Impeach Trump?

[Ishmael]

Honestly you 'progressives', just how do you think that's going to work? On what grounds are you envisioning this taking place?

Yeah, I know that every time Maxine, Corrine, or ole Joe try to bring articles of impeachment to the house floor the press is going to make it the lead story and you folks are going to start a thread. To what end?

So, lay out the scenario. Give us a glimpse into the future as you envision it.

Ishmael

 

[someoneyouknow]

The Brits and Irish are already taking bets Trump will be impeached or resign before his term is out. One place even has a line it will happen in the next six months:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/before-trump-was-sworn-in-people-were-betting-on-impeachment/

This would go well with the investigations over intercepted communications between Trump associates and Russia:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-law-enforcement-looking-into-russian-communications/

 

[Ishmael]

The Brits and Irish are already taking bets Trump will be impeached or resign before his term is out. One place even has a line it will happen in the next six months:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/before-trump-was-sworn-in-people-were-betting-on-impeachment/

This would go well with the investigations over intercepted communications between Trump associates and Russia:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-law-enforcement-looking-into-russian-communications/

Yeah, yeah. I saw your post in another thread. Considering that they'll bet on anything, and the bookies will start a line on anything, your post is, well, of no interest or consequence.

Sooooooo, try to answer the question. Under what circumstances do YOU see the house bringing articles of impeachment?

Ishmael

 

[Disgustipated]

Honestly you 'progressives', just how do you think that's going to work? On what grounds are you envisioning this taking place?

Yeah, I know that every time Maxine, Corrine, or ole Joe try to bring articles of impeachment to the house floor the press is going to make it the lead story and you folks are going to start a thread. To what end?

So, lay out the scenario. Give us a glimpse into the future as you envision it.

Ishmael

You're asking the Lit board. Has anyone here actually said anything about impeachment?

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Impeachment requires lotsa effort and cooperation, but for Trump to fill Elizabeth Warrens ass with the IRS only takes a phone call. Or he can delay money she desperately needs for her constituents.

 

[someoneyouknow]

Yeah, yeah. I saw your post in another thread. Considering that they'll bet on anything, and the bookies will start a line on anything, your post is, well, of no interest or consequence.

Sooooooo, try to answer the question. Under what circumstances do YOU see the house bringing articles of impeachment?

Ishmael

As soon as we see what the investigations into his associate's dealings with the Russians reveal:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-law-enforcement-looking-into-russian-communications/

Just like Watergate, a little bit comes out at a time until it becomes a torrent.

 

[BotanyBoy]

As soon as we see what the investigations into his associate's dealings with the Russians reveal:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-law-enforcement-looking-into-russian-communications/

Just like Watergate, a little bit comes out at a time until it becomes a torrent.

What he talked to Russians? OH NOES!!!

Fucky doo....they aren't going to impeach him for that shit.

 

[Ishmael]

As soon as we see what the investigations into his associate's dealings with the Russians reveal:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-law-enforcement-looking-into-russian-communications/

Just like Watergate, a little bit comes out at a time until it becomes a torrent.

Well, a friend of a friend of mine said that...............

Right up there with Bush the Oneth's SR71 flight to Paris to torpedo Carter.

I never did business at the level of Trump but even I have 'associates' with ties to Russia. In a world as interconnected as the one we live in such connections are inevitable.

This whole "Russia Connection" mantra is a false flag. I see nothing in Trumps stated goals that would be of benefit to Russia. And I'm certain that everyone is going to be watching for signs of such. And I can reliably predict that the first such sign is going to be policies related to Syria. A fight that we should have never started to begin with.

Ishmael

 

[OldJourno]

As soon as we see what the investigations into his associate's dealings with the Russians reveal:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-law-enforcement-looking-into-russian-communications/

Just like Watergate, a little bit comes out at a time until it becomes a torrent.

Stunning how the taste for investigative journalism, even thin gruel like this, seems to blossom when a Republican is in the White House.

 

[Ishmael]

Stunning how the taste for investigative journalism, even thin gruel like this, seems to blossom when a Republican is in the White House.

A total denial of reality. As a candidate Hillary sucked. Some democrats are finally embracing that fact, not publicly, but within the inner circles.

In 2008 she lost the nomination to a junior senator from Illinois. A nomination that was considered to be a lock, even within her own party. Last year she damn near lost the nomination to a mid 70's Socialist, and might well have had it not been for the non-democratic nature of the democrats primary system. While she did well in NY it was obvious that she was not the national candidate that the democrat insiders hoped she would be.

But back to the question, what will Trump be impeached for?

Ishmael

 

[erostwo]

Share the Wealth

Is pretty much the picture I got from the Reagan Years, and the problem was that's my money out, but their money in so, to speak! Spending a balanced budget or signing some tax initiative, stocks and bonds ... liberation of the homemaker! Silver Certificates?

 

[Comshaw]

A total denial of reality. As a candidate Hillary sucked. Some democrats are finally embracing that fact, not publicly, but within the inner circles.

In 2008 she lost the nomination to a junior senator from Illinois. A nomination that was considered to be a lock, even within her own party. Last year she damn near lost the nomination to a mid 70's Socialist, and might well have had it not been for the non-democratic nature of the democrats primary system. While she did well in NY it was obvious that she was not the national candidate that the democrat insiders hoped she would be.

But back to the question, what will Trump be impeached for?

Ishmael

He hasn't done anything as of yet to be impeached for has he? So How is anyone going to tell you how, when it hasn't happened yet? As always you're trying to lay down a smoke screen to obscure what you and everyone else knows is coming. Do you really believe that the Donald will be able to make it four years without stepping on his dick? I don't think so. I think it will come sooner then later. He's going to try to use his tried a true formula for business (fuck everyone as soon and as much as possible) to run the government and he will be caught at it. Tick...tick...tick.


Comshaw

 

[Comshaw]

What he talked to Russians? OH NOES!!!

Fucky doo....they aren't going to impeach him for that shit.

You really need to go get your meds checked.

http://i.imgur.com/ym43YWe.gif

Comshaw

 

[Ishmael]

He hasn't done anything as of yet to be impeached for has he? So How is anyone going to tell you how, when it hasn't happened yet? As always you're trying to lay down a smoke screen to obscure what you and everyone else knows is coming. Do you really believe that the Donald will be able to make it four years without stepping on his dick? I don't think so. I think it will come sooner then later. He's going to try to use his tried a true formula for business (fuck everyone as soon and as much as possible) to run the government and he will be caught at it. Tick...tick...tick.


Comshaw

Impeach Trump

It started before he was ever sworn in.

As far as you "thinking", I've seen little evidence of that over the years. If you used the term 'guess' I'd probably be a little less harsh. Every one is entitled to guess, but never confuse that with 'thinking'. Thinking involves reasoning and that entails a logical chain of events/thought, none of which you've displayed..............or is this some secret known only to yourself and an inner circle? Your scenario is that "he's goin' to do somethin'." Brilliant!

As far as the utilization of raw power, what in the hell do you think politics is all about? It's the ultimate blood sport sparky. Under your criteria damn near every president that ever held office would have been impeached.

Ishmael

 

[Conager]

He hasn't done anything as of yet to be impeached for has he? So How is anyone going to tell you how, when it hasn't happened yet? As always you're trying to lay down a smoke screen to obscure what you and everyone else knows is coming. Do you really believe that the Donald will be able to make it four years without stepping on his dick? I don't think so. I think it will come sooner then later. He's going to try to use his tried a true formula for business (fuck everyone as soon and as much as possible) to run the government and he will be caught at it. Tick...tick...tick.


Comshaw

How do these straw-businesses of which you speak, manage to stay in business whilst "fucking everyone as soon and as much as possible?"

Are consumers of their goods and services unaware of the evil fucking they are receiving, or are they willing participants in the fucking you allege they are getting?

How are they able to retain any employees? Suppliers? Transportation?

Couldn't this all be stopped with a government agency issuing some don't "fuck everyone as soon or as much as possible" regulations?

What about simple nationalization of key businesses? Wouldn't that stop it?

I don't mean all businesses, I am no pinko commie, Just the ones prone to fucking people out of things they have a right to like: healthcare, communication, transportation, housing, energy, and food.

 

[Conager]

Impeach Trump

It started before he was ever sworn in.

As far as you "thinking", I've seen little evidence of that over the years. If you used the term 'guess' I'd probably be a little less harsh. Every one is entitled to guess, but never confuse that with 'thinking'. Thinking involves reasoning and that entails a logical chain of events/thought, none of which you've displayed..............or is this some secret known only to yourself and an inner circle? Your scenario is that "he's goin' to do somethin'." Brilliant!

As far as the utilization of raw power, what in the hell do you think politics is all about? It's the ultimate blood sport sparky. Under your criteria damn near every president that ever held office would have been impeached.

Ishmael

The degree of fail in his thinking is pretty significant.

This "something" that Trump would have to do would have to be something that the people that put Republicans nationwide, and Trump specifically, into positions of power dissaprove of, not something the left would object to. Pissing off the left would improve his standing with those that elected him, not degrade it.

That makes this "thing" something that the left would actually like a classical New York Lliberal like Trump to advance.

So he's going to piss off all the Republicans over something the liberals appreciate, and they are going to throw in with the Republicans and vote to remove him?

 

[BotanyBoy]

You really need to go get your meds checked.

http://i.imgur.com/ym43YWe.gif

Comshaw

Why is talking to Russians a crime now or some shit?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

As soon as we see what the investigations into his associate's dealings with the Russians reveal:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-law-enforcement-looking-into-russian-communications/

Just like Watergate, a little bit comes out at a time until it becomes a torrent.

Ahem...

We think that the more important compare and contrast is not so much Watergate as the Benghazi coverup which led to the emails which led to the foundation which led to Trump.

 

[Liar]

Are you asking the leftists of the GB to explain what Maxine Waters is thinking?

That's silly. I don't remember anyone here ever trying to hold you responsible for Louie Gohmert.

 

[someoneyouknow]

Ahem...

We think that the more important compare and contrast is not so much Watergate as the Benghazi coverup which led to the emails which led to the foundation which led to Trump.

What coverup? Every Republican-led investigation (all seven of them) found the exact same thing: there was no warning of the impending attack, there was no call of any rescue attempt and no evidence of any wrongdoing:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/benghazi-report-from-republican-led-house-panel-debunks-allegations/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0

 

[Saint Peter]

What coverup? Every Republican-led investigation (all seven of them) found the exact same thing: there was no warning of the impending attack, there was no call of any rescue attempt and no evidence of any wrongdoing:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/benghazi-report-from-republican-led-house-panel-debunks-allegations/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0

You are talking to a dog. Gump does not need anymore proof than the American Thinker telling him how to bark.

 

[Greypowerful]

He hasn't done anything as of yet to be impeached for has he? So How is anyone going to tell you how, when it hasn't happened yet? As always you're trying to lay down a smoke screen to obscure what you and everyone else knows is coming. Do you really believe that the Donald will be able to make it four years without stepping on his dick? I don't think so. I think it will come sooner then later. He's going to try to use his tried a true formula for business (fuck everyone as soon and as much as possible) to run the government and he will be caught at it. Tick...tick...tick.


Comshaw

Sorry, Ish, but as he often does, Comshaw nails it. When your sane self chooses to.... nevermind.

Suffice it to say, it's too early to even consider Impeachment, unless of course one's a Fifth Columnist for the dumbarsed DNC.

Peace. Out! Time to go play with airplanes.

 

[Saint Peter]

Fly carefully!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

:nods:


The email to Chelsea stating that it was a terrorist act somewhat undermines the narrative established by the Liberal media complex. Of course they wouldn't call the movie narrative a lie, that's just the difference between public and private policy...

 

[Ishmael]

Sorry, Ish, but as he often does, Comshaw nails it. When your sane self chooses to.... nevermind.

Suffice it to say, it's too early to even consider Impeachment, unless of course one's a Fifth Columnist for the dumbarsed DNC.

Peace. Out! Time to go play with airplanes.

No he doesn't jimi. He first says Trump hasn't done anything, then immediately follows it up with "but he's gon'to."

Trump has a stated agenda with quite a few items on that list. Surely these soothsayers have one or more of those agenda items in mind that will set Trump up for articles of impeachment. I've merely asked them to game it out.

But it seems when confronted they fall back on, "He's gon'to."

Ishmael