Who said liberals aren't mentally ill?
www.nationalreview.com/article/446012/feminist-columnist-stay-home-moms-illegal-australia
www.nationalreview.com/article/446012/feminist-columnist-stay-home-moms-illegal-australia
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are these crazy-ass loons, too.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...requirement-is-essential-to-healthcare-reform
What does that have to do with the OP?
Focus, dude.
Who said liberals aren't mentally ill?
www.nationalreview.com/article/446012/feminist-columnist-stay-home-moms-illegal-australia
Now, Marquand tried to support her position by claiming that stay-at-home-moms have an unfair advantage when it comes to things like welfare assistance and tax breaks. Whether this true or not, it still doesn’t justify her argument. She is, after all, not calling for her rule to apply only in these situations, nor is she calling for it to apply only for these reasons. She’s saying that all people should be forced to go to work, even if they do have the financial means to survive as a single-income family without any government assistance, and even if they did not have any kind of tax breaks, because that is the only way for workforce participation to be “equal.”
It's about the provision in the GOP's laughable, failing health care bill, which requires Medicaid recipients to hold down jobs.What does that have to do with the OP?
Focus, dude.
It's about the provision in the GOP's laughable, failing health care bill, which requires Medicaid recipients to hold down jobs.
It's about the provision in the GOP's laughable, failing health care bill, which requires Medicaid recipients to hold down jobs.
Besides echoing the OP's points, it completely leaves out the possibility of home-schooling children. I guess they forgot about that part of their constituency.
No, it isn't. Read the actual article, and not the National Review spin.It's not man you didn't click on the link
It's in Australia and about staying home after kids are adults.
It is a tad commie. Coz it's removing a type of a social value; a tad.
It's not man you didn't click on the link
It's in Australia and about staying home after kids are adults.
It is a tad commie. Coz it's removing a type of a social value; a tad.
No, it's about your inability to understand anything, so you throw in a red herring to try and make yourself appear intelligent.
It doesn't work.
It worked very well in this case.
No, it isn't. Read the actual article, and not the National Review spin.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/re...m/news-story/fbd6fe7b79e8b4136d49d991b6a1f41c
If you ask Phrodope the color of the sky he'll say 5:45 PM.