How to Avoid AI Rejection

[MillieDynamite]

I don't think the history blocks are the reason. But can't say for sure. Because when I write in historical periods, I include a lot of small period details, but I don't devote many clustered paragraphs together filled with historical descriptions of events.

 

[LetsMisBehave]

Since I started using Grammarly to catch typos and grammar problems, I always include a note that I have used it for those purposes. I can also honestly say I reject the majority of suggestions as they take the personality out of the story - perhaps it helps that I use British colloquialisms and shortcuts in phrasing.
On the historical stuff, maybe the old joke applies - to rely on one source is plagiarism, to use ten is research

 

[Silverback_SM]

Is this still an issue in the English spoken / written part of Literotica? Because it is in the German part and highly frustrating. I also don't see how one can really avoid being classed as AI, when individual tests with AI checkers give 100% human scores. So even if I wanted to re-write my stories (and I'm loath to use any voice than my own), I can't because these checkers don't give me any hints.
To add to my problem is that I wrote the (so far) 4 chapters in parallel, moving out certain scenes to later chapters and also sometimes just feeling more like writing one scene that appears later, chronologically. The first two chapters were published without a hitch, the third that is indistinguishable from the other two in terms of style, has now just been rejected the second time for use of AI. And I don't even use Grammerly or other spell checkers / grammar correction programs.

I'm not sure what help I expect, but I'm sure frustrated.

 

[VerbalAbuse]

I think some of the posts in this thread may have been written by AI...

 

[old_prof]

Is this still an issue in the English spoken / written part of Literotica? Because it is in the German part and highly frustrating. I also don't see how one can really avoid being classed as AI, when individual tests with AI checkers give 100% human scores. So even if I wanted to re-write my stories (and I'm loath to use any voice than my own), I can't because these checkers don't give me any hints.
To add to my problem is that I wrote the (so far) 4 chapters in parallel, moving out certain scenes to later chapters and also sometimes just feeling more like writing one scene that appears later, chronologically. The first two chapters were published without a hitch, the third that is indistinguishable from the other two in terms of style, has now just been rejected the second time for use of AI. And I don't even use Grammerly or other spell checkers / grammar correction programs.

I'm not sure what help I expect, but I'm sure frustrated.

I'm fairly confident that the site does not use the standard AI based on-line AI checkers. They re so bad as to be worse than useless. Ignore what they say. Being LLM based, they fundamentally don't understand what it is that makes LLM generated text feel AI written.

I have no idea what the site does for non-English stories, so I won't comment on that side. Are these a case where Laurel uses someone else as a moderator?

 

[StillStunned]

I think some of the posts in this thread may have been written by AI...

You're absolutely right! If you would like to know, specifically posts 7, 18, 148, 653, January, March and Ghana were written by AI.