scheherazade_79
Steamy
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2003
- Posts
- 9,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101
You know, if a government photographer had walked around Berlin in the summer of 1939, he could have taken pictures similar to these, except they would probably have been in black and white, since color film was not that common at the time.
My remark was in response to the rather rose-tinted glasses comment of Sche:
It's totally not how I'd imagined Iran, and somehow it makes the Axis of Evil label that much harder to swallow.
It probably would have been better if I'd posted this with no accompanying comments and let people draw their own conclusions. But the reason I shared was because it showed a side of Iran that the western media doesn't offer us.
It's easier to vilify a country and persuade your own people to go to war against them when you make the people of that country appear radically different (and lesser in some ways) to your own. Better still if you can portray their way of life as a grave threat to the status quo. It's the whole dichotomy of Good V. Evil, the War of Freedom against the gun-toting, effigy-burning tent-dwellers and camel-riders of the Middle East.
What I wanted to do was provide another view of a country that we know very little about.
Now if that counts as rose-tinted glasses, then so be it. But at least it provides some balance to the shit-tinted glasses that the western media forces us to view Iran through.
If you think that CNN, Fox News, the BBC and other providers of information give you the complete picture, then think again.
Remember that golden video moment when the statue of Saddam was toppled in Baghdad to what looked like vast crowds of cheering Iraqis? The point was to make us feel better about the invasion of Iraq and the huge loss of civilian life it resulted in. The little known truth is that there were only around 30-40 Iraqis present, and they'd been rounded up by the allies to play their part in this little charade.
I'm just offering a wider perspective.