How much sex to include in your sex story

I do in fact have a story I can claim that for -- they discuss gradient descent before ending up in bed together.
 
Thinking about it, it should have some degree of stochastic behavior. I didn’t want to dive that deeply into it in a romance
 
I do in fact have a story I can claim that for -- they discuss gradient descent before ending up in bed together.
I am actively writing the sequel to this story. I was having problems with the two of them. I guess I should have tried them using math as pillow talk. But she was already bullying him a bit and she is a much better matmrtician than him.

The original story is Perfect Sunset
 
And thanks for that. It's why I come here. (See reply #42). Unfortunately, most of what I find is just not well done.

No. Four straight (!!!) ads for your little crusade to make everyone else on the site behave the way that you want so that you don't feel ashamed of stuff that you have no reason to be ashamed of. Like srsly. : /
 
No. Four straight (!!!) ads for your little crusade to make everyone else on the site behave the way that you want so that you don't feel ashamed of stuff that you have no reason to be ashamed of. Like srsly. : /
This is getting tiresome.
- How can you possibly know my motivation?
- I'll tell you. My motivation is not to get "everyone else on the site to behave...". As I've expressed, dozens, probably hundreds of times, I endorse the whole range of kinds of stories one finds on Lit, categories, writing styles, etc.
- My motivation is to get people to identify stories as "simple erotica," so I can find them more easily and read them.

I don't know your motivation behind your over-wrought attitude about my "crusade" about simple erotica. It's a puzzle. Sure, it's a crusade. Just not to "get everyone else on the site to behave...". Care to explain your motivation a little more? Just curious.
 
Last edited:
This is getting tiresome.

YOU think I'M tiresome??
- How can you possibly know my motivation?

Because it is abundantly clear in how you repeatedly state your case. I'm not mind reading. I'm not guessing. You are telling me your motivation.

- I'll tell you. My motivation is not to get "everyone else on the site to behave...". As I've expressed, dozens, probably hundreds of times, I endorse the whole range of kinds of stories one finds on Lit, categories, writing styles, etc.

You are completely fine with anyone else writing cheap stroke, but YOUR stroke is BETTER and does not deserve the slag term of 'stroke'. Except that stroke is not a slag term. It is perfectly acceptable to all (except you). You look down on your own genre and so to avoid the shame you want to call by some silly euphemism and you want to force everyone else to start using your silly euphemism too. On top of that you have your diatribe explanation that you have typed out so brilliantly that if you just link everyone a jillion fucking times we will all read it and can't not be convinced of your brilliance! "No, no, no, I don't write strike ... here read this link and learn ... do it ..." Yes, you write stroke. There is nothing wrong with this. Deal with it.

- My motivation is to get people to identify stories as "simple erotica," so I can find them more easily and read them.

You want to make lit a better place by changing everyone else. This is vain and snobby. If you think that forcing others to change so that you can have a better experience, that is arrogant and futile. You'd make a great politician (this is not a compliment). People do what they want, especially on a site like lit which is purely recreation time.

And no one cares. No one is hitting your links. No one will be convinced. No one is hitching a ride with your crusade. Everyone else is fine with 'stroke'. You are the only one ashamed of cheap low stroke. You're the only one who thinks it's cheap and low.
 
Back
Top