In this thread I ask Laurel and Manu a personal question that I would like answered.

Spinaroonie

LOOK WHAT I FOUND!
Joined
Jul 29, 2000
Posts
17,721
L-dawn and Mizzanu:

How much bandwith does Lit use a day?

R-Lo had a post on his vbull that says that SA is using 57mbit. The goons calculated that out to nearly 8 megs/sec and 650 Gigs a day. (Holy shit!)

Will you respond? If you do you will let the eagle soar out of pants and into Osama.
 
Re: In this thread I ask Laurel and Manu a personal question that I would like answered.

Spinaroonie said:
L-dawn and Mizzanu:

How much bandwith does Lit use a day?

R-Lo had a post on his vbull that says that SA is using 57mbit. The goons calculated that out to nearly 8 megs/sec and 650 Gigs a day. (Holy shit!)

Will you respond? If you do you will let the eagle soar out of pants and into Osama.

Do they use 8 Mb/s or 57 Mb/s? I didn't get the math in your post.

Lit uses less than 57 Mb/s, but more than 8. :)
 
Well, at least someone in the Bush era is making money. :p
 
Calculus can be used to study some properties of lossless multiplexing as it may be used in guaranteed service networks. Network calculus is a set of results that apply min-plus algebra to packet networks. There is a simple proof that shaping a traffic stream to conform with a burstiness constraint preserves the original constraints satisfied by the traffic stream. All rate based packet schedulers can be modeled with a simple rate latency service curve.
 
Dillinger said:
Calculus can be used to study some properties of lossless multiplexing as it may be used in guaranteed service networks. Network calculus is a set of results that apply min-plus algebra to packet networks. There is a simple proof that shaping a traffic stream to conform with a burstiness constraint preserves the original constraints satisfied by the traffic stream. All rate based packet schedulers can be modeled with a simple rate latency service curve.

What has that got to do with blowing smoke up my ass?

In plain language?
 
Re: Re: In this thread I ask Laurel and Manu a personal question that I would like an

Laurel said:
Do they use 8 Mb/s or 57 Mb/s? I didn't get the math in your post.

Lit uses less than 57 Mb/s, but more than 8. :)

8 megabytes per second.
57 megabits per second.

R-Lo had to 2x his bandwith alotment cos SA was taking up over his 50mbit cap for SA and SAnet sites.

He also got a deal w/ comedy central for some banners. SA won't die for a while it looks like.
 
riff said:
What has that got to do with blowing smoke up my ass?

In plain language?

Plain language?

Its all about the bandwidth specifically a general form of deterministic effective bandwidth and equivalent capacity. You see Spinaroonies' original question is meaningless when you that call acceptance regions based on deterministic criteria (loss or delay) are convex, in contrast to statistical cases where it the complement of the region which is convex. We thus find that, in general, the limit of the call acceptance region based on statistical multiplexing when the loss probability target tends to 0 may be strictly larger than the call acceptance region based on lossless multiplexing.
 
Last edited:
Dillinger said:
You see Spinaroonies' original question is meaningless when you that call acceptance regions based on deterministic criteria (loss or delay) are convex, in contrast to statistical cases where it the complement of the region which is convex.

Ask Laurel's pocketbook how meaningless it is :D
 
Someone's making money.

The hyperbola is somewhat congruent to the load-balance of the fingered BIOS. Though the polynomial circumference of the square root of pi might not superscede multimode anal sex.

:p
 
Dillinger said:
Plain language?

Its all about the bandwidth specifically a general form of deterministic effective bandwidth and equivalent capacity. You see Spinaroonies' original question is meaningless when you that call acceptance regions based on deterministic criteria (loss or delay) are convex, in contrast to statistical cases where it the complement of the region which is convex. We thus find that, in general, the limit of the call acceptance region based on statistical multiplexing when the loss probability target tends to 0 may be strictly larger than the call acceptance region based on lossless multiplexing.

I'm not quite a genius, but it seems to me that you're saying that Spin's question was "meaningless" because the technical format is wrong, considering lost packets and all.

It's a pretty simple question, to my knowledge. Hosting companies restrict bandwidth to a certain MB all the time. Whether those lost or delayed packets count is irrelevant. We're trying to get an estimate here.

I wish shy tall guy was here.
 
Back
Top