I told you I would look for it and I'm a man of my word

Frimost

Now 40% more Lesbianism!
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
6,706
Ok, last week I had a thread here on this board about female combatants. Then we had a discussion on the Amazons in it and ancient women warriors of antiquity and whether they existed or not….

I told you all that I vaguely remembered something about hearing them finding some evidence of a female gladiator in Britain, but I said I wasn’t sure (although I did admit that I had a good track record when it comes to remembering these sort of things)....


Well here it is oh ye of little faith!
 
PC

"atwitter"? Who uses that word anymore these days? Who are you, Jimmeny Cricket?
 
I'm Hank Kimble, county ag inspector. Open your shirt, I need to check you for mastitis.
 
Frimost, do you ever read anything? If you had read my posts, or hell, even YOUR posts, you would remember that the argument was about you pointing out the ancient society of the Amazons as an example of ass-kicking women in antiquity. I said that the Amazons never existed, they were part of Greek myth, like the centaurs.

You have yet to prove they existed! This article is about some dead woman in Dover, most likely not even a gladiator! Hello! Is anybody in there!
 
Frimost, your breasts are pretty large and inflammed for a male. I suggest a bi-yearly mammogram along with daily breast pumpings, and if those nipples don't return to their normal hue, see an OB/GYN, stat.
 
I knew you were a sick puppy. Of course men love watching women fight. It's a sexual turn on for 'em. The sicker they are, the better they like it.

Moon
 
Pyper said:
, they were part of Greek myth,

Where do you think most myths come from? A sliver of truth blown up out of proportion.

Like the fish gets bigger each time the story is told.

To get true validity of such myths would take a lot of research and documentation. If you're so gung ho about disproving it....show us your validition.

Frankly right now I don't give a shit. Frimost is on a totally different wave length than you right now.

Moon
 
Pyper

Frimost, do you ever read anything? If you had read my posts, or hell, even YOUR posts, you would remember that the argument was about you pointing out the ancient society of the Amazons as an example of ass-kicking women in antiquity. I said that the Amazons never existed, they were part of Greek myth, like the centaurs.

Bullshit, I pointed out it was narrow-minded skeptics like you who also through the city of Troy was just a myth as well. Then I (and other here) gave you an abundant amount of example of real life female warriors in Asia Minor at the time that was the inspiration of the Amazons. You are the idiots here that are only remembering what you choose to remember. So go back and read the thread and keep you're mouth shut until you do.

PC-I have better things to do then reply to you demented turd-licking self (like look at porn). So its time to lock yourself back up in the attic until tomorrow morning and you're daily repast of fish heads.
 
Re: Pyper

Frimost said:

PC-I have better things to do then reply to you demented turd-licking self (like look at porn). So its time to lock yourself back up in the attic until tomorrow morning and you're daily repast of fish heads.

But yet, here you are replying, Ebb.

Remember to massage your man-breasts daily to prevent cysts and other abnormalities. some nipple-leakage is considerd normal during this period. Contact a seamstress and see if she can fit you with a sturdy underwire man-bra.

Good luck.
 
MoonWolf said:


Where do you think most myths come from? A sliver of truth blown up out of proportion.

Like the fish gets bigger each time the story is told.

To get true validity of such myths would take a lot of research and documentation. If you're so gung ho about disproving it....show us your validition.

Frankly right now I don't give a shit. Frimost is on a totally different wave length than you right now.

Moon

Did you even read the thread that this originated in, Loba? I have no reason to disprove that the Amazons existed. There is no proof that they existed in the first place. In Greek myth they were a society that the Greeks battled with, along with giants and centaurs. Shall I now struggle to disprove that ferocious half-man, half-horse rapists existed too?

Sure, there might have been a similar society (highly unlikely, but possible). My problem is that Frimost used them as a point in his argument as if they were a real, fully documented civilization, not just some mythical sidenote.

Frimost is always on a different wavelength...from the rest of the world I think.

By the way, Viene la Loba would make a way better title for you.
 
Frimost, in the one thread that you're talking about you asserted that the Amazons were real, that women were genetically programmed to cheat on their husbands with 'manly' men, that men acted the way they do because women have bred them that way, and that if woman ruled the world men would all be stupid and beautiful. Then you bombed your own thread with posts about rich, powerful women who had sex with lots of men to prove some point that no one cared about because they didn’t want to wade through 20 post all by the same person.

Women fight. There, there's something both Pyper and you can agree on.
 
Well if I gotta do all that PC then you at least got to go to your Gynecologist to get that nasty yeast infection of yours looked at.


I came back because i had to find my old thread to link here


The original thread I was talking about

I noticed you were the first to answer PC, somehow I am not surprised at all by this...turds always float to the top. :D
 
Silly Frimost.

The only real reason I'm even here is to watch the women kick your big, pasty ass.
 
that way, and that if woman ruled the world men would all be stupid and beautiful. Then you bombed your own thread with posts about rich, powerful women who had sex with lots of men to prove some point that no one cared about

All to prove a point. Our popular P.C. culture has an erroneous view where women are idealized and that if they were in power they could do no wrong. Those examples were to show men and women were not all that different after all. When given license to act without consequences and without judgment gender makes little difference. When given absolute power or close to it as they were women will abuse it just as easily as men both politically and sexually.

Now, I didn't say that men would be chosen solely for beauty in a matriarchal society, that was todd (I think). However, I also thought it was brash to so easily ignore the theory and brush it off so easily as well.

I don't know what a matriarchal society would truly be like, that is why I asked the question. I DO know what it would NOT be though. Given the circumstances I suspect that not an incredibly whole lot would change given the opportunity if they (women) ruled us. It would probably be a case of “the more things change, the more they stay the same” and “meet the old boss, same as the old boss”
 
Last edited:
Back
Top