rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
I just read in the New York tabloids that a gay man, serving 50-to-life for a brutal murder on Long Island, is beginning a lawsuit against the state. He suffers gender dysphoria and charges that it is a case of cruel and unusual punishment to be forced to carry out his sentence as a man. He seeks full gender reassignment at taxpayer's expense and to serve the rest of his time in a woman's prison.
I was interested to learn that inmates who are hormone therapy at the time of their conviction are allowed to continue on the hormones at taxpayer expense-it is apparently seen as a medical neccesity, the denial of which would be cruel and unusual. This would seem to give some credibility to this case; although I don't think he was on the hormones at the time of his crime.
Apparently, many inmates on hormones are left in the general population of males; only those whose appearance is a judged a risk to their safety (and a cause of trouble amongst lustful inmates, I suppose) are placed in administrative segregation.
I think most people would say that the wannabe TS is just SOL morally and legally. Anyone disagree?
I was interested to learn that inmates who are hormone therapy at the time of their conviction are allowed to continue on the hormones at taxpayer expense-it is apparently seen as a medical neccesity, the denial of which would be cruel and unusual. This would seem to give some credibility to this case; although I don't think he was on the hormones at the time of his crime.
Apparently, many inmates on hormones are left in the general population of males; only those whose appearance is a judged a risk to their safety (and a cause of trouble amongst lustful inmates, I suppose) are placed in administrative segregation.
I think most people would say that the wannabe TS is just SOL morally and legally. Anyone disagree?