I am wearing ass-pants today.
- Thread starter Ms_Lilith
- Start date
plasticman33
Tight Jeans
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 32,694
Awww, let me see!!
G
Guest
Guest
VIXENSHE
are you talking about naked butt jeans? ones that dont have any pockets on the back?
are you talking about naked butt jeans? ones that dont have any pockets on the back?
plasticman33
Tight Jeans
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 32,694
vixenshe said:
Oh Lordy!!! *Wiping brow*
Thrillhouse
Back from the dead
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2002
- Posts
- 1,752
Re: VIXENSHE
Or, better yet, the ones that don't have a back at all. Although it seems those are restricted to Prince, Cher, and, presumably, all other one-named people.
Wait - vixenshe is one name...
ljmo said:
Or, better yet, the ones that don't have a back at all. Although it seems those are restricted to Prince, Cher, and, presumably, all other one-named people.
Wait - vixenshe is one name...
RegisteredTroll
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2002
- Posts
- 845
Honey unless they are made of reinforced steel nothing could make your ass look good.
It has to be less than 72 inches around.
Hog.
It has to be less than 72 inches around.
Hog.
G
Guest
Guest
No. You don't have the bite of unregistered trolls.RegisteredTroll said:
bluntforcemama
Aqua Vulva
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2000
- Posts
- 30,225
Sounds like a bad case of camel toe.
freakygirl
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2001
- Posts
- 27,432
Myst said:
I agree...
Debbie
Persnickety slattern
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2001
- Posts
- 24,213
KillerMuffin
Seraphically Disinclined
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2000
- Posts
- 25,603
This thread is incredibly fascinating. No, seriously. I could almost write a dissertation.
freakygirl
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2001
- Posts
- 27,432
KM has such a way with words.
I
her.
I
her.
KillerMuffin
Seraphically Disinclined
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2000
- Posts
- 25,603
It's like this huge tribe of humanity flocking together to this really funky humanity thing. Part of it is conscious effort but most of it is sooo this transparent instinct that guides and preserves the species in ways that guarantee diversity of the gene pool.
A female puts up some tidbit of sexually attractive information, then interested males flock in, displaying appreciation and vying for attention. Other females notice this and they flock in as well. Only they display either passive~agression or appreciation depending upon their sexual desires. It's like totally textbook and so totally predictable. Social interactions of this sort always go the same way with varying degrees of success on the female's part depending on the female's rank in the social heirarchy.
I've noticed that the same doesn't hold true with males who do similar threads. They put up threads designed to be sexually titillating and other males immediately zoom in with aggression. You can almost see social heirarchy at work in those instances. Females will show appreciation for sexual information, though not the extent that males will show females who do the same thing.
It holds true here that a female can make any sexual overtures she likes and will generally receive a lot of validation for her sexuality. A male cannot do that. His sexual overtures are often rebuffed or attacked, depending on his social status. Lower-status females don't generally see a lot aggression toward their sexual displays whereas lower-status males won't even net an appreciative comment from females.
It's like Mutual of Omaha's Porno Kingdom. After finals, I sent a link to this place to my sociology professor. He went straight for the ampic forum and hasn't been heard from since.
A female puts up some tidbit of sexually attractive information, then interested males flock in, displaying appreciation and vying for attention. Other females notice this and they flock in as well. Only they display either passive~agression or appreciation depending upon their sexual desires. It's like totally textbook and so totally predictable. Social interactions of this sort always go the same way with varying degrees of success on the female's part depending on the female's rank in the social heirarchy.
I've noticed that the same doesn't hold true with males who do similar threads. They put up threads designed to be sexually titillating and other males immediately zoom in with aggression. You can almost see social heirarchy at work in those instances. Females will show appreciation for sexual information, though not the extent that males will show females who do the same thing.
It holds true here that a female can make any sexual overtures she likes and will generally receive a lot of validation for her sexuality. A male cannot do that. His sexual overtures are often rebuffed or attacked, depending on his social status. Lower-status females don't generally see a lot aggression toward their sexual displays whereas lower-status males won't even net an appreciative comment from females.
It's like Mutual of Omaha's Porno Kingdom. After finals, I sent a link to this place to my sociology professor. He went straight for the ampic forum and hasn't been heard from since.
