Impeachment primer

[OldJourno]

Democrats maintained two decades ago that lying under oath during a legal proceeding and suborning perjury was not an impeachable offense. There was no dispute about Mr. Clinton’s actions.
Today, however, Democrats argue that Mr. Trump deserves to be ousted from the Oval Office for an ambiguous phone call to a foreign leader, citing the nexus between a corruption investigation that never occurred and U.S. aid that was never withheld.
From the LV Review-Journal

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Maybe you should wait for the Articles of Impeachment before walking around with your cock in your hand.

 

[cowslinger64]

You mean the "ambiguous phone call" where Trump said he'd withhold the money if the Ukraine didn't dig up dirt on Biden?

What fuckin planet do you people live on?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Democrats maintained two decades ago that lying under oath during a legal proceeding and suborning perjury was not an impeachable offense. There was no dispute about Mr. Clinton’s actions.
Today, however, Democrats argue that Mr. Trump deserves to be ousted from the Oval Office for an ambiguous phone call to a foreign leader, citing the nexus between a corruption investigation that never occurred and U.S. aid that was never withheld.
From the LV Review-Journal

Wait...that's it? That's all you have to blurt?

That's THE primer?

https://media0.giphy.com/media/XaLTN51wv0Kre/giphy.gif

Didn't even bother linking to the source. What's "LV" stand for, Louis Vuitton?

A slow afternoon at the homestead, eh, Journey?

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[Rightguide]

Democrats maintained two decades ago that lying under oath during a legal proceeding and suborning perjury was not an impeachable offense. There was no dispute about Mr. Clinton’s actions.
Today, however, Democrats argue that Mr. Trump deserves to be ousted from the Oval Office for an ambiguous phone call to a foreign leader, citing the nexus between a corruption investigation that never occurred and U.S. aid that was never withheld.
From the LV Review-Journal

The impeachment inquiry isn't real, it's a made up script to facilitate a coup. Note how the interviews are held in secret, so the American people can't here the testimony and weigh it against the charge. They only get leaks from those who back impeachment that support their script, that Trump has done something wrong, but never the actual evidence. That's what happened with the Mueller investigation. Trump has not committed an impeachable offense. All we hear is media and witness opinions and a bunch of phony polls.

 

[OldJourno]

You mean the "ambiguous phone call" where Trump said he'd withhold the money if the Ukraine didn't dig up dirt on Biden?

What fuckin planet do you people live on?

And somehow Ukraine got the money without an investigation.
Thin gruel there buddy.

BTW, the dirt is there for all to see. Surely you have seen the video with Biden bragging that U.S. aid wouldn't flow until certain conditions were met. That sounds like a much more serious quid pro quo, especially since Biden's son landed a $50,000 a month job, one in which he had no prior experience.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

The Depositions were held in closed setting (just like the Benghazi ones) to prevent witnesses from coordinating their stories, which is exactly how it's done everywhere. Nothing "secret" about it.

Now that the house has voted, the Depos will be made available, and public hearings will start and you can see all those witnesses testify.

There haven't been any charges yet. When the Articles are filed, you will have all the witness testimony you need.

So shut your piehole

The impeachment inquiry isn't real, it's a made up script to facilitate a coup. Note how the interviews are held in secret, so the American people can't here the testimony and weigh it against the charge. They only get leaks from those who back impeachment that support their script, that Trump has done something wrong, but never the actual evidence. That's what happened with the Mueller investigation. Trump has not committed an impeachable offense. All we hear is media and witness opinions and a bunch of phony polls.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

THe phone call was not ambiguous, but even so, it's not the only evidence. The extortion plot was already well known and underway, and you will hear witness after witness testify to it.

ANd, not correct to say the AID was not withheld. Yes, it was--for "agency issues" acc. to the WH lies at the time. When they got caught in the extortion plot, they had to release it. But too late, they were caught.

Democrats maintained two decades ago that lying under oath during a legal proceeding and suborning perjury was not an impeachable offense. There was no dispute about Mr. Clinton’s actions.
Today, however, Democrats argue that Mr. Trump deserves to be ousted from the Oval Office for an ambiguous phone call to a foreign leader, citing the nexus between a corruption investigation that never occurred and U.S. aid that was never withheld.
From the LV Review-Journal

 

[OldJourno]

THe phone call was not ambiguous, but even so, it's not the only evidence. The extortion plot was already well known and underway, and you will hear witness after witness testify to it.

ANd, not correct to say the AID was not withheld. Yes, it was--for "agency issues" acc. to the WH lies at the time. When they got caught in the extortion plot, they had to release it. But too late, they were caught.

No, this is all bullshit, just another in the continuing effort to get rid of Trump.
Mueller worked his magic for two years and came up with jack shit. No collusion, no obstruction. You can claim otherwise. You probably will.
Plus, and I mean plus, there were media and Democrat created outrages every other week, the here today, gone tomorrow kind that never took hold but were sure to sink the president.
Now we've got this bullshit phone call investigation that was started by some Democrat-insider-friend-of-Schiff who was the initial whistleblower. Wow, how's that for reliable?
You can bank on it if you want to, but it's just more of the same old same old as far as I can see.
Next up: Schiff will cry "obstruction" because he doesn't have shit.

 

[Rightguide]

The Depositions were held in closed setting (just like the Benghazi ones) to prevent witnesses from coordinating their stories, which is exactly how it's done everywhere. Nothing "secret" about it.

Now that the house has voted, the Depos will be made available, and public hearings will start and you can see all those witnesses testify.

There haven't been any charges yet. When the Articles are filed, you will have all the witness testimony you need.

So shut your piehole

Benghazi wasn't an impeachment hearing, stupid. It involved highly classified information, that's why it was partially held in a SCIF. This is an illegal impeachment inquiry unlike any other in American history, dummy. It's been going on for over a month but wasn't authorized until last Thursday. Schiff will write a highly partisan report full of partisan charges unsupported by the actual "testimony" that will only be "appended" to the report in hopes it is never read by the public. All of while knowing it will meet certain defeat in the Senate and in the public square. So please, STFU with our dreamy ass bullshit.

 

[RoryN]

Impeachment Deplorable false-narrative primer

Fixed your title.

 

[adrina]

Impeachment Deplorable false-narrative primer

Fixed your title.

Pretty much. A "primer" on the impeachment proceedings coming from a Trump apologist is as useful as a rubber crutch in a polio ward.

He should have just posted "NO COLLUSION!!"

 

[OldJourno]

Impeachment Deplorable false-narrative primer

Fixed your title.

Triggered.

 

[SpeareChucker]

*chuckle*



They really got him now, again...

 

[Adre]

Extortion. It’s simple. And it has always been a criminal offense.

 

[bellisarius]

I can't decide whether they're behaving more like Elmer Fudd or Wiley Coyote.

 

[bellisarius]

Extortion. It’s simple. And it has always been a criminal offense.

Really? Tell us about this "extortion."

 

[SpeareChucker]

They're still trying to stick pasta to the wall...



Just making a mess of their own kitchen.

 

[Adre]

Really? Tell us about this "extortion."

You can read all about it in an article of impeachment.

 

[bellisarius]

You can read all about it in an article of impeachment.

Well then, they're wasting a lot of time and money when the obvious is right in front of their faces. If the sanctions on Iran aren't an act of extortion I don't know what is.

 

[jaF0]

I've said before that it's a mistake to focus on one phone call when I expect we'll see multiple instances of bribery, extortion, embezzlement and a host of other crimes committed by the Orangutan and his cohorts. When it's all said and done, I expect at least some (more) of them to be in prison. This phone call is the least of his worries.

 

[Adre]

Well then, they're wasting a lot of time and money when the obvious is right in front of their faces. If the sanctions on Iran aren't an act of extortion I don't know what is.

Tell us how your President is personally receiving something of value to him—which is what he demanded from Ukraine—in exchange for those sanctions. As I said it will be explained for you in the Article of Impeachment.

 

[bellisarius]

Tell us how your President is personally receiving something of value to him—which is what he demanded from Ukraine—in exchange for those sanctions. As I said it will be explained for you in the Article of Impeachment.

What thing of value did he receive?

 

[coati]

The impeachment inquiry isn't real, it's a made up script to facilitate a coup... Trump has not committed an impeachable offense...

Impeachment primer for Deplorables:

Denying reality?

Wait, and then learn how real it is.

Conviction is another story, but impeachment for this President is real. At least some in D.C. will hold this paranoid conspiracy nut accountable

 

[jaF0]

What thing of value did he receive?

Are you really THAT stupid?





(No need to answer. We already know.)