Implied underage sex in stories?

[Colleen Thomas]

Bravo on both points.


I'd like to add that in Colly's case, she's speaking about a specific incident (which I think would be just as powerful without a specific age) that took place when the character was legally a 'child.' Now, everybody thinks that this is not allowed, but they are quite wrong.

In my case I mention a specific age here as a way of showing the character is now over the legal age of conscent without actually saying "hey, look, I'm 18" The preceeding Paragraphs show that she has been away from home more than three years and must therefore be more than 18.

The story has been pending for quite a while and I am begining to think it may be my first rejection. If so and the age is the cause I can rework that to a more obvious statement that she is now 18.

-Colly

 

[HawaiiBill]

Coprophagia

Sheesh, Sven. You are on my ignore list but I came by the necessity for this correction because a net buddy forwarded your attempt at spelling. He said it is an example of why Literotica needs editors.

 

[Quasimodem]

A word about Coprophagia from vetinfo.com


Cat litter - problems as dog snack


Question: Dear Dr. Mike,

I have a question that might seem a little strange. I recently decided to
switch from a popular brand of cat litter to "Feline Pine", not only because
I think it sounds like a healthier, more eco-wise alternative, but because
my dog eats a lot of cat poop! I started thinking I didn't like the idea of
her ingesting a heavily treated clay litter, no matter the amount. Now, after
just purchasing my first bag of the wood pulp alternative, I'm concerned
that maybe wood pulp isn't so good for her (the dog) either. (The bag talks
about how the pellets swell when they absorb urine). Could small daily doses of
the wood pulp litter hurt my dog? I live in an apartment and don't really
have the option of keeping the dog away from the litter.
Thanks
T.



So you've got a corndog who likes to eat crap from a pussy. That's hardly anything worth siccing a vet on her tail.


Let's see what the Vet at vetinfo.com has to say:


Answer: Tricia-

I can't tell you which is better for the digestive system, for sure, but I
suspect it is the wood pulp. It is basically indigestible fibre and wood
pulp was used in some of the "high fibre" breads made for humans several
years ago. A lot of my patients chew up sticks and other wood objects, too.
Based on all of this, I think that the wood pulp won't cause problems.

Mike Richards, DVM
12/8/99



He did not however say there was anything wrong with the alternative of those indigestible fibres, eating crap from a pussy.


Still, this is hardly a definitive answer.



At the bottom of the page there is a notice in small type:


Michal is not a Veterinarian.


Anybody who expects to get an Education fron the Internet is going to get an education!

 

[reohoko]

There are dedicated people out there who hate Literotica with a vehemence that is difficult to believe. They quote sacred texts to describe us as various types of sinners and degenerates.
Cautious Og

I just wanta say... bah humbug, sinners and degenerates are highly overrated... go for the gold--

I am an oversexed provert who wishes that sex were one of the 5 food groups.

wish I had time to read all these posts.... I LOVE IT!!!

Don't let Literotica get hurt... it's my second favorite playground!!!

 

[reohoko]

Society's hangups? I think you are confusing wider society with a minority of militant feminists and misguided moralising religious leaders and corporations too scared to ever intimate that people have sexual thughts under the age of 18
=========================

I wish it was a minority. Unfortunately minority or majority they seem to hold sufficient sway that the US social norm is one of the most sexually repressed nations on the planet save for the muslim nations. Japanese TV has sexually explicit programs as well as most of Europe. Things that are only on late night HBO here are evening prime time in other countries.

The militant feminazis are interesting point. Often gay they promote oral sex between females but frown on male oral sex with females bashing males. Everyone has an agenda

I lied, I am going to read most of this ... this is good reading.

Did you also know that the majority of Japanese TV and such has underage sex? Very well kept from the American public... and all translations to English are made to tell us that it is all OVER age. henti being a prime example.

 

[HawaiiBill]

A word about Coprophagia from vetinfo.com

Based on all of this, I think that the wood pulp won't cause problems.
Mike Richards, DVM
12/8/99

He did not however say there was anything wrong with the alternative of those indigestible fibres, eating crap from a pussy.
Still, this is hardly a definitive answer.
At the bottom of the page there is a notice in small type:

Michal is not a Veterinarian.

Anybody who expects to get an Education fron the Internet is going to get an education!

Quasi,

Maybe you merely need to read the internet more carefully. The line, "Michal is not a Veterinarian" doesn't refer to the Mike Richards, DVM, who IS a veterinarian. The 'Michal' is Michal Justin, who seems to be the webmaster.

 

[reohoko]

James Kilpatrick's column last week touched on this ... Ashcroft

Tongue in cheek, Stevens offered an ideal solution: "Those who abhor and those who tolerate sexually explicit speech can seek out like-minded people and settle in communities that share their views on what is acceptable for themselves and their children." Trouble is, he added, such a sorting mechanism "does not exist in cyberspace."

Completely misguided....
in the real world we are forced to live in communities that fulfil the necessities which life requires us to fill (availability of jobs, schools, transporation, and affordability).

In cyberspace we are open to "sorting mechanisms" that do allow us to live within "communities that share their views on what is acceptable for themselves and their children". Maybe, this Stevens is confused?

When they get that right, they will figure out the real solution to children seeing (or not seeing as the case may be) stuff online is parent's taking responsibilty. NOT taking away people's rights. The government is not responsible for raising children, we are. However, that could start a whole new arguement... so I'll just leave it at that.

 

[reohoko]

One thing that bothers me, is that on the radio last year I heard about how the age of consent in Ohio happens to be 14.

-Medi-

I live in Ohio, and that is incorrect. Legal age of consent is 18 here too... HOWEVER, last I heard, as long as both teens were over 14 (or maybe it's 16) and under 18 there was no actually law broken. Since it's illegal to kill your kids for having sex, the police just take you home to get a lecture if you get caught in a car here.

(No, I didn't grow up here.. I am New Englander and I think all of Ohio is weird.)

 

[MathGirl]

Cat litter - problems as dog snack

Dear Quaz,
Thank God you posted that information. It's something I've often wondered about but didn't have the courage to ask. You are a wonderful person.
MG

 

[Quasimodem]

Dear Quaz,
Thank God you posted that information. It's something I've often wondered about but didn't have the courage to ask. You are a wonderful person.
MG

Pussy Doo is right up there on the canine hit parade, after (Beggin') Bacon Strips.

That'll keep Walter from chewing up your shoes!

 

[Colleen Thomas]

My story was posted without having to change the passage I posted in this thread earlier. That would seem to indicate that the rule of thumb so eloquently put forward by Wierd Harold is correct.

-Colly

 

[MathGirl]

Originally posted by Colleen Thomas the rule of thumb so eloquently put forward by Wierd Harold is correct.

Dear Co,
In contrast to most of us around here, Mr Harold is ALWAYS correct.
MG

 

[Rumple Foreskin]

Dear Co,
In contrast to most of us around here, Mr Harold is ALWAYS correct.
MG

I'm told he once thought he might have made a mistake. Does that count as being wrong?

Rumple

 

[Svenskaflicka]

I may have my faults, but being wrong isn't one of them.

 

[RawHumor]

What have you people done to my thread? LOL

That's a LOVELY av you've got there, MathGirl.

 

[Svenskaflicka]

Serves you right for having such a horrifying AV!

Svenskaflicka
Appalled

 

[MathGirl]

What have you people done to my thread? LOL

That's a LOVELY av you've got there, MathGirl.

Dear Raw,
"Your" thread has met the fate of all who outlive their original purpose. It's thrown to the dogs.

When the original topic of a thread has been stomped, dissected, turned inside out, spanked, and its bottom powdered, it's anarchy. Seems that people here do some of their best thinking under those conditions.
MG
Sic transit gloria ovinis

 

[Quasimodem]

Sic transit gloria ovinis

Your pet sheep, Gloria, threw up on the BART, again

 

[Barnaby]

Implications

Just weighing in here with my own recent experience. In my series THE INTERVIEW PROJECT (pts. 1-5), the girls were mostly 19-20 years old. I had to re-edit in almost every case to get an approval, even though any mention of underage experiences were true, consensual and, dare I say it, more or less journalistic. With number four, I eliminated any explicit underage references beforehand and still got rejected. Seems that we establish her age is 20 and then she mentions she had done something 4 years earlier. I guess LIT figured (quite accurately, I'm sorry to say) that the Patriot act watchdogs would be doing the math. No IMPLIED underage sex. I understand but the political climate is turning me away from doing any more "reality" pieces. Fantasy is safer...so far. THE INTERVIEW PROJECT PART 4- NATALIE

 

[Pure]

Hi Barnaby,

Interesting info.


you said in part,

//Seems that we establish her age is 20 and then she mentions she had done something 4 years earlier. I guess LIT figured (quite accurately, I'm sorry to say) that the Patriot act watchdogs would be doing the math.//

Yes I could see that's just too obvious. She should have been edited to say, 'a couple years ago.'

But I take it you agree that the main objection, at Literotica, is to detailing the underage things, not simply mentioning an act??

Can you describe in more detail 1) the objectionable passages; 2) the objection made; 3) the remedy?

Btw, as you state, 'truth' or 'consent' or even 'legal' (as regards the act) is not relevant to the rule, which simply says no underage sex. Indeed, were they married 17 year olds, blessed by the Pope, the story or true account would not be postable at Lit.

Good luck with your interviews and writing them up. As I posted to another thread, I did find parts interesting though often 'drawn out.'

Best,
J.

PS, I don't think it's the Patriot Act, it's COPA or 'online protection' that has the teeth, if judges ever lift its suspension.

 

[Seattle Zack]

Maybe, this Stevens is confused?

When they get that right, they will figure out the real solution to children seeing (or not seeing as the case may be) stuff online is parent's taking responsibilty.

Um ... yeah. Well, "this Stevens" is a Supreme Court Justice, so his opinion does carry a little weight, regardless of whether you think he's right or wrong. Anyway, if you read the whole Kilpatrick column, I think you'll find the last line says the same thing you did.


Enough of that, here's a sheep story:

A few years ago, the Sierra Club and the USFS were presenting an alternative to Wyoming sheep ranchers for controlling the coyote population. It seemed that, after years of the ranchers using the tried and true methods of shooting and/or trapping the predators, the environmentalists had a "more humane" solution.

What they proposed was for the animals to be captured alive, the males castrated, then let loose again -- and the population would be controlled.

I kid you not, this was ACTUALLY proposed to the Wyoming Wool and Sheep Grower's association by the Sierra Club and the USFS.

Well, all the ranchers thought about this amazing idea for a couple of minutes. Finally, an old boy in the back stood up, kicked his hat back and said, "Son, I don't think you understand our problem. These coyotes ain't screwin' our sheep, they're eatin' 'em!!"

 

[Quasimodem]

I'm only adding fuel to MathGirl's charge of obsession . . . but. . . .

A researcher was conducting a survey into sheep shagging.

First of all he visits a Cornish farmer.

"So, how do Cornish farmers shag their sheep?"

"Well, I take the hind legs of the sheep and put them down my wellie boots and take the front legs of the sheep and put them over a wall."

"That's very interesting," replies the researcher and he writes down the answer and he leaves.

Then he interviews a Midlands Farmer.

"So, how do Midlands farmers shag their Sheep?"

"Well, I take the hind legs of the sheep and put them down my wellie boots and take the front legs of the sheep and put them over a wall."

"Very interesting," replies the researcher. "The Cornish do it that way, too."

He jots down the answer and leaves.

Then he questions a farmer from Abergaveny. "So, how do Abergaveny farmers shag their Sheep?"

"Well, I take the hind legs of the sheep and put them down my wellie boots and take the front legs of the sheep and put them over my shoulders."

"Over your shoulders?" inquires the researcher. "Don't you put them over a wall like everyone else?"

"What?" exclaims the farmer. "And miss out on all the kissing?"

 

[RawHumor]

Serves you right for having such a horrifying AV!

Svenskaflicka
Appalled

Moi? So, are you against police, against South Park, or against cartoon characters in general?

 

[RawHumor]

Dear Raw,
"Your" thread has met the fate of all who outlive their original purpose. It's thrown to the dogs.

Thanks, but it was mostly a rhetorical question meant in jest.