How many ways can you photograph the same person?

minsue

Gosling
Joined
Apr 27, 2002
Posts
22,062
Oddly fascinating.

"Floating Girl," aka Nastia365, is a London model who has embarked on a project to take and put up on a weblog a photo of herself every day. So far, 58 days into the effort, the pictures vary greatly in terms of tone, style and (as far as can be with a single model as focus) content. Nastia365 is a slender blonde, quite beautiful from a traditional perspective, but manages somehow to carry off an alt.porn appeal. The pictures are often erotic, but only occasionally include nudity. Nastia365 is part of a larger project, CoolGirl365, a collection of photographic and video pieces combining strong sexuality and art.

The format that Nastia365 has chosen is something that may be best-suited for the web medium. A year's worth of pictures, posted daily, allows for a slow evolution of look and presence that would move too quickly as video, and feel too static on the printed page. We the audience get to experience her changes along with her, but can enter the process at any point, catching up (or reviewing) as needed.

This may be one of the kinds of erotic art that has few comparisons offline. Most of what passes for web porn is simply the traditional written, photographic or video format given speed and reach via the Internet. Although the photographs taken of Nastia365 could easily be put on walls or collected into a book, the importance of the Internet as medium in this instance doesn't come from its distribution power, but from its ability to offer both immediacy and memory: we see her changes more-or-less as they happen, putting us in the moment, but never lose a sense of progress and history.
 
I remember going to an exhibit in the mid-90s. It was titled Jane 2000. It was two thousand quite different photos. Of Jane. (The artist's wife, supposedly.) From iconographic to pornographic. Plus one that was an x-ray, and one jammed-into-the-Xerox shot. :)
 
CharleyH said:
I could write a promo like this, it is good promo, but a porn site is a porn site. :)
Tis a good promo, that's why I went there, but it really doesn't come across as a porn site to me on visiting. Just a fascinating collection of photos, some quite good, some quite silly. I likes it.
 
Question is: Does that gal have a backlog of photos, or does she actually take a new one every day?
 
minsue said:
Tis a good promo, that's why I went there, but it really doesn't come across as a porn site to me on visiting. Just a fascinating collection of photos, some quite good, some quite silly. I likes it.

If you "likes it" and get off? Great :D
 
Liar said:
Question is: Does that gal have a backlog of photos, or does she actually take a new one every day?

Anawer is: if the girl is paid? She will do anything - everyday. :D
 
I quite like days 55 and 24, but I really wince at seeing an adult naked with her stuffed animal. Just feels horribly wrong.
 
Some of those are damned sexy, not because she's especially hot in herself (someone, please, get her a burger), but because the entire series shows us a little about who she is.

The Earl
 
BlackShanglan said:
I quite like days 55 and 24, but I really wince at seeing an adult naked with her stuffed animal. Just feels horribly wrong.

LOL true.
 
TheEarl said:
Some of those are damned sexy, not because she's especially hot in herself (someone, please, get her a burger), but because the entire series shows us a little about who she is.

The Earl

Ah those sites. I could tell you a lot about THOSE sites. lol PERVERT! ;)
 
Min - in truth you can shoot a woman more than 101 ways with lighting and framing, location and mise en scene - think film, not photo. :D Think Euro-film and not American.
 
minsue said:
Tis a good promo, that's why I went there, but it really doesn't come across as a porn site to me on visiting. Just a fascinating collection of photos, some quite good, some quite silly. I likes it.
...too.
 
I don't know how many ways, but I adored that scene in "the L Word" where the rare, divine photograph was revealed to Bette and she had the experience of the sublime described by Stendahl upon seeing a Caravaggio painting. Peggy Peabody recited the passage as a slightly intoxicated Bette dissolved into a rapture of joy upon seeing the photo.

Peggy: He went to Florence. He saw the Caravaggio.

Bette: And then he burst into tears, and then he fainted. The work of art was so beautiful and moving, he couldn't withstand the impact. The "Stendahl Syndrome".

Peggy: "My head thrown back, I let my gaze dwell on the ceiling. I underwent the profoundest experience of ecstacy I had ever encountered."


Why do I post it here? The photographer was a live-fast-die-young arist who had photographed the same woman over and over for ten years.
 
I liked day 1 #1 and day 90, but the contrast needs a little work. I LOVED day 24.
 
Uh... there's entire web-business that do it...

It's basically a porn sub-genre.... Amateur Girl Website.

Sincerely,
ElSol
 
Polyfoto

When Og and his siblings were young (RL young, not as Og, King of Bashan), High Street photographers used to take Polyfotos.

The young child would be sat in front of the camera and the parents would try to attract its attention, get the child to look left, right, up, down etc. The photographer would shoot 60 consecutive pictures that would eventually be printed as a large contact sheet.

The parents could choose any of the pictures to be enlarged and produced in a frame.

Most children under three would burst into tears from the repeated flashes before the 60 shots were completed. Often the pictures of the distressed child were the most poignant in later life.

Fond parents might have several Polyfotos taken at intervals through a child's development. I have three sets of my brother, two of my sister, and only one of me - the novelty wears off after the first child.

Polyfotos were often taken of girls throughout their lives. The photographer would have clothing and props so that the girl could appear as a fairy, as Wonderwoman, as a Victorian maiden etc. Polyfotos of brides were popular in the 1950s but since every shot had to be taken in the studio the preparation took a long time. The bride had to be presented as she would appear on her wedding day, dress, hair and cosmetics.

A local photographer still takes pictures of babies as 'fairies' with gauze wings, tiaras, wands etc in a ferny grotto. What the baby will make of the picture when a grungy teenager is anyone's guess. 'Hey Wayne! You looked like a fairy!' might elicit a physical retort.

Some artists, e.g. David Hockney, have spent their whole career interpreting images of themselves. I assume that the process could be endless.

Og
 
Back
Top