I certainly hope this isn't the end of Ann Coulter's marketability

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
If I were a major TV station producer I'd give her a 1 hour show on prime time.

What better way can you think of to discredit conservatism?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070311...r&printer=1;_ylt=AqJXs.dcV6k6xCPZ0jrGUky2GL8C

Has Ann Coulter hit her tipping point?

By DAVID BAUDER, AP Television WriterSun Mar 11, 11:56 AM ET

Ann Coulter has been a reliable name for years among people who plan television news shows — an attractive, articulate blonde conservative who's made a living lobbing verbal bombs.

Following her use of a gay slur about Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards this month during remarks to the Conservative Political Action Conference, some on TV are wondering whether her shelf life is expiring.

Many were angered by her use of the "f-word". Coulter later said she considered it a "schoolyard taunt." She said it was a joke about "Grey's Anatomy" actor Isaiah Washington saying he would seek counseling after using the word to refer to a fellow actor.

At least four daily newspapers have dropped Coulter as a columnist, citing her comment about Edwards.

Head-turning remarks are hardly anything new for the author of "Godless: The Church of Liberalism" and "How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)." In "Godless" last year, she wrote of World Trade Center widows: "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much."

"It's a world of `are you talking about me? are you talking about me?'" said Steve Friedman, executive producer of "The Early Show" on CBS. "And eventually you have to get more and more outrageous to be talked about. One day you cross the line and become persona non grata. I think she's getting close. I think Bill Maher is getting close."

Friedman has no plans to book Coulter on his show, but said he had no plans even before her Edwards comment.

Some people on NBC's "Today" show didn't want to see Coulter before she was booked to talk about "Godless" last summer, said Jim Bell, the show's executive producer.

He overruled them. Having only certain points of view would make for a bland program, he said. Since Coulter is a best-selling author, clearly there's an audience that responds to her. Coulter also appeared on a "Today" segment this Feb. 8, debating a University of Pennsylvania professor.

Bell said last week that Coulter's legitimate points of view are beginning to get lost in the noise of being outlandish.

"She sometimes goes out of her way to push some buttons and tends to generate more heat than light," he said. "We love a lively debate, but we would tend to get people who would generate more light."

Said Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism: "You do wonder whether she's destined for `Dancing With the Stars' at some point."

Several conservatives criticized Coulter for her Edwards remarks. Fellow columnist Michelle Malkin lamented that Coulter had tarred the work of people at the Washington conference. She called Coulter's humor "tired old shtick." Tim Graham, director of media analysis at the Media Research Center, said some conservatives envy the attention she gets and dislike how she distracts from legitimate arguments.

"If you got the sense that she was saying things you thought she believed, it would help," he said.

Still, Graham said it would be "outrageous" if Coulter is blacklisted by networks but Maher isn't. The HBO comic angered some by recent remarks suggesting more people would live if an assassination attempt against Vice President Dick Cheney had been successful.

The liberal organization Media Matters for America, which has long campaigned against Coulter, hopes this is a "defining moment" that causes TV networks to turn their backs on her, said spokesman Karl Frisch.

MSNBC once fired Coulter as a regular contributor after a remark she made to a Vietnam veteran. But Coulter has appeared there as a guest on shows and the network has no policy against her.

The remarks "won't stop conservatives from buying her books and her ability to sell books is what drives her bookings on TV," said MSNBC's "Hardball" host Chris Matthews.

CNN had scheduled Coulter to appear with Paula Zahn last Monday. The network said Coulter canceled her appearance.

"We have and will continue to interview provocative guests and ask them tough questions," CNN spokeswoman Christa Robinson said. "We don't have overall bans about anyone. We will book them when we think it is appropriate to do so, on a case by case basis."

The changing nature of cable news may limit Coulter's ability to speak to those who don't already agree with her. Cable talk shows used to be built upon fiery debate, while now there are more shows that take a point of view and depict world events through that prism. Think Lou Dobbs, Keith Olbermann and Glenn Beck.

A spokeswoman for Coulter did not return a call for comment. Coulter, however, did appear on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes" three days after the Edwards remark and belittled the idea that it would do lasting damage to her. It's a cycle, she said: she says something, the same people become hysterical, and that's the end of it.

It's about her 17th allegedly career-ending moment, she said.

"It happens about every six months," Coulter said, "and you're always there to put me on TV, Sean."

___

On the Net:

http://www.anncoulter.com

http://www.mediamatters.org
 
She could only survive as a marketable personality by pushing the envelope. And an apology would only tarnish her image.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.
 
All you liberals ignored Coulter when she called Bush a liar and a loser.
 
Ham Murabi said:
All you liberals ignored Coulter when she called Bush a liar and a loser.

Exactly. That's because her bombastic words and such always took center stage over anything she had to say that made sense. And that's the route she chose.
 
RoryN said:
Exactly. That's because her bombastic words and such always took center stage over anything she had to say that made sense. And that's the route she chose.

My bad. It was Harry Reid who called Bush a liar and a loser. I'll bet Democrats are looking real hard for a new Senate majority leader.
 
Ham Murabi said:
My bad. It was Harry Reid who called Bush a liar and a loser. I'll bet Democrats are looking real hard for a new Senate majority leader.

well, he is a liar and a loser.
 
If should she would just check into rehab it would all be over. Mel Gibson, Britney Spears, one of the current Kennedy's in congress, another former congressman that liked boy interns and on and on. I've never much cared for her and this incident lowered my opinion even more. However, considering the level of bile in Washington I don't see this as a career killer. Anyone remember that Obama was called a "clean" black candidate by his own party. Are the rest dirty? What does clean mean anyway?

The moral outrage is a tornado in a teapot of words said that are pure politics used by both sides.

Which is worse being called a murderer or fag. Hell, I have no idea.
 
Ham Murabi said:
And Edwards is a faggot - as in wuss.
Faggot = wuss. Hmmm. I bet Queersetti could kick your ass.





Then again, everyone else can, too, so I guess that doesn't prove anything.....
 
She's an ass

I'm betting though that she'll survive it just fine.

I'm guessing part of the deal with this latest episode is the tiresome factor. It's more of the same. Personal, biting attacks for no good reason.

Now, she could have used her biting wit to lambaste the Edwards campaign slow response to his bloggers tirades by drawing some analogy about that and stuff he's said in his various campaigns about the republicans. But instead she chooses to insult gays by suggesting that Edwards is one of them and ashamed of it.

But that's how she is and will always be. Shrill, mean, nasty. It is her schtick and as long as there is a market for it, she'll do fine.
 
moana15 said:
I'm betting though that she'll survive it just fine.

I'm guessing part of the deal with this latest episode is the tiresome factor. It's more of the same. Personal, biting attacks for no good reason.

Now, she could have used her biting wit to lambaste the Edwards campaign slow response to his bloggers tirades by drawing some analogy about that and stuff he's said in his various campaigns about the republicans. But instead she chooses to insult gays by suggesting that Edwards is one of them and ashamed of it.

But that's how she is and will always be. Shrill, mean, nasty. It is her schtick and as long as there is a market for it, she'll do fine.
The problem with blasting Edwards and his people is, for every finger that points at him or his people, a hundred point back at right wing bloggers and politicians.
 
Back
Top