Image hosting for Lit?

Liar

now with 17% more class
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Posts
43,715
I've always used Imageshack for hosting of pics that I post on boards and stuff. Fast, easy and reliable.

But now thay have banned hotlinking from the Literorica domain for some reason (because Sex is Bad, or something, I dunno...), and all I get when trying to use it is a standard "This domain is blocked" picture instead.

Does anyone have a suggestion for a similar hosting site that...well...works?
 
I use photbicket as well. You can't host porn, but they don't care where you link what you have hosted too (I just know that could be said better, but can't figure out how just now).
 
Basically, what I'm after is something fast and free, that doesn't demand registration (or if it does, won't spam me) and not likely to apply a "prude" clause anytime soon.

I'll give Photobucket a swirl. Thanks, folks. :)
 
If you get a lot of activity from a hotlink at Photobucket, they will investigate your photo album and where you link your images so make sure they're tame. Still they may block images to Literotica since they have done that to my website banners on ASSTR that were tame.

I use My Filehut too and don't get hassled for content.
 
Liar said:
Basically, what I'm after is something fast and free, that doesn't demand registration (or if it does, won't spam me) and not likely to apply a "prude" clause anytime soon.

I'll give Photobucket a swirl. Thanks, folks. :)

I don't think you'll find a free image host that won't aply a "prude clause." Photocucket just doesn't apply their prude clause withthe kind of sledge-hammer approach Imagesshack used.

I've seen several complaints about Photbucket deleting images that violate their "no adult content" clause -- i.e. they don't block sites, they just remove images from their servers and occassionally cancel accounts for users who don't take the hint and continue to violate the TOS.
 
Weird Harold said:
I don't think you'll find a free image host that won't aply a "prude clause." Photocucket just doesn't apply their prude clause withthe kind of sledge-hammer approach Imagesshack used.

I've seen several complaints about Photbucket deleting images that violate their "no adult content" clause -- i.e. they don't block sites, they just remove images from their servers and occassionally cancel accounts for users who don't take the hint and continue to violate the TOS.

Oh dear, thanks for the warning. I was uploading images then deleting them from my computer. Good way to lose them, I guess.
 
Back
Top