FloridaSmoothie
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2003
- Posts
- 1,201
If Romney gets the nomination, but loses the general, what will that do to the Republican party?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Romney gets the nomination, but loses the general, what will that do to the Republican party?
I got to buy a clue with this one.Theres been 3 winners, the difference would be what?
If Romney gets the nomination, but loses the general, what will that do to the Republican party?
Grover Norquis says if the Republicans lose the 2012 election, and it's likely they will, then Republicans will focus on Operation Impeach The Niggar in 2014.
If Romney gets the nomination, but loses the general, what will that do to the Republican party?
It will set the stage for the rise of Rand Paul...the most dangerous man in American politics.
OK, but how will the party look four years later? More conservative (tea party) or more moderate (Romneid)? Would the conservatives go the third party route and throw in the towel with the Republican establishment? I really do not have a clue, just interested in what others think.Nothing.
If they could recover from 1964 in just four years anything is possible.
OK, but how will the party look four years later? More conservative (tea party) or more moderate (Romneid)? Would the conservatives go the third party route and throw in the towel with the Republican establishment? I really do not have a clue, just interested in what others think.
There were several commentators in 2004 suggesting Obama had a chance at the presidency.It's difficult to say.
There was huge blood letting in 1964 between the Eastern Establishment (Nelson Rockefeller) and Barry Goldwater and the conservatives. Nixon tied it all together in 68' with the help of Vietnam and Wallace's draw on southern Democratic voters.
Four years is a life time in Presidential politics. Someone could well emerge and steal the show. Who knew that Obama's 2004 Keynote Speach would have launched him as it did on the national stage.
I suspect Tea Party, evangelicals, moderates and neo-conservatives can settle on someone. For the moment, it's simply not clear who that someone is.
Rand Paul's representing Kentucky, no one will take him seriously as long as that state remains the backward ass shithole it is now.
Keep shaken and baken that Meth.
Which is why I wonder why so many people take Newt Gingrich so seriously. He is from Ga. And Ga has never been the economically balanced darling of the South.![]()
It was one of the 13 original colonies/states.
Atlanta's not a joke of a city.
You have the precedent of the "Peanut Farmer."
What does that have to do with a Presidential nomination of today? Georgia may bring in money, but it has no freaking idea how to use it. Let alone how to balance the states debt/budget. The GA state debt is an economical joke. You really think Newt looks good in that light?
You've identified the essence of the Republican problem.
What is their "establishment" in 2012? Is it Wall Street, the Tea Party, evangelicals, neo-cons, what?
One thing is clear, it's no longer what Nixon called the "Silent Majority."
I think the GOP's biggest problem is social issues. I think a lot of independents would say they side with Republicans fiscally but Democrats on issues like gay rights, pro-choice, and religious freedom.
Independents are more likely to vote republican when the focus is on money, but if the candidate starts making sweeping statements about overturning roe v wade or prayer in schools then the independents start reevaluating the other contender.
to me its like, hey we pass laws supporting a woman's right to choose, uh....can we move on? It turns me off as well, but 1.7% growth and Diane Sawyer lobbing soft questions at Obama, I gotta vote for change....that is, get rid of Obama!