Otto26
Inconsistent
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2006
- Posts
- 1,518
The idea is fairly simple: A tattoo artist uses a fine needle set for very shallow penetration. No template is applied to the skin and no ink is used. The artist free-hands the design. This creates irritation on the skin. It must be cared for as with a standard tattoo (ointment, bandage) but over the course of a couple of weeks the mark fades. The goal being to mark the person without creating a visible mark. Both of them will know the mark is there even if no one else can see it.
Now, I know Penn Gillette did this back in the late 90's (I looked it up) but that's the only reference I find. All the other references are for people doing this for deliberate scarring, not the intent.
I came up with the idea (several years after Penn) in an online discussion with a friend and I used it in a story her on Lit. Now he's talking about actually doing it. Anyone have any experience with this sort of thing? Advice? I don't want him running off and inflicting this on someone and then having it go bad. Nice guy, but a little prone to impulsiveness is my impression.
Anyway, your input is appreciated. Thank you.
Now, I know Penn Gillette did this back in the late 90's (I looked it up) but that's the only reference I find. All the other references are for people doing this for deliberate scarring, not the intent.
I came up with the idea (several years after Penn) in an online discussion with a friend and I used it in a story her on Lit. Now he's talking about actually doing it. Anyone have any experience with this sort of thing? Advice? I don't want him running off and inflicting this on someone and then having it go bad. Nice guy, but a little prone to impulsiveness is my impression.
Anyway, your input is appreciated. Thank you.