how would you deal with a woman who makes false rape allegations?

dolf

Ex porn
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Posts
78,942
long c&p to follow...

Man freed but serial rape accuser remains anonymous
By SAM GREENHILL

Warren Blackwell and his wife Tanya outside the Court of Appeal
HeadlinesFewer boys making the grade in English
Gunman opens fire in Montreal school
Police raids net biggest ever gun haul
The Thick Of It star charged with indecent assault
Caring doctor 'felt guilty over patient's death'
Venezuelan President claims U.S. orchestrated 9/11 attacks
Camilla to risk threat of terror in Pakistan
£130,000-a-week footballer says London is too expensive
New laws to stop Poles eating carp stocks
Nun tried to kill priest after finding him in bed with another woman
Police crackdown on drivers who exploit legal 'loopholes'
Stop school uniform deals that 'cost parents millions' - OFT
Courts use computers to decide who should face death sentence
NEWS HOMEPAGE
Pictures & videoVideo: See clips from the controversial Death of A President
Video: BBC staff in bad-taste Middle East spoof
Gallery: Our eye-catching pictures of the day
Video: The moment a motorist blew up a speed camera
Gallery: See pictures from star studded New York fashion week
Pictures and video: See our choice of the best viral emails around
MORE PHOTOS & VIDEO
An innocent man jailed for a sex attack was dramatically cleared after it emerged that his 'victim' is a serial liar with a long history of crying rape.

But because of laws that protect her anonymity, judges are powerless to name and shame her, leaving her free to make more false accusations against blameless members of the public.

Mr Blackwell, 36, hugged his loyal wife Tanya and wept as the Appeal Court quashed his conviction.

He described his accuser as "every man's worst nightmare".

Mr Justice Tugendhat admitted, however, that similar tragic cases could follow because of the lies of the woman, Miss A.

"Parliament does not seem to have contemplated this situation.

"There appears to be no means of displacing her entitlement to anonymity."

In the 1970s, the Daily Mail campaigned for women in sex cases to be granted automatic anonymity, but now there are questions about whether the law has gone too far.

Warren Blackwell's nightmare began when Miss A, now 38, claimed she had been seized with a knife outside a village club early on New Year's Day 1999, taken to an alley and indecently assaulted.

She later picked Mr Blackwell out at an identity parade.

There was no forensic evidence against him and he had no previous convictions.

'She needs to be stopped'


Yet Mr Blackwell, from Woodford Halse, Northamptonshire, was found guilty and spent three years and four months behind bars.

Eventually the case was referred to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) which assigned Detective Chief Inspector Steve Glover, to investigate. He discovered that the woman:
• Has made at least five other fake allegations of sexual and physical assault to police in three separate forces.
• Was married twice and made false allegations against both husbands - one of whom was a policeman.
• Once accused her own father of sexual assault, but police concluded she had made it up.
• Accused a boy of rape when she was a teenager, only for a doctor to discover she was still a virgin.
• The CCRC concluded that in the case of Mr Blackwell, she had "lied about the assault and was not attacked at all, her injuries being self-inflicted".

The Crown Prosecution Service did not oppose the appeal.

David Farrell QC, for the Crown, said: "This conviction is unsafe. What has come out of the woodwork paints a picture of a woman with immense personal problems with serious difficulties in distinguishing between truth and lies."

If this information had been known at the time of the trial, he added, "this case would not have made it off the ground".

Mr Blackwell said: "Clearly something has to be done about this woman. She needs to be stopped. The prosecution say she is psychiatrically disturbed, but insane people who murder are tried and if found guilty put away."

Mr Blackwell, who plans to sue police over his ordeal, will now have his name removed from the Sex Offender Register.

His accuser has a history of mental illness and self-harm - once inscribing the word 'HATE' on her body with scissors.

However, because she has changed her name at least eight times, and moved between addresses in at least three counties, it seems police never realised they were dealing with the same woman.

For Mr Blackwell, her accusations meant he missed more than three years of family life. His son Liam, ten, and stepdaughter Holly, 16, were three and nine when his ordeal began.

His 36-year-old wife said: "I never doubted him for a second. We were together six years before it happened, and ever since."


----------------------​

not only has she ruined the lives of several men, she has also made it harder for real victime to get justice.

i'd like to see her charged with and jailed for purgery.

what do you think?
 
dolf said:
long c&p to follow...

Man freed but serial rape accuser remains anonymous
By SAM GREENHILL

Warren Blackwell and his wife Tanya outside the Court of Appeal
HeadlinesFewer boys making the grade in English
Gunman opens fire in Montreal school
Police raids net biggest ever gun haul
The Thick Of It star charged with indecent assault
Caring doctor 'felt guilty over patient's death'
Venezuelan President claims U.S. orchestrated 9/11 attacks
Camilla to risk threat of terror in Pakistan
£130,000-a-week footballer says London is too expensive
New laws to stop Poles eating carp stocks
Nun tried to kill priest after finding him in bed with another woman
Police crackdown on drivers who exploit legal 'loopholes'
Stop school uniform deals that 'cost parents millions' - OFT
Courts use computers to decide who should face death sentence
NEWS HOMEPAGE
Pictures & videoVideo: See clips from the controversial Death of A President
Video: BBC staff in bad-taste Middle East spoof
Gallery: Our eye-catching pictures of the day
Video: The moment a motorist blew up a speed camera
Gallery: See pictures from star studded New York fashion week
Pictures and video: See our choice of the best viral emails around
MORE PHOTOS & VIDEO
An innocent man jailed for a sex attack was dramatically cleared after it emerged that his 'victim' is a serial liar with a long history of crying rape.

But because of laws that protect her anonymity, judges are powerless to name and shame her, leaving her free to make more false accusations against blameless members of the public.

Mr Blackwell, 36, hugged his loyal wife Tanya and wept as the Appeal Court quashed his conviction.

He described his accuser as "every man's worst nightmare".

Mr Justice Tugendhat admitted, however, that similar tragic cases could follow because of the lies of the woman, Miss A.

"Parliament does not seem to have contemplated this situation.

"There appears to be no means of displacing her entitlement to anonymity."

In the 1970s, the Daily Mail campaigned for women in sex cases to be granted automatic anonymity, but now there are questions about whether the law has gone too far.

Warren Blackwell's nightmare began when Miss A, now 38, claimed she had been seized with a knife outside a village club early on New Year's Day 1999, taken to an alley and indecently assaulted.

She later picked Mr Blackwell out at an identity parade.

There was no forensic evidence against him and he had no previous convictions.

'She needs to be stopped'


Yet Mr Blackwell, from Woodford Halse, Northamptonshire, was found guilty and spent three years and four months behind bars.

Eventually the case was referred to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) which assigned Detective Chief Inspector Steve Glover, to investigate. He discovered that the woman:
• Has made at least five other fake allegations of sexual and physical assault to police in three separate forces.
• Was married twice and made false allegations against both husbands - one of whom was a policeman.
• Once accused her own father of sexual assault, but police concluded she had made it up.
• Accused a boy of rape when she was a teenager, only for a doctor to discover she was still a virgin.
• The CCRC concluded that in the case of Mr Blackwell, she had "lied about the assault and was not attacked at all, her injuries being self-inflicted".

The Crown Prosecution Service did not oppose the appeal.

David Farrell QC, for the Crown, said: "This conviction is unsafe. What has come out of the woodwork paints a picture of a woman with immense personal problems with serious difficulties in distinguishing between truth and lies."

If this information had been known at the time of the trial, he added, "this case would not have made it off the ground".

Mr Blackwell said: "Clearly something has to be done about this woman. She needs to be stopped. The prosecution say she is psychiatrically disturbed, but insane people who murder are tried and if found guilty put away."

Mr Blackwell, who plans to sue police over his ordeal, will now have his name removed from the Sex Offender Register.

His accuser has a history of mental illness and self-harm - once inscribing the word 'HATE' on her body with scissors.

However, because she has changed her name at least eight times, and moved between addresses in at least three counties, it seems police never realised they were dealing with the same woman.

For Mr Blackwell, her accusations meant he missed more than three years of family life. His son Liam, ten, and stepdaughter Holly, 16, were three and nine when his ordeal began.

His 36-year-old wife said: "I never doubted him for a second. We were together six years before it happened, and ever since."


----------------------​

not only has she ruined the lives of several men, she has also made it harder for real victime to get justice.

i'd like to see her charged with and jailed for purgery.

what do you think?

Why would this guy have even been put in a "line-up" from which she could identify him, in the first place? Just curious.
 
Or, now that the whole world thinks she's a liar, I could rape her and no one would ever believe it.

(I don't really mean this. I think.)
 
Cricket bats are available for ₤ 25 - there is no reason any person should spend any more than that on this woman.
 
Jennifer Kaye said:
Why would this guy have even been put in a "line-up" from which she could identify him, in the first place? Just curious.
i would imagine, it being a small town, that it was just locals who fitted her description.
 
Olivia_Yearns said:
Or, now that the whole world thinks she's a liar, I could rape her and no one would ever believe it.

(I don't really mean this. I think.)
unlikely.

she moves county, changes her name and it's another 3 years of appeal before you get out.
 
dolf said:
i would imagine, it being a small town, that it was just locals who fitted her description.

That in and of itself, strikes me as a violation of rights, in the absense of any charges being laid.
 
She should be jailed and beaten. Not necessarily in that order.
 
kbate said:
Cricket bats are available for ₤ 25 - there is no reason any person should spend any more than that on this woman.
i'm sure there's no shortage of offers to perform that service.

but they can't tell us her name or show us her face...so there's no come back at all.
 
rimmy said:
She should be jailed and beaten. Not necessarily in that order.
i'd say a prison term seems just.
she cost that man's children 3 years from their father...and her getting away with that isn't right.
 
dolf said:
i'd say a prison term seems just.
she cost that man's children 3 years from their father...and her getting away with that isn't right.
The problem with laws like these is that they never seem to consider the chance that someone is lying.
 
rimmy said:
The problem with laws like these is that they never seem to consider the chance that someone is lying.
i'm in favor of the law...which is why she should be charged with purgery.

if she's found guilty of purgery then she should be named.

this way the real victims are still protected but people like her can still be punished.
 
dolf said:
i'm in favor of the law...which is why she should be charged with purgery.

if she's found guilty of purgery then she should be named.

this way the real victims are still protected but people like her can still be punished.
The sooner the better.
 
Jennifer Kaye said:
Why would this guy have even been put in a "line-up" from which she could identify him, in the first place? Just curious.

2 ways to get into an identity parade.

Either you are suspected, by allegation or perhaps some other reason (fitting the description and was in the area is resonable enough, the police can invite you to take part without you being under arrest).

Volunteers. You can be on the list to provide the rest of the parade. You get paid for it and two housemates of mine were on the register when I was a student. If you do get picked, they assume it was a mistake, you don't get arrested.

So Mr Blackwell was under suspicion before the line-up.

In my opinion, she should be prosecuted for perjury. She made a false allegation and lied under oath.
 
ForeverNAlways said:
More than that. She hurt them emotionally in ways that can never be rectified.

The bat's looking better and better the longer I consider this. I think any woman who falsely accuses rape should serve the prison sentence that would have been given to the man had he been found guilty.

In the same jail.

Ok.. maybe that's a little harsh - but at the moment, as I consider those kids, I don't think so.


yet.... if a man in the US rapes a women.... I believe he should be castrated.
 
Highly emotive as the subject of rape is, is that not exactly the same as cutting off a thief's hand?
 
Olivia_Yearns said:
Or, now that the whole world thinks she's a liar, I could rape her and no one would ever believe it.

(I don't really mean this. I think.)

I'm so glad I'm not the only one who was thinking that.

<.<
 
another POV...

i posted this same thead on another board i use...a survivoers board.

the very first reply was from a girl i've known on there for years. she pointed out that with the right bias you could have been telling her story. right down to the cold mother who accuses her of inventing these things.
the mental illnesses that everyone calls out were caused by the trauma of abuse, yet are cited as proof that the abuse is fictional.
she's decided that if she ever is raped again she won't be reporting, for fear of being attacked as a liar, attention demanding, neurotic bitch.

...now i don't know what i feel.
 
Yes, and so far this could indeed be the lady you spoke to. After all they both have the protection of anonymity.

During her allegation and the trial and indeed after the man's prosecution, by all means this woman has the right to anonymity. Because we have the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty, it would be impossible to remove this veil until such time as she was pronounced guilty of perjury (difficult in court, but we have means of protecting vulnerable witnesses such as rape victims and children, why not extend them to the accused here?).

It is not impossible that the original lady in question (I say it that way to avoid confusion with your support board contributor) may indeed be the victim of abuse, either rape or something else, on a previous occaision, but that is not the issue here. If she is demonstrably not a rape victim, she does not have the right to anonymity on these grounds. If she were entitled to anonymity for being involved in rape allegations, why is the same consideration not extended to men accused of rape? Even if found innocent in the first place, the publicity always names them and sometimes even publishes a photo.
 
Back
Top