In 2012 it was BIG BIRD, in 2016 its BATHROOMS

This issue is actually about extreme femanism being couched as a gay/sexually confused/what ever the alphabet soup thing is.

Femanists goal is to create a society where there are no acknowledged differences between men and women. Separate public facilities such as restrooms, locker rooms, showers, etc, are an in your face every day, even ritualistic reminder of the differences.

There's no way legally to say how much clothes of the opposite sex one must be wearing to qualify as the other sex, so de facto anyone can now use any restroom, and in the schools, any locker room or shower, at any time and even go back and forth between them.

The transvestite, transsexual, etc, thing was a smokescreen for the real goal, getting rid of separate facilities for the sexes. Over time, as new generations grow up they will gradually start using both restrooms and locker rooms and then there will be no need or use for separate ones. Older generations, by habit will keep using the separate ones until they are gone, for the most part, the habits are so ingrained.

make no mistake, though, it NEVER had anything to do with 0.1% of the population of gender confused individuals. TOTAL smoke screen excuse.
 
I don't think there was a goal in bringing this up by any group. I think it just landed as a complex, sticky issue. Beyond that, it's have to take anyone seriously on speaking on feminism who can't even spell feminism correctly.
 
I long predicted that separate restrooms for the sexes would eventually come under the attack of the radical feminazis. I thought it would be in about 50 or 100 years though. I never thought it would happen in 2016, the gay agenda alphabet soup movement would be the vehicle, and that there would be as little public backlash or opposition as their has. I thought this would take decades of conditioning and still might provoke a massive reaction in 50 years when they tried to implement it.

I was right, but completely off the mark in when and how it would happen. I'm still stunned by this and the lack of public outrage and even outrage in support of it. I still wonder if the public doesn't realize that this isn't about the 0.1% of gender confused weirdos, but I really don't fathom what the hell they are thinking.
 
I don't think there was a goal in bringing this up by any group. I think it just landed as a complex, sticky issue. Beyond that, it's have to take anyone seriously on speaking on feminism who can't even spell feminism correctly.

I spell it that way intentionally to make a point.

As a little boy in the 1970s, with radical femanism raging across society, I thought to myself, why do they call themselves feminists when they are hostile to femininity.
 
I spell it that way intentionally to make a point.

As a little boy in the 1970s, with radical femanism raging across society, I thought to myself, why do they call themselves feminists when they are hostile to femininity.

So, you didn't take them seriously and decided to make fun of them from the get go. Yeah, that works wonders in discussion rather than diatribe. :rolleyes:

It wasn't liberals who poked the lion on this one. People have been using bathrooms on the basis of their personal identity for decades and sweet young things haven't been raped left and right by men in dresses in bathrooms. A man doesn't have to put on a dress to rape a woman in the bathroom it that's his intent (and if he wanted to wear a dress to do it, nothing has kept him from doing that since indoor plumbing was invented), and transexuals don't go into to public bathrooms to rape young women (most of them have no interest in young women)--they go there to relieve themselves. The last several invasions of bathrooms by those with contrasting sex bits that I've seen were women taking over the men's bathrooms in public places because theirs had long lines and the men's room didn't. And they've always been politely accommodated as far as I can see. So, no, it's not the liberals or the feminists who poked this lion. And it's certainly not liberals or feminists who are dreaming up and screaming about truly bizarre lalalaland scenarios on this.
 
Last edited:
This is less about the 0.1% of people on the sexual margins and more about the 0.001% of South Carolinians who are politicians.
 
Back
Top