How repugnantly corrupt is America's statist federal government?

[BobBalouski]

The 3 branches of American federal government are:

1. Legislative = the law makers.
2. Executive = the law enforcers.
3. Judiciary = the law interpreters.

The framers of the Constitution specifically created the 3 branches to be checks and balances against each other: lest one branch deem itself above the Constitution itself, one or both of the other branches would bring down the repugnant offender back to submission to the Constitution. The framers also foretold that great system of checks and balances would only work if executed by a virtuous people, and that the Republic would be lost if that virtue ever ceased to widely exist, that a nation of objectivelaw would then become a nation of subjective men...

In the United Socialist State of America today, the Legislative branch routinely passes laws that the first Supreme Court Chief Justice tagged "void" because they are totally "repugnant to the Constitution", while today's Supreme Court routinely interprets laws not according to a law's repugnancy to the Constitution (or not), but simply according to each Judge's subjective political/activist views of that law.

And the Executive, which is constitutionally charge with enforcing the laws of the land? Where is the virtue when it REFUSES to OBEY the Law of the Land itself? How can the Department of Justice NOT make one of its own submissive agencies COMPLY with the law? How can any leader in the Federal Bureau of Investigation keep her/his job while refusing to OBEY the law? And how in the world can any Chief Executive be considered anything else but a lame-ass Tool when he - the very top lawman in the entire nation - refuses to ENFORCE the law of the land?

Thus goes the tale of vanquished virtue and a Republic totally lost...

FBI Continues to Skirt Court Order to Turn Over McCabe Communications

For more than two months, the FBI has failed to abide by a judge’s order to turn over all of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s text messages, emails and SMS phone messages to a government watchdog group that has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a former senior FBI special agent. The communications in question are related to McCabe’s wife’s unsuccessful run for Virginia State senate and might also contain invaluable information on McCabe’s role in the Bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server used to send classified information, several former FBI sources and a government official told this reporter.

In January, Judicial Watch, a formidable conservative watchdog group based in Washington D.C., filed a lawsuit against the FBI for the communications on behalf of retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent Jeff Danik. Danik spent more than 28 years with the bureau as a supervisor in the counter-terrorism division and special overseas advisor. Danik filed his original Freedom of

Information Act (FOIA) request in October 2016 for McCabe’s communications. After Danik filed his original FOIA the FBI responded on November 8 and 9, 2016 denying his request. Danik appealed to the Justice Department and in June of 2017 the DOJ wrote that the FBI should search for and turn over any pertinent documents. The FBI still refused to turn over the documents and in January he filed a joint lawsuit with Judicial Watch for the documents.
Advertisement

“They have not produced not one text of McCabe, not one,” said Danik, referencing the bureau. “The government is out of control and it’s astonishing. Do you know what would happen if the government subpoenaed you for information and you didn’t produce records that you had in your possession? You’d go to jail for contempt.”

https://saraacarter.com/fbi-continues-to-skirt-court-order-to-turn-over-mccabe-communications/