anywhere near as much as he's attacked my boobs, so to speak.

 

[busybody..]

What surprises me is that some white males think it's politically motivated and the women and the people of ethnic diversity knowing better.

He hasn't attacked my political views anywhere near as much as he's attacked my boobs, so to speak.

STFU already with your BS

 

[busybody..]

I’M SURE THAT HEADLINES LIKE THIS INDICATE THAT OBAMA’S CAMPAIGN IS GOING SMOOTHLY: White House defends Biden, says remarks not racist.


But when Romney says

Obama is angry

THAT IS NIGGERIZATION

 

[busybody..]

THIS IS RACIST


Congressional Black Caucus Chairman: Uproar Over Biden’s “Chains” Remarks “Makes Absolutely No Sense”…




Speaking of making no sense . . .

Via The Hill:


The head of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) on Thursday dismissed accusations that Vice President Biden’s “chains” remark was an appeal to black voters, saying the charge “makes absolutely no sense.”

 

[busybody..]

Next time you call BB racist

Look in the mirror

You will

SEE

YOURSELF

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I’M SURE THAT HEADLINES LIKE THIS INDICATE THAT OBAMA’S CAMPAIGN IS GOING SMOOTHLY: White House defends Biden, says remarks not racist.


But when Romney says

Obama is angry

THAT IS NIGGERIZATION

THIS IS RACIST


Congressional Black Caucus Chairman: Uproar Over Biden’s “Chains” Remarks “Makes Absolutely No Sense”…




Speaking of making no sense . . .

Via The Hill:


The head of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) on Thursday dismissed accusations that Vice President Biden’s “chains” remark was an appeal to black voters, saying the charge “makes absolutely no sense.”

Next time you call BB racist

Look in the mirror

You will

SEE

YOURSELF

Quoted for the fan base...