How to Avoid Homophobic/Close Minded Readers

[JKendallDane]

My views on straight guy instincts - and I'm basing this on me - is that deep down, below conscious thought, the following is true:

1. A guy wants to do anything with someone else's cock, even once, is gay. See previous post.

Let's run with that premise...

Considering most all research from Kinsey forward has shown something in the neighborhood of thirty plus percent of males have had at least one male/male sexual experience that resulted in an orgasm, then you just turned one HUGE chunk of the world gay.

If you add in the incidences of jerk off contests at scout camp, high school coming-of-age situations, and experimentation during college I believe that number would rapidly approach fifty percent.

But feel free to live in your narrow little definition of what it takes for someone to qualify as gay. It's wrong, but that's what's great about life...you are allowed to have your own opinion.

.

 

[Serafina1210]

JKD: Hands isn't trying to tell us what's true, but reporting on what his "hind brain" insists on believing, despite what his fore brain knows to be a fact. I appreciate his honesty, and his self-deprecating sense of humor.

To revisit a topic briefly touched on, I remember reading some time ago about the kinds of porn women like to watch: there was a study reported in numerous news stories in 2014. Lesbian sex, gay male sex, anything involving big dicks. I was, to say the least, not surprised to learn this.

 

[sr71plt]

I keep it pretty simple. Sex is sex is sex, and basically we're all bi--with men being particularly susceptible to it because for some Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus peculiarity, men's sexual satisfaction doesn't go as far beyond the orgasm as women's does and is more urgent in search of that orgasm.

 

[BuckyDuckman]

A friend of mine is a bi female. I've had lengthy conversations with her about it, and teased her about being a lesbian with a fetish for submission to males. (But in her case I think I had it close to right; she wasn't very interested in dicks. She liked being spanked by dominant males and then told to go down on females).

Let me point out that what I wrote about the straight view of gay behaviour is a sort of a hind-brain view of sexuality. Consciously I Get that there are males who are into males, and for that matter there's someone who's into just about anything imaginable. But conscious thought is learned behaviour we use to paper over what our instincts really believe. We need that wallpaper - instincts can be nasty things. But it's the instincts that really define our gut reactions and longings.

My views on straight guy instincts - and I'm basing this on me - is that deep down, below conscious thought, the following is true:

1. A guy wants to do anything with someone else's cock, even once, is gay. See previous post.

2. Lesbians don't actually exist. When you see two girls licking each other up, what you're "really" seeing is two girls so desperate for sexual pleasure they'll actually use other women. They don't love each other because women are defined by their interest in men, just as men are defined by their interest in women. (CAVEAT! This is what I think instincts believe, not what I think anyone should consciously believe!) "Lesbians" getting it on really represent two desperate pussies, and if a guy stepped into the scene they'd be all over him.

Actual lesbians, of course, find that "thinking" insulting. I cant' blame them. But when you look at all the lipstick lesbian videos online, it's obvious they're mostly produced for the male audience, and some of them "go all the way" and put a male in the scene by the end. But for a straight guy, the male actor is always implied. Lesbianism makes no sense because pussies are for cock. Period.

Much of my writing takes the deliberately provocative view that most people (all the straight ones and many of the bi ones) have those genetically transmitted instincts, wired right in. We're taught to paper over them with ideas on tolerance, self-control and decency, but they don't go away. So I write characters that don't bother with the papering over, and act like what instinct says they should act like.

It slams the hindbrain; women in particular masturbate to my stories like crazy, even while some are trying to intellectually reject the fundamental premise. I have a lot of straight female readers, a number of bi female readers, and a fair share of straight male readers - but I suspect very few gay readers. They have different instincts and my writing probably does very little for their hindbrain, and nothing for the rest of their brain.

Add to all this, the fact that women find each other pretty, while (straight) males don't give a fuck what any other male looks like. This fact causes a lot of confusion. If Joe hears Susie say that Eva's pretty hot, Joe's first instinct is to tell Susie to invite Eva to bed with them. Of course it is. Males are wired to fuck as many females as possible; and 2 >> 1. Susie, of course, didn't mean that at all, and she's busy working out what's Eva's done with her hair to make her look so hot. If Susie IS so fascinated by Eva that her thoughts go sexual - in other words, if Susie is bi - then she's probably thinking about getting Eva alone, with Joe nowhere nearby - because in her fantasies, she doesn't want Eva distracted by Joe's cock, which *of course* Eva would be.

Upshot, straight males will assume that any guy liking cock is 100% gay, but can maybe sort of grasp (heh heh) bisexual females, especially if it might get him two girls in bed. I mean girls do seem to find each other hot so maybe they're all bi, right? I mean lesbians can't really exist so they must be bi. Because there's no conceivable, possible world in which cock isn't what it's all about.

So sayeth the straight male hindbrain.

Hands, I appreciate your candor. I don't agree with your hindbrain, but I appreciate the insight. I find the dual standard toward lesbians especially interesting.

In these days where we're being led to believe people can choose their gender through self-identification, I will submit this alternative theorem: Though I may have enjoyed another man's prick, since I self-identify as heterosexual, the rest of the reasoning world is now required to accept that I am straight.

I'm glad we got that worked out. Not sure how that helps anyone with where to post their stories, but I feel better.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

These aren't "instincts" "genetically wired in."

Instincts don't "believe" such complex things. Instincts don't "believe" at all. These are just thoughts that have become automatic and habitual. Mostly, they are ideology and indoctrination, unexamined and unquestioned. You can call that a "hindbrain" if you want, but it's not something handed down by god in the womb.

Yes, while the infant brain is in formation, along with "fire = draw back" there's "Any guy who wants to suck a cock is gay, little one." Perhaps we are all "genetically wired" to be racists.

On the other hand, let's say you're right.

A lot of people, women in particular, masturbate like crazy to my stories. That means they must have incestuous desires "genetically wired in" to their brains, according to your logic.

A friend of mine is a bi female. I've had lengthy conversations with her about it, and teased her about being a lesbian with a fetish for submission to males. (But in her case I think I had it close to right; she wasn't very interested in dicks. She liked being spanked by dominant males and then told to go down on females).

Let me point out that what I wrote about the straight view of gay behaviour is a sort of a hind-brain view of sexuality. Consciously I Get that there are males who are into males, and for that matter there's someone who's into just about anything imaginable. But conscious thought is learned behaviour we use to paper over what our instincts really believe. We need that wallpaper - instincts can be nasty things. But it's the instincts that really define our gut reactions and longings.

My views on straight guy instincts - and I'm basing this on me - is that deep down, below conscious thought, the following is true:

1. A guy wants to do anything with someone else's cock, even once, is gay. See previous post.

2. Lesbians don't actually exist. When you see two girls licking each other up, what you're "really" seeing is two girls so desperate for sexual pleasure they'll actually use other women. They don't love each other because women are defined by their interest in men, just as men are defined by their interest in women. (CAVEAT! This is what I think instincts believe, not what I think anyone should consciously believe!) "Lesbians" getting it on really represent two desperate pussies, and if a guy stepped into the scene they'd be all over him.

Actual lesbians, of course, find that "thinking" insulting. I cant' blame them. But when you look at all the lipstick lesbian videos online, it's obvious they're mostly produced for the male audience, and some of them "go all the way" and put a male in the scene by the end. But for a straight guy, the male actor is always implied. Lesbianism makes no sense because pussies are for cock. Period.

Much of my writing takes the deliberately provocative view that most people (all the straight ones and many of the bi ones) have those genetically transmitted instincts, wired right in. We're taught to paper over them with ideas on tolerance, self-control and decency, but they don't go away. So I write characters that don't bother with the papering over, and act like what instinct says they should act like.

It slams the hindbrain; women in particular masturbate to my stories like crazy, even while some are trying to intellectually reject the fundamental premise. I have a lot of straight female readers, a number of bi female readers, and a fair share of straight male readers - but I suspect very few gay readers. They have different instincts and my writing probably does very little for their hindbrain, and nothing for the rest of their brain.

Add to all this, the fact that women find each other pretty, while (straight) males don't give a fuck what any other male looks like. This fact causes a lot of confusion. If Joe hears Susie say that Eva's pretty hot, Joe's first instinct is to tell Susie to invite Eva to bed with them. Of course it is. Males are wired to fuck as many females as possible; and 2 >> 1. Susie, of course, didn't mean that at all, and she's busy working out what's Eva's done with her hair to make her look so hot. If Susie IS so fascinated by Eva that her thoughts go sexual - in other words, if Susie is bi - then she's probably thinking about getting Eva alone, with Joe nowhere nearby - because in her fantasies, she doesn't want Eva distracted by Joe's cock, which *of course* Eva would be.

Upshot, straight males will assume that any guy liking cock is 100% gay, but can maybe sort of grasp (heh heh) bisexual females, especially if it might get him two girls in bed. I mean girls do seem to find each other hot so maybe they're all bi, right? I mean lesbians can't really exist so they must be bi. Because there's no conceivable, possible world in which cock isn't what it's all about.

So sayeth the straight male hindbrain.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

My rule is: PEOPLE ARE DUM SHITS AND DETERMINED TO FAIL AND PERISH IN SPITE OF NUMEROUS EXAMPLES OF HOW TO DO IT RIGHT.

Back in 1967 an old psychotherapist alerted me to the ways of the world. MUCH OF WHATS BAD FOR US FEELS GOOD DOING IT. Dumshits always opt to feel good.