interesting.

Fuck you.

Now I have to dig out "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" again and read that tiresome tome.

So bite me dolf, bite me.
 
Scholars recently discovered the original first page of the bible. It read:

This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events and incidents are either the products of the author’s imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.
 
Scholars recently discovered the original first page of the bible. It read:

This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events and incidents are either the products of the author’s imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.

I found the same disclaimer in "Rise of the British Empire".
 
Ever hear Sam Kinison's piece about Jesus coming home to his wife after a long Easter weekend? Pure classic.
 
Hehehehe. Even more interesting will be how the various Christian churches deal with it.

Entertained in England,
Ellie
 
Hehehehe. Even more interesting will be how the various Christian churches deal with it.

Entertained in England,
Ellie

What is there to deal with?

One obscure reference on a small piece of old parchment by an unknown author is not conclusive of anything.
 
I think it's probably fake. On top of that...I don't really care. Lots of people have been married.
 
I hope no one finds the stuff I wrote on my gum wrapper. She even said that it is not evidence that he had a wife. It was dated around the same time as other writings that said he didn't. It is interesting though. I got a kick of her comment that they thought about it for a couple hours. LOL.
 
I don't see a problem for myself. The Bible is a selection of books chosen by a bunch of bishops at the council of Nicaea. I consider the message more important than the medium.
 
Back
Top