U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you're kind's on the list, I don't give two shits.![]()
He has no power to write an EO that confers rights or benefits.
He has no power to write an EO that confers rights or benefits.
The part where "executive" and "execute" as in "will faithfully execute the law" have the same root.
I knew of an old gold miner who used to pretend like his donkey was giving him advice on what to do and where to go, on hearing these stories I thought he would have been a good Democrat Party man. I think of him and see Adre's AV.
![]()
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/connca...vists-will-never-stop-heckling-obama-n1924347The problem is particularly acute for Obama because he has twice now said he would not unilaterally halt deportations only to later cave.
First, he said he did not have the power to enact the DREAM Act by executive fiat. Then, after pressure from activists and hecklers, he relented and announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in 2012.
Then, he said he that was the limit of his power. When asked by the National Council of La Raza if he would halt deportations further, Obama said, "That’s not how our democracy functions. That's not how our Constitution is written."
But after pressure from activists and hecklers, he relented and announced the Immigration Accountability Executive Action last week.
The problem with both DACA and the latest amnesty is that they have no limiting principle. If Obama has the power to give work permits to illegal immigrants who were brought to this country as children, then he also has the power to give work permits to the parents who brought them here. There simply is no legal principle limiting Obama's power to one group.
And that is why amnesty activists will continue to heckle Obama and will begin to heckle Hillary Clinton when she begins making public appearances too.