Here's the thing: What the UltraChads of the world call "Porn" is, basically any books with GLBT characters, regardless of whethere there is any actual sex depictions in it. OR (Even worse) books that simply have non-white characters.
THESE are the types of books now being challenged as "Porn" by the BotanyChads of the world, and I know this because this is what is happening in my state.
Most LOGICAL people realize this is not porn. UltraChad of course is not logical with the things he says, or posts.
When I was 12, I read a book that had very detailed descriptions of sexual acts in it, as well as detailed explanations of what happenes during puberty. The book was called "Preparing for Adolescence." It was, as you would expect, a self- help book for teens as they transitioned to adolescence and the difficulties and changes to their bodies they could expect.
The author was James Dobson. A man noted for being part of the Christian Right- you know, the type who would eagerly support Project 2025.
Except, one small problem: That book was published in the 1980s and was considered an acceptable reference work for young people- especially with it's religious leanings. Today, it would be banned from school libraries and considered "pornography."
This is what is called "Collateral Damage." And one of many examples of what is wrong with Project 2025.
THESE are the types of books now being challenged as "Porn" by the BotanyChads of the world, and I know this because this is what is happening in my state.
Most LOGICAL people realize this is not porn. UltraChad of course is not logical with the things he says, or posts.
When I was 12, I read a book that had very detailed descriptions of sexual acts in it, as well as detailed explanations of what happenes during puberty. The book was called "Preparing for Adolescence." It was, as you would expect, a self- help book for teens as they transitioned to adolescence and the difficulties and changes to their bodies they could expect.
The author was James Dobson. A man noted for being part of the Christian Right- you know, the type who would eagerly support Project 2025.
Except, one small problem: That book was published in the 1980s and was considered an acceptable reference work for young people- especially with it's religious leanings. Today, it would be banned from school libraries and considered "pornography."
This is what is called "Collateral Damage." And one of many examples of what is wrong with Project 2025.
That never happened during the last pandemic.
