Humanitarian or savvy businessman?

cloudy

Alabama Slammer
Joined
Mar 23, 2004
Posts
37,997
I'm not sure what to think. I applaud what he's done, but then... couldn't he have helped more people if he'd sold the mansions, and purchased more modest homes for many more families?

I dunno....what do y'all think?

Hawaii homeless family moves into mansion
Japanese billionaire makes homes available to low-income families

HONOLULU - Dorie-Ann Kahale and her five daughters moved from a homeless shelter to a mansion Thursday, courtesy of a Japanese real estate mogul who is handing over eight of his multimillion-dollar homes to low-income Native Hawaiian families.

Tears spilled down Kahale’s cheeks as she accepted from billionaire Genshiro Kawamoto the key to a white, columned house with a circular driveway, a stone staircase and a deep porcelain bathtub. Her family will live there rent-free, but must pay utility bills.

“I’m shocked. I’m overwhelmed,” Kahale said. “From the little box we had to what we have today.”

Kawamoto, whose own eyes started welling up as Kahale cried, handed over two other homes Thursday to homeless or low-income families.

Kawamoto, one of Japan’s richest men, said he plans to open eight of his 22 Kahala homes to needy Hawaiian families. They will be able to stay in the homes for up to 10 years, he said.

Native Hawaiians are disproportionately represented among the state’s homeless and working poor.

Kawamoto owns dozens of office buildings in Tokyo under the name Marugen and his been buying and selling real estate in Hawaii and California since the 1980s.

He has been criticized for evicting tenants of his rental homes on short notice so he could sell the properties, as in 2002 when he gave hundreds of California tenants 30 days to leave.

Two years later, he served eviction notices to tenants in 27 Oahu rental homes, mostly in pricey Hawaii Kai, saying they had to leave within a month. He said he wanted to sell the houses to take advantage of rising prices.

Kawamoto selected the eight low-income families from 3,000 people who wrote him letters last fall after he announced his plan. He has said he tried to pick working, single mothers.

‘This is pocket money for me’

Giving away mansions shows more dedication to helping Hawaii’s homeless than just handing out wads of cash, he said. Asked whether he was concerned about losing money on the effort, he laughed and said: “This is pocket money for me.”

Kahale’s new house is worth nearly $5 million, an average price for the mansion-like dwellings on Kahala Avenue. It is one of the more modest homes in the neighborhood, many of which feature ornate iron gates, meandering driveways and sculptured gardens.

Kahale became homeless two years ago when her landlord raised her rent from $800 to $1,200, putting the apartment beyond reach of her salary as customer service representative for Pacific LightNet, a telecommunications company. She first stayed with relatives, then moved to a shelter in September.

“What we need to do is appreciate,” Kahale said after getting the keys to her new house. “As fast as we got it, it could disappear.”

Some neighbors are unhappy with Kawamoto’s plan, speculating that he is trying to drive down real estate values so he can snap up even more homes.

“Everyone’s paying homage to him, but in reality, he’s the problem,” said Mark Blackburn, who lives down the street from Kahale’s new home. “Houses are homes. They’re made to live in; they aren’t investment vehicles.”

He suggested that the Waianae Coast, a heavily Hawaiian community on the other side of Oahu that has been hit hard by homelessness, would have been a better place for Kawamoto to carry out his charity work.

Kawamoto countered that those in the Kahala neighborhood who don’t want Hawaiians next door might want to leave the islands altogether.

“The people who don’t want to live near Hawaiians should move,” Kawamoto said.

Lyn Worley, 40, who got the key to another Kawamoto house, said she believes her neighbors will grow to love her family.

The elementary school clerk has been living in a house in Waianae with her five children and brother for the past four years. Their lease ran out — and then Kawamoto’s offer came along.

“We prayed so hard and cried so much for God to drop something from the skies, and he did,” Worley said. “And he did, he really, really did.”
 
People age out of some seemingly cruel behaviors (as in business), so maybe he's more giving than in the past. But I tend to be a cynic and smell "public relations" here.
 
There are certainly more efficient philanthropies possible, as for example Habitat for Humanity, cloudy. We are clearly not to know why this was done, since I notice God got the credit.
 
I guess both parts benefit from this. Kawamoto gets tenants to cover the utility costs and keep the place upand running. They'lll mow the lawn and clean the pool for free, so that the place is in fresh condition when he finds it's the right time to sell it. Then they're out on their asses, with very little rights, since they don't pay rent. But meanwhile, it's a far better deal than having no home at all. I just hope he gives them a proper heads-up for when it's time to move out.

Question is, if he really wanted to use those houses for philantropy alone, shouldn't he let two or tree families share each mansion, with them being so big and luxurious and all?
 
This is a stunt. If he had any compassion in his heart (if he has one, that is) he would stop thinking so much about making even more money (he already has plenty) and start thinking about rehousing for all the families he's fucked up.

This smacks of a guilt trip and a poorly conceived PR stunt.
 
Liar said:
I guess both parts benefit from this. Kawamoto gets tenants to cover the utility costs and keep the place upand running. They'lll mow the lawn and clean the pool for free, so that the place is in fresh condition when he finds it's the right time to sell it. Then they're out on their asses, with very little rights, since they don't pay rent. But meanwhile, it's a far better deal than having no home at all. I just hope he gives them a proper heads-up for when it's time to move out.

Question is, if he really wanted to use those houses for philantropy alone, shouldn't he let two or tree families share each mansion, with them being so big and luxurious and all?

If you know anything about rentals, you would have not asked the last question. One family will maybe keep things up [if not, I would guess that they are out on their asses.] If you have more than one family, the other family is always left to do things.
 
What if any, is the difference between this and, say, Extreme Makeover Home Edition?
 
R. Richard said:
If you know anything about rentals, you would have not asked the last question. One family will maybe keep things up [if not, I would guess that they are out on their asses.] If you have more than one family, the other family is always left to do things.
*shrug* I've lived in a two family home. We said: Left side is yours, right side is ours, with whatever resposibilities that meant. And kept it at that. No different than a community owned apartment building, only fewerpeople einvolved.
 
I suspect this is a crock of shit. If he were truely being humanatrian, he would have sold one of his "multimillion dollar mansions" and used the money to build a low-rent or rent-free apartment building for these people. Instead of one family living in his mansion, he could have 50 or 60 families housed.

I suggest the eviction begins on Monday :rolleyes:
 
Liar said:
*shrug* I've lived in a two family home. We said: Left side is yours, right side is ours, with whatever resposibilities that meant. And kept it at that. No different than a community owned apartment building, only fewerpeople einvolved.

If you have two responsible families living side by side, it works well. However, most of the time one side looks good and the other side is a disaster.
 
Back
Top