I just GOTTA know!

zephrbabe

Experienced
Joined
Apr 23, 2001
Posts
85
A simple question for you all:

Do you (assuming the reader goes for guys, or, if not, in purely scientific interest) prefer circumcised or uncircumcised penises? Why?

This question has always dogged me: is there one preference over another? I know more doctors suggest circumcision than not, but I also have discovered that an uncircumcised cock is more sensitive, and I, virgin as I am, don't have a strong opinion of my own. (Otherwise, you can rest assured I would voice it. :devil: )

-Kathryn
:nana:
 
Ever since my grade 2 best friend's younger brother turned his willy inside out, I've had a thing for circumcised. :D
 
wishfulthinking said:
Ever since my grade 2 best friend's younger brother turned his willy inside out, I've had a thing for circumcised. :D
Do you mind? I'm having breakfast here. ;)

inside out?!

Anyway, cut or uncut. Once it's in, who cares?

#L
 
This was covered in the story ideas forum, but DEFINITELY cut!!!!

My ex wasn't and ewwww ptttttteeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwyyyyyyyyy!!!!

Sorry, I feel better now :D
 
I like the natural way. Gotta love the way it peels back, revealing a big throbbing head, ready to be licked, then sucked, then completely devoured. :D

Lou :devil:
 
Tatelou said:
I like the natural way. Gotta love the way it peels back, revealing a big throbbing head, ready to be licked, then sucked, then completely devoured. :D

Lou :devil:

Lou you sexy beast, hm, ok bye:D
 
erm......up until tonite i didnt kno the difference but i can now confirm iv obviously only ever seen uncut cock, therfor i hav no preference (yet)
 
zephrbabe said:
Do you (assuming the reader goes for guys, or, if not, in purely scientific interest) prefer circumcised or uncircumcised penises? Why?

This question has always dogged me: is there one preference over another? I know more doctors suggest circumcision than not, but I also have discovered that an uncircumcised cock is more sensitive...snip...

Circumcision is more common in the United States than in Europe. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's the "norm" in America, and definitely NOT the norm in Europe, unless you're Jewish.

Aesthetically, I prefer uncut to cut; I won't go so far as to say cut is a mutilation, but it isnt natural, either. In my experience, those who are uncircumcized do tend to be more sensitive and easily aroused with tactile stimulation. But frankly, it doesn't matter to me if they are cut or uncut, as long as they know how to use it and keep it clean.

P.S. (edited bit) I heard that doctor's in the US reccomend circumcision simply because it's easier to keep the infant's penis clean. Has anyone heard any other reasons why it's the cultural norm in the U.S., and not Europe? I mean, obviously plenty of uncircumcised infants grow up to be men with perfectly healthy penises, so what gives America?
 
Last edited:
Personally? Uncut, every time.

I have NO idea why. Maybe I just have bad associations with the one cut penis I have known.
 
Being uncut myself, I'm personally very pro au naturale. The head of the penis is the most sensitive thing I've ever encountered, and ooh, look: it comes with its own, retractable protective sheath that pulls back all on its own at the height of sex (adding a fair bit of pleasant friction itself) and keeps it from getting all tough and leathery when not in use. What's not to love?

As far as cleaning, I was about 12 when, in the shower, I pulled back the foreskin and thought "I should give that a wash." One scrubs one's butt, one's ears, one's belly-button, and one's foreskin because they all get funky if one doesn't.

Mrs. 420 [Mrs. 420: "Who had no particular opinion before she met you"] looks at a cut cock, and the accompanying scar tissue, and thinks "OW, that looks like it hurts."

But then, we're opinionated [Mrs. 420: "On a NUMBER of subjects."]. ;)
 
Pornofan420 said:
...Mrs. 420 ... looks at a cut cock, and the accompanying scar tissue, and thinks "OW, that looks like it hurts."...
In the recent past I have had an opportunity to inspect a reasonable cross-section of penises of both fashion.

I cannot state with any real authority that one style is more sensitive than the other.

(I should point out — from a purely subjective point of view — that neither can you.)

What I can report, is that I have never encountered a “cut” penis with any “accompanying scar tissue”

Might I suggest that perhaps Mrs. 420 is a trifle delusional?
 
zephrbabe said:
A simple question for you all:

Do you (assuming the reader goes for guys, or, if not, in purely scientific interest) prefer circumcised or uncircumcised penises? Why?

This question has always dogged me: is there one preference over another? I know more doctors suggest circumcision than not, but I also have discovered that an uncircumcised cock is more sensitive, and I, virgin as I am, don't have a strong opinion of my own. (Otherwise, you can rest assured I would voice it. :devil: )

-Kathryn
:nana:

Doctors in the US have changed their views.

Though the majority of male babies born are circumcised, the American Medical Association has published that there is no medical reason for circumcism.

They used to say cancer rates were less, infections were less, venerial diseases happened less. Humph.

Thus, though my husband is cut, we chose NOT to circumcise our son. If our son chooses when he's older, he can have the procedure. It's up to him.

Hospitals still push it, many doctors still expect it, and we are currently in the minority.
 
being english and only ever having sex with one guy i don't have much experience to comment. Though looking at porn (yup i do that a fair bit esp as i review the stuff at the mo) I must say I much prefer the look of a natural penis....circumcised ones just look as if they're in pain to me*L*
 
Virtual_Burlesque said:
*SNIP*

Might I suggest that perhaps Mrs. 420 is a trifle delusional?

I suspect not. We've watched a fair bit of porn. Some circumcisers are more skillfull than others and if you look closely, on many of the guys you can see where the foreskin was cut away. Some guys not so much. But there's usually some evidence of the proceedure having been done.

Mrs. 420 suggest that perhaps you are seeing it and just not recognizing it as such. It's the rare knife that cuts into human flesh and doesn't leave some sort of scar.

Next time you're watching porn, look closely at where the forskin would have been attached on the guy's cock. What do you see?

I remember as a kid with contraband porn mags reading an interview with porn star Lisa Deleeuw where she talked about prefering an uncut cock to a cut one. She was the one who used the term "leathery" in relation to circumcised cocks. Guess it stuck with me.

I do know that for me, if I were to pull back the rain-sleeve and go about my day with it uncovered, I'd go mad. That's the most nerve laden spot on my body and it would be...just unthinkable. Personal preference, I guess.

Here's a fascinating site on the anatomy of the foreskin, including pix of what how it moves during masturbation. :D [full disclosure: it's an anti-circumcision site]
 
Pornofan420 said:
... Next time you're watching porn, look closely at where the forskin would have been attached on the guy's cock. What do you see?...
Sorry.

I do not formulate my conclusions based upon evidence encountered while viewing pornography. All my research is conducted employing real, live . . . er . . . subjects.

Although there must obviously be some scar, I have never encountered one that was noticeable.

Just a thought, but were these porn stars you observed circumcised as adults, perhaps using a unique surgical technique to enhance their appeal in the business?

What I am asking is whether it is possible that they were circumcised with pinking shears so as to procure a frilly dilly?

Anyway, it is inescapable. I need to do much more research.


Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! :D
 
Back
Top