Ideas for exposing wife

[amofiga]

Do Not Do This Without Consent.

If you flash other people without their explicit consent, you are basically visually raping them. Not polite, not anything remotely within the range of SSC and it's something that if you get caught at it, can send you BOTH to jail. I sincerely doubt you want a rap sheet just because you thought it would get your jollies off.

Go to a fetish/bdsm/swingers party where nudity is allowed/expected/desired. Flash away to your heart's content. The LAST thing you want is doing this shit in public while kids are around for God's sake. Be smart about your fetishes, don't end up exposing innocent eyes (or eyes that want nothing to do with it) to this level of selfish crap.

Are you serioius....visual rape? I'm not casting doubt and I know that if a man flashes or exposes himself in public, he can certainly be brought up on misdemeanor charges and will probably get a fine, slap on the hand, and perhaps an order for therapy. However, given a scene in a bar or "accidentally" bending over in a short skirt? First off, if a guy sees this, I sincerely doubt he will report it to the authorities. He'll be too busy enjoying it. If somebody does say something about the woman who bent over or rode an escalator not wearing panties, is there a low that says women must wear panties? Perhaps the person who just happened to look up her skirt should be the one arrested as a "peeping tom".

I'm not busting your chops, but given the amount of armed robbery and drive by shootings, I'd hope that a woman giving a little accidental "peek-a-choo" wouldn't be thrown in jail. Dogging....that's a different story.

 

[satindesire]

Thanks for the info, I was about to try and show my wife's pussy to a school bus driver....give me a break. I am well aware of the risk and consequences of these actions. I am sure that if we decide to do this, we will choose an appropriate place far away from children or others with innocent eyes. Maybe I was not specific enough in my wording of this thread. A big part of the turn on is to choose individuals who would enjoy what we are doing.

Your first post in this thread was:

Can someone give me some ideas about where and how to casually and/or "accidentally" expose my wife to other men. My wife lost a bet to me and I think it would be a turn on to do this. Any ideas or personal experiences would be appreciated.

You were explicitly looking for ideas about where and how to Casually or "accidentally" expose your wife's nudity to "other men". You did not specify that you were seeking to do this in a consensual manner in a place that it was acceptable and safe, and I specified that for you. If you weren't going to nonconsensually expose other people to your kinks for your own selfish sexual enjoyment, then you have no reason to get upset. My advice naturally doesn't apply to you. But since you DID get upset, I'm guessing I struck a nerve because you -WERE- looking to do those things.

The truth hurts.

For further painful truths, see StrayKat's stressor on the fact that consensual exposure is the KEY to making your fetish respectful of the fact that some people WILL NOT APPRECIATE BEING INVOLVED WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION.

You were looking for ideas and she gave you the best one:
Everything else said may very easily involve unwilling participants, but you didnt seem to have any objections to others
I am not a school bus driver nor a minor, yet I dont want to see just about every pussy or tits out there flashing at me in public. I am sure there are more people like me who dont think about sex 25/7 and who find it actually appalling to be involved in someones sexual activities when they didnt expect nor consent to it.

Are you serioius....visual rape? I'm not casting doubt and I know that if a man flashes or exposes himself in public, he can certainly be brought up on misdemeanor charges and will probably get a fine, slap on the hand, and perhaps an order for therapy. However, given a scene in a bar or "accidentally" bending over in a short skirt? First off, if a guy sees this, I sincerely doubt he will report it to the authorities. He'll be too busy enjoying it. If somebody does say something about the woman who bent over or rode an escalator not wearing panties, is there a low that says women must wear panties? Perhaps the person who just happened to look up her skirt should be the one arrested as a "peeping tom".

I'm not busting your chops, but given the amount of armed robbery and drive by shootings, I'd hope that a woman giving a little accidental "peek-a-choo" wouldn't be thrown in jail. Dogging....that's a different story.

Yes, I am absolutely 100% serious.

Why risk it? You can't know for a fact that the person(s) you're exposing yourself or others to will appreciate-slash-enjoy the exposure. Instead of risking jail time and yes, exposing them WITHOUT THEIR EXPLICIT CONSENT, just don't do it. Be SAFE and SANE and CONSENSUAL about your kinks, rather than doing something that is none of the things we uphold as the motto of BDSM/fetish practice.

In a place where nudity is expected and oh gasp! even -welcome-, enjoy exposure/flashing kinks with humor and brevity. Do Not Do This In Public, where you cannot absolutely know that you involving a non-consenting person or not.

I love women and men equally, being pansexual, all permutations of gender are welcome. However, if I'm at a restaurant with my husband, I do -NOT- welcome a woman hiking herself up on a barstool with no panties on as a blatant use of my person without my consent to get HER jollies off. If I'm at a kink party where I know there will be nudity, sure, I have absolutely no issue with it because going there I consent to seeing things like that. Out in "vanilla" life, it's unacceptable to involve nonconsenting people.

 

[StrayKat]

Why risk it? You can't know for a fact that the person(s) you're exposing yourself or others to will appreciate-slash-enjoy the exposure.

Oh but havent you heard, every guy out there gets into a drooling fit at the sight of exposed female genitals

In a place where nudity is expected and oh gasp! even -welcome-, enjoy exposure/flashing kinks with humor and brevity. Do Not Do This In Public, where you cannot absolutely know that you involving a non-consenting person or not.

Maybe that is exactly the problem. In a place where nudity and kinks are welcome they are more or less expected and people know how to deal with them, even more so welcome them and are willing to go a bit further. It sure is not the same thing. Imagine experienced, willing and horny crowd on one side and unwilling, embarrassed passer by on the other - and then try to understand why the second option makes some people feel like top dogs doing something very exciting. The first option would kinda burst their bubble.

However, if I'm at a restaurant with my husband, I do -NOT- welcome a woman hiking herself up on a barstool with no panties on as a blatant use of my person without my consent to get HER jollies off. If I'm at a kink party where I know there will be nudity, sure, I have absolutely no issue with it because going there I consent to seeing things like that. Out in "vanilla" life, it's unacceptable to involve nonconsenting people.

Indeed this.

 

[satindesire]

Oh but havent you heard, every guy out there gets into a drooling fit at the sight of exposed female genitals

God forbid men have the same sort of boundaries and expectations of respect! They're all just a big batch of stereotypical chest-beating walking hard-ons, amirite? Oh, and no man is actually REALLY REALLY gay, all men Looooooooove pussy! Especially Surprise pussy! It's like their birthday allofasudden! Yay! Pussy!

Maybe that is exactly the problem. In a place where nudity and kinks are welcome they are more or less expected and people know how to deal with them, even more so welcome them and are willing to go a bit further. It sure is not the same thing. Imagine experienced, willing and horny crowd on one side and unwilling, embarrassed passer by on the other - and then try to understand why the second option makes some people feel like top dogs doing something very exciting. The first option would kinda burst their bubble.

Yes, I was getting this from the post as well. Oh, I'm breaking the rules! I'm being disrespectful of other people's boundaries for the sake of my own sexual gratification!!!

It smacks of a level of sexual immaturity that stems from extreme self-absorption.

Wake up and smell the tofu brains, OP. The world doesn't revolve around your penis.

 

[Rolando2]

GEEZ! just strap a mattress to her back, tie a sign around her neck that reads "CURB SERVICE"take her to a truck stop or a popular night clubhttps://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-xIDj_KdH0Aw/TT8BK2S29kI/AAAAAAAABaw/t0-Fk1XrfH4/s187/27879397.gif
..............................................

 

[roomfor1more]

Do Not Do This Without Consent.

If you flash other people without their explicit consent, you are basically visually raping them. Not polite, not anything remotely within the range of SSC and it's something that if you get caught at it, can send you BOTH to jail. I sincerely doubt you want a rap sheet just because you thought it would get your jollies off.

Go to a fetish/bdsm/swingers party where nudity is allowed/expected/desired. Flash away to your heart's content. The LAST thing you want is doing this shit in public while kids are around for God's sake. Be smart about your fetishes, don't end up exposing innocent eyes (or eyes that want nothing to do with it) to this level of selfish crap.

In my honest opinion, visual rape is not a crime and I do not believe it exist as a crime. The legality of flashing varies by jurisdiction. In the UK, as I understand it, flashing is legal as long as no one if offended and if they are then you are hit with a fine. Likewise, I suspect in the US the laws are similar from being tolerated to maybe a few days in jail if you are a repeat offender. Simply put you need to be selective of where you chose to do this and know the laws for the jurisdiction regarding this activity. The last thing you want to do is to expose your wife around children or where there will be a lot of prudish people. Do you research and have some fun with it.

 

[satindesire]

In my honest opinion, visual rape is not a crime and I do not believe it exist as a crime. The legality of flashing varies by jurisdiction. In the UK, as I understand it, flashing is legal as long as no one if offended and if they are then you are hit with a fine. Likewise, I suspect in the US the laws are similar from being tolerated to maybe a few days in jail if you are a repeat offender. Simply put you need to be selective of where you chose to do this and know the laws for the jurisdiction regarding this activity. The last thing you want to do is to expose your wife around children or where there will be a lot of prudish people. Do you research and have some fun with it.

It's not just about the legality issue. It's morally repugnant to expose unwilling people into a fetish they did not consent to.

It's not okay to walk up to a person and hit them with a flogger just because you like to flog people.

It's not okay to walk up to a person and force them to put on a dress just because you like to see a person in a dress.

Consent it critical. If you involve unwilling people you are doing the moral equivalent of assault.

 

[jaF0]

You can't possibly be serious.

 

[amofiga]

Once again a thread seems to have gotten off onto another tangent. What started as a simple request for suggestions of how to expose one's wife for a little fun and tittilation has evolved into a discussion of the morality of exposing one's genitals to unsuspecting people. It would be nice if most of the threads remained on topic and some of the other opinions and judgements are put on the back burner.

Admittedly, exposing oneself in public carries some risks relative to fines or possible short jail time. However, if one wants to take that risk, so be it. Admittedly not everyone is excited or tittilated or shocked or enjoys seeing someone expose themselves, but it's this shock that it is this very shock that is the impetus for someone to want to do it. It's basically like any "practical joke". Yes it would be wise to avoid such activity in a school yard full of elementary students. However, in the context of a bar or night club or even an "adult" type restaurant, the shock and surprise can be a hoot. I once had a lady friend excuse herself to go to the bathroom during lunch and when she came back, she dropped her panties in my lap. Appropriate behavior in a resturant......certainly not. A good tittilating surprise that got my attention....absolutely.

 

[Jringo21]

Once again a thread seems to have gotten off onto another tangent. What started as a simple request for suggestions of how to expose one's wife for a little fun and tittilation has evolved into a discussion of the morality of exposing one's genitals to unsuspecting people. It would be nice if most of the threads remained on topic and some of the other opinions and judgements are put on the back burner.

Admittedly, exposing oneself in public carries some risks relative to fines or possible short jail time. However, if one wants to take that risk, so be it. Admittedly not everyone is excited or tittilated or shocked or enjoys seeing someone expose themselves, but it's this shock that it is this very shock that is the impetus for someone to want to do it. It's basically like any "practical joke". Yes it would be wise to avoid such activity in a school yard full of elementary students. However, in the context of a bar or night club or even an "adult" type restaurant, the shock and surprise can be a hoot. I once had a lady friend excuse herself to go to the bathroom during lunch and when she came back, she dropped her panties in my lap. Appropriate behavior in a resturant......certainly not. A good tittilating surprise that got my attention....absolutely.

Well said, thank you.

 

[Eilan]

It would be nice if most of the threads remained on topic and some of the other opinions and judgements are put on the back burner.

Lit may be a "porn board," but that doesn't mean all kinks should automatically be accepted and validated. Because it's a discussion board, there will be discussion, and no one's obligated to blow sunshine up anyone else's ass. I'll judge others when I deem it appropriate--and involving other people in your kink without their consent is certainly inappropriate.

People who have a problem with other Litsters' "opinions and judgements" can make liberal use the Ignore function that vBulletin has so generously provided.

 

[satindesire]

Once again a thread seems to have gotten off onto another tangent. What started as a simple request for suggestions of how to expose one's wife for a little fun and tittilation has evolved into a discussion of the morality of exposing one's genitals to unsuspecting people. It would be nice if most of the threads remained on topic and some of the other opinions and judgements are put on the back burner.

Admittedly, exposing oneself in public carries some risks relative to fines or possible short jail time. However, if one wants to take that risk, so be it. Admittedly not everyone is excited or tittilated or shocked or enjoys seeing someone expose themselves, but it's this shock that it is this very shock that is the impetus for someone to want to do it. It's basically like any "practical joke". Yes it would be wise to avoid such activity in a school yard full of elementary students. However, in the context of a bar or night club or even an "adult" type restaurant, the shock and surprise can be a hoot. I once had a lady friend excuse herself to go to the bathroom during lunch and when she came back, she dropped her panties in my lap. Appropriate behavior in a resturant......certainly not. A good tittilating surprise that got my attention....absolutely.

It's not a tangent. Fetishes are only okay when done with consent, and this is a place where fetishists can come and learn HOW to do their fetishes in a way that will give them the things they need to be happy WHILE STILL BEING A GOOD CITIZEN and thoughtful to other people.

It's not off topic. At all. The first ideas the OP got were all about how to expose his wife's nudity in risky ways that did not promote consent. The OP never spoke any kind of negativity towards those ideas, only to ME when I finally spoke up about the issues of consent and when I told him where he could SAFELY expose his wife without offending anyone and nonconsensually involving them in their own selfish practices.

He jumped on me, and now this has turned into a fight between people who are okay with nonconsent and people who aren't self-absorbed enough to think everyone on the planet will go along happily with their kinks.

I'm a very attractive young woman. I'm sure if I kissed 100 men, probably a solid 70% of them would be happy about it. The other 30% wouldn't. IT DOESN'T MAKE IT OKAY FOR ME TO KISS THEM just because "most" men would enjoy it. I'd end up involving people in something they would NOT be okay with, did NOT give consent to and Did Not Want.

Even if only 1 man complained about it, it would still be too many for me to risk it.

I may be a beautiful girl, but I'm not stupid enough to think the world revolves around pleasing me. I'm good enough to know that I have limits, and so do other people, so I should respect them as FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS and not do anything without their permission.

If you want to say that's going too far, you've got your head up your ass.

There are safe and consensual ways to get "fun and tittilation". Consent is the only RIGHT way to do this. If you do it without consent, you're assaulting people and I'd really like to see some karmic revenge.

Maybe my husband who REALLY gets his "fun and tittilation" by bare-handed spanking can hold you over his knee and whale on you until you cry.

It's okay, right? He's ready to risk a fine or jail time for his "fun and tittilation" and since you're okay with nonconsent, you'd be fine with NOT CONSENTING to him, amirite?



Jesus Christ these people are hopeless.

 

[Hiliburn]

The risk of being caught or having another watch an act will always excite and intrigue us. Is there are more proper time or place? Certainly. But I will hope most adults will choose carefully. Wishful thinking, of course! But as I have delveloped an interest in exhibitionism, I cannot condem as thoroughly. But I also would want to watch, lol, so my opinion is biased.

 

[infinity706]

I'd just like to say that I agree with satindesire. (Except for the 70% thing. It's probably closer to 95-100% depending on the sample ) Finding people that are ok with your kink is the respectful thing to do.

Now, that being said, I wouldn't personally be offended if I got a free show.

 

[bailadora]

I'd just like to say that I agree with satindesire.

Lawd have mercy! The world is ending!

(Who are you and what have you done with Fin?)

 

[infinity706]

Hey, I actually agree with you, Ms Satin, and Ms Erika the vast majority of the time other than promiscuous sex. It would be hard to count all the agreement, though, because it often leads to me saying nothing at all. It's not like "I agree" adds much to the discussion. It certainly would rack up my post count, though.

 

[WaitWhatt]

I'd just like to say that I agree with satindesire.

Same. I read the original post the same way. "Oops, some random strangers saw my wife". I also took it as doing it somewhere completely inappropriate like a grocery store. Why is offending or disgusting someone a turn on? I guess it's up there with pedophilia and not caring about the kid you're hurting/traumatizing. Makes sense to the one doing it but not anyone else.

 

[fire_breeze]

I'd just like to say that I agree with satindesire. (Except for the 70% thing. It's probably closer to 95-100% depending on the sample ) Finding people that are ok with your kink is the respectful thing to do.

Now, that being said, I wouldn't personally be offended if I got a free show.

Lawd have mercy! The world is ending!

(Who are you and what have you done with Fin?)

Well, Baila, it is 2012

 

[res0n0xg]

It's not a tangent. Fetishes are only okay when done with consent, and this is a place where fetishists can come and learn HOW to do their fetishes in a way that will give them the things they need to be happy WHILE STILL BEING A GOOD CITIZEN and thoughtful to other people.

It's not off topic. At all. The first ideas the OP got were all about how to expose his wife's nudity in risky ways that did not promote consent. The OP never spoke any kind of negativity towards those ideas, only to ME when I finally spoke up about the issues of consent and when I told him where he could SAFELY expose his wife without offending anyone and nonconsensually involving them in their own selfish practices.

He jumped on me, and now this has turned into a fight between people who are okay with nonconsent and people who aren't self-absorbed enough to think everyone on the planet will go along happily with their kinks.

I'm a very attractive young woman. I'm sure if I kissed 100 men, probably a solid 70% of them would be happy about it. The other 30% wouldn't. IT DOESN'T MAKE IT OKAY FOR ME TO KISS THEM just because "most" men would enjoy it. I'd end up involving people in something they would NOT be okay with, did NOT give consent to and Did Not Want.

Even if only 1 man complained about it, it would still be too many for me to risk it.

I may be a beautiful girl, but I'm not stupid enough to think the world revolves around pleasing me. I'm good enough to know that I have limits, and so do other people, so I should respect them as FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS and not do anything without their permission.

If you want to say that's going too far, you've got your head up your ass.

There are safe and consensual ways to get "fun and tittilation". Consent is the only RIGHT way to do this. If you do it without consent, you're assaulting people and I'd really like to see some karmic revenge.

Maybe my husband who REALLY gets his "fun and tittilation" by bare-handed spanking can hold you over his knee and whale on you until you cry.

It's okay, right? He's ready to risk a fine or jail time for his "fun and tittilation" and since you're okay with nonconsent, you'd be fine with NOT CONSENTING to him, amirite?



Jesus Christ these people are hopeless.

lololol, i rarely post but just reading this post has so much fail written all over it. get off your fucking high horse.

you're comparing physical assault to flashing? are you fucking high? it seems like you may actually be on drugs.

while this is morally/ethically debatable you come off as a completely conceited person in every goddamn way so why would you expect anyone to listen to you???????????????

"but I'm not stupid enough to think the world revolves around pleasing me"

you sure have this whole forum fooled.

 

[satindesire]

lololol, i rarely post but just reading this post has so much fail written all over it. get off your fucking high horse.

you're comparing physical assault to flashing? are you fucking high? it seems like you may actually be on drugs.

while this is morally/ethically debatable you come off as a completely conceited person in every goddamn way so why would you expect anyone to listen to you???????????????

"but I'm not stupid enough to think the world revolves around pleasing me"

you sure have this whole forum fooled.

It's simple facts. You go ahead and imply I'm not attractive, just because you're pissed off that I'm pointing out that you have the moral compass of a cockroach. You're about as transparent as glass...your whole post is "Oh yeah? Well I think you're UGLY! NAH NAH NAH BOO BOO!"

You're an adult. Time to act like one. Plenty of people respect my opinions on this board. And if you have any sense of reading comprehension, you'll see many other people that aren't me pointed out the fact that flashing someone without their consent is equivalent to assault. It isn't just me that's displaying some common sense. Sorry to disappoint you but this isn't a game. The people that might be involved without their consent in a fetish are HUMAN BEINGS, deserving of the same respect you'd want for yourself.

You don't have to agree with me, and I certainly don't give a shit if you do or not, since I couldn't care less what someone who has no sense of respecting other human beings does in regards to my posts. And I couldn't care less if you think I'm pretty or not, since I don't see any pictures of YOU up here. I'm brave enough to show my face to this place. I have nothing to hide.

So kindly go fuck yourself.

 

[res0n0xg]

It's simple facts. You go ahead and imply I'm not attractive, just because you're pissed off that I'm pointing out that you have the moral compass of a cockroach. You're about as transparent as glass...your whole post is "Oh yeah? Well I think you're UGLY! NAH NAH NAH BOO BOO!"

You're an adult. Time to act like one. Plenty of people respect my opinions on this board. And if you have any sense of reading comprehension, you'll see many other people that aren't me pointed out the fact that flashing someone without their consent is equivalent to assault. It isn't just me that's displaying some common sense. Sorry to disappoint you but this isn't a game. The people that might be involved without their consent in a fetish are HUMAN BEINGS, deserving of the same respect you'd want for yourself.

You don't have to agree with me, and I certainly don't give a shit if you do or not, since I couldn't care less what someone who has no sense of respecting other human beings does in regards to my posts. And I couldn't care less if you think I'm pretty or not, since I don't see any pictures of YOU up here. I'm brave enough to show my face to this place. I have nothing to hide.

So kindly go fuck yourself.

I said you were conceited, where oh where did i say you were ugly, not pretty, etc.

That had NOTHING to do with my post.

I also said this situation is DEBATABLE, which again, you make wild crazy assumptions about what I think.


I was simply commenting on how you come across, as you can see I've been a part of these forums for some time as well and have generally noticed this about you.


You seem like you didn't even read my post, and then went on some insane rant, coming off insecure as all hell.


If you really want me to post a picture so you can critique and insult me I can...

 

[satindesire]

I said you were conceited, where oh where did i say you were ugly, not pretty, etc.

That had NOTHING to do with my post.

I also said this situation is DEBATABLE, which again, you make wild crazy assumptions about what I think.


I was simply commenting on how you come across, as you can see I've been a part of these forums for some time as well and have generally noticed this about you.


You seem like you didn't even read my post, and then went on some insane rant, coming off insecure as all hell.


If you really want me to post a picture so you can critique and insult me I can...

Nine posts in several years means you're either an alt or you're a lurker, which either means you're not familiar with me,or you're a person who DOES know of me and is just using this name as a flame tactic because you're too big of a coward to face me under your actual Lit name.

Go back and read my posting history, and then take a look at your attacks and tell me I'm conceited again. Tell me I'm full of myself and that no one respects or listens to me. Go ahead. I invite you to search at your leisure.

How many people just in this one thread agreed with me? Seems like you're pulling things out of your ass just to try and seem like you're winning this pointless farce of an argument.

Again. Not conceited. Facts. Plain and simple. I'm not insecure, if I was I wouldn't post my face here and I wouldn't call myself attractive, that's ....uh....exactly the OPPOSITE of insecure. I don't think you actually know what that word means, perhaps you should check your dictionary.

I'm pretty sure my looks have nothing to do with this statement and I was using myself as an example. Trying to twist my words against me is useless, I've come up against better wordsmiths than you and chased them off this board, and there's nothing to fight about.

I know I'm right. The other people here know I'm right. The only proper way to go about this fetish is with CONSENT. Period, end of story. If you disagree, you're a fucking closet rapist or something because consent is EVERYTHING in the world of fetish, and you coming here trying to argue that nonconsentual involvement is okay because it's minor is like saying forcing a woman to touch your crotch isn't rape because it was only her hand.

It's a slippery fucking slope, my friend. Don't cross the line and don't fucking invite other people to because it's "just a little minor titillation".

I'm ending this thread with this simple statement that will require no other discussion:

Nonconsent is nonconsent, fucking period.

 

[bailadora]

Hey, I actually agree with you, Ms Satin, and Ms Erika the vast majority of the time other than promiscuous sex.

*scratching my head* I'm pretty sure none of the above have any problems with people having multiple sexual partners, as long as everyone is in the know and consents to the established rules of engagement. It's when lying, cheating and other deceitful behavior comes into play that the fangs and claws come out. Where we appear to disagree most often, Fin, is because you seem to have a higher level of tolerance for those things than most people I know. There's nothing wrong with that, but it does put you at odds with the majority of the other regulars.

Well, Baila, it is 2012

THAT's what it is. *nods*

 

[Mr_Rance]

Thanks for the info, I was about to try and show my wife's pussy to a school bus driver....give me a break. I am well aware of the risk and consequences of these actions. I am sure that if we decide to do this, we will choose an appropriate place far away from children or others with innocent eyes. Maybe I was not specific enough in my wording of this thread. A big part of the turn on is to choose individuals who would enjoy what we are doing.

Dude, I'm in Texas too and you should pm me
R

 

[GiggLeGasm]

having been in the situation where I was set up to unintentionally flash someone.. and later to have found out that there were pictures taken..

I would say that it was probably the beginning of the end for that relationship.

Why on earth would you presume that the problem would be that the viewers would be assaulted.. but not have an ounce of concern for the person you're exposing.

I'm not saying that I haven't chosen to show myself .. but I chose it.