I just did a return at Home Depot, I had to show ID

We well know the dangers of middle-aged, white, jewish men who might vote.

I'd ID them and then refuse them the return or the vote.

I like the "I'd ID" bit, never used that one before today.
 
We well know the dangers of middle-aged, white, jewish men who might vote.

I'd ID them and then refuse them the return or the vote.

I like the "I'd ID" bit, never used that one before today.

for good reason:D
 
See Post #3.

so what YOU are saying is

one NEEDS to have a RECIEPT or show ID

WHY?

and if COLOREDS cant get ID's to vote, then it means they should get the money back if THEY DONT HAVE ID's at HD


RIGHT?
 
so what YOU are saying is

one NEEDS to have a RECIEPT or show ID

WHY?

and if COLOREDS cant get ID's to vote, then it means they should get the money back if THEY DONT HAVE ID's at HD


RIGHT?


What? If you purchased the item and kept the receipt, you'd have no need for an ID at HD, no matter the colour of your skin. If you don't have the receipt and have no ID, they have no reason to take your return - regardless of the colour of your skin.

You see, the store receipt serves as an ID, they issue it to each and every purchaser at the time of purchase.

When you go to each and every potential voter and issue them a photo ID based on their qualification to have one (purchasing a nail or turning 18), then your comparison might become valid - but until you come up with the mechanism to do that, you are just making noise.
 
What? If you purchased the item and kept the receipt, you'd have no need for an ID at HD, no matter the colour of your skin. If you don't have the receipt and have no ID, they have no reason to take your return - regardless of the colour of your skin.

You see, the store receipt serves as an ID, they issue it to each and every purchaser at the time of purchase.

When you go to each and every potential voter and issue them a photo ID based on their qualification to have one (purchasing a nail or turning 18), then your comparison might become valid - but until you come up with the mechanism to do that, you are just making noise.

so a CUSTOMER at HD can get an ID

but a COLORED cant get one and show it to VOTE....and AXING em for ID at a polling station is RACIST
 
What? If you purchased the item and kept the receipt, you'd have no need for an ID at HD, no matter the colour of your skin. If you don't have the receipt and have no ID, they have no reason to take your return - regardless of the colour of your skin.

You see, the store receipt serves as an ID, they issue it to each and every purchaser at the time of purchase.

When you go to each and every potential voter and issue them a photo ID based on their qualification to have one (purchasing a nail or turning 18), then your comparison might become valid - but until you come up with the mechanism to do that, you are just making noise.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CTnVl5JWIAAX9Ov.jpgyour buddy disagrees wiff you
 
so a CUSTOMER at HD can get an ID

but a COLORED cant get one and show it to VOTE....and AXING em for ID at a polling station is RACIST

A customer gets one automatically, nothing required other than purhcase.

A voter does not get one automatically, and must show other IDs to get an ID which is acceptable for voting purposes.

It isn't about race, but the hurdles to getting a valid picture ID are greater for the poor and elderly than for the good white kids who get drivers permits at 16 years of age (and whose parents can afford the insurance, fees and so on).

And if the hurdles weren't great enough, you would demand they be greater. You after all, do wish to prevent blacks from voting and are frightened of all elderly voters other than yourself.
 
A customer gets one automatically, nothing required other than purhcase.

A voter does not get one automatically, and must show other IDs to get an ID which is acceptable for voting purposes.

It isn't about race, but the hurdles to getting a valid picture ID are greater for the poor and elderly than for the good white kids who get drivers permits at 16 years of age (and whose parents can afford the insurance, fees and so on).

And if the hurdles weren't great enough, you would demand they be greater. You after all, do wish to prevent blacks from voting and are frightened of all elderly voters other than yourself.

BS

They need it for FOOD STAMPS, welfare etc

how do they get THAT?

the DUMZ never say POOR or ELDERLY, they always say its RACIST

as if only COLOREDS are so INEPT
 
A customer gets one automatically, nothing required other than purhcase.

A voter does not get one automatically, and must show other IDs to get an ID which is acceptable for voting purposes.

It isn't about race, but the hurdles to getting a valid picture ID are greater for the poor and elderly than for the good white kids who get drivers permits at 16 years of age (and whose parents can afford the insurance, fees and so on).

And if the hurdles weren't great enough, you would demand they be greater. You after all, do wish to prevent blacks from voting and are frightened of all elderly voters other than yourself.

so what you are saying is

if a POOR or ELDERLY:rolleyes: person LOSSES a reciept, they cant get a refund cause they cant get ID's?
 
A customer gets one automatically, nothing required other than purhcase.

A voter does not get one automatically, and must show other IDs to get an ID which is acceptable for voting purposes.

It isn't about race, but the hurdles to getting a valid picture ID are greater for the poor and elderly than for the good white kids who get drivers permits at 16 years of age (and whose parents can afford the insurance, fees and so on).

And if the hurdles weren't great enough, you would demand they be greater. You after all, do wish to prevent blacks from voting and are frightened of all elderly voters other than yourself.

so what YOU are saying

is that the POOR or ELDERLY cant get the following?

http://www.youngcons.com/awesome-24-things-you-must-have-an-id-to-purchase/


or for that matter, buy a book and having it signed by COLORECUNT and CUNTCLINTON....cause they REQUIRED ID's FOR A BOOK SIGNING


btw, I had a THREAD of an NAACP rally AGAINST RACIST ID's, they had a list of things you needa BRING to teh rally....ID included:rolleyes:


WE KNOW WHY

Your HiJab is in too tight
 
so what YOU are saying

is that the POOR or ELDERLY cant get the following?

http://www.youngcons.com/awesome-24-things-you-must-have-an-id-to-purchase/


or for that matter, buy a book and having it signed by COLORECUNT and CUNTCLINTON....cause they REQUIRED ID's FOR A BOOK SIGNING


btw, I had a THREAD of an NAACP rally AGAINST RACIST ID's, they had a list of things you needa BRING to teh rally....ID included:rolleyes:


WE KNOW WHY

Your HiJab is in too tight

No, that isn't what I said, that is what you said that I said. Try harder to stay with me.

I said it is harder for poor people to meet the ID requirements that you wish to impose, I did not say impossible.

They require IDs for all events where Secret Service protected people are the keynote whatever. Try harder there as well. If they desire a poor person in attendance, they obtain one who won't be politically problematic for them and give that person the ID. Perhaps if you'd be willing to go out and help issue the IDs, it wouldn't be an issue.

Why do only republicans want Voter ID, when the instance of proven Voter Fraud is so low as to be negligible? Could it be to limit minority votes?
 
No, that isn't what I said, that is what you said that I said. Try harder to stay with me.

I said it is harder for poor people to meet the ID requirements that you wish to impose, I did not say impossible.

They require IDs for all events where Secret Service protected people are the keynote whatever. Try harder there as well. If they desire a poor person in attendance, they obtain one who won't be politically problematic for them and give that person the ID. Perhaps if you'd be willing to go out and help issue the IDs, it wouldn't be an issue.

Why do only republicans want Voter ID, when the instance of proven Voter Fraud is so low as to be negligible? Could it be to limit minority votes?
bee ess
 
Okay, I am laughing...

;)

I have a LOWE'S card and I did not have to show ID, I just had buy something.
 
Another strong yet fact filled BusyBody rebuttal.

Well stated.

Not everyone can be as intelligent and articulate as you. I mean it. Very well argued/explained/debated. Kudos! Was going to say earlier but thought I would wait until this came to it's inevitable end considering OP.
 
Not everyone can be as intelligent and articulate as you. I mean it. Very well argued/explained/debated. Kudos! Was going to say earlier but thought I would wait until this came to it's inevitable end considering OP.

:kbate:

IS A CUNT!

Is that is what is talking to you?

:D

She is not a switch hitter... (it's its... :eek: )
 
For what it's worth, in Canuckistan, the land of not quite legal pot, legal whores & illegal johns, the land that didn't birth the social justice warrior feminazi politico class but was happy to serve as it's petrie dish...

You need to show ID to vote. And it's the apathetic Millennial whiteys suffering because of it.
 
Back
Top