How many children will die under Trump?

[neci]

There were just somewhere between 7-10 plus a pregnant mother? Fake news back it up. Yemen. Trump's first raid. These are the numbers you need to worry about. Not tv ratings. We have an advanced military with all the options in the world. How can you justify the loss of life? What kind of government conducts a potientaly deadly raid upon children? This is 2017. Troops should have known the location of every body between the troops and their target. Disregard for innocent human life by the most powerful military in the world. A military with all the tools at their fingertips. If this is fake, spin it. Prove it. There is recent history under every president of the United States that follows suit. This death count is Trump's.

 

[neci]

I thought I was posting on the politics board.

 

[spacekowboy]

You were. Trust me.

 

[Lord Pmann]

naive or naïve
[nah-eev]
adjective
1.
having or showing unaffected simplicity of nature or absence of artificiality; unsophisticated; ingenuous.
2.
having or showing a lack of experience, judgment, or information; credulous:
She's so naive she believes everything she reads. He has a very naive attitude toward politics.

 

[irksomesauce]

There were just somewhere between 7-10 plus a pregnant mother? Fake news back it up. Yemen. Trump's first raid. These are the numbers you need to worry about. Not tv ratings. We have an advanced military with all the options in the world. How can you justify the loss of life? What kind of government conducts a potientaly deadly raid upon children? This is 2017. Troops should have known the location of every body between the troops and their target. Disregard for innocent human life by the most powerful military in the world. A military with all the tools at their fingertips. If this is fake, spin it. Prove it. There is recent history under every president of the United States that follows suit. This death count is Trump's.

What a pathetic piece of socialist shit hack...

A U.S. special operations raid against an al Qaeda compound in a remote part of Yemen was not delayed because President Obama failed to sign off on the operation before he left office this month, three Pentagon officials told the Washington Examiner.

The timing of the raid instead was determined by "operational" factors, and could not have been launched any earlier than Saturday, officials said. That runs counter to reports that Obama nixed the plan over weak intelligence.

The raid, conducted by the Navy's elite SEAL Team 6 along with commandos from the UAE, was intended to capture members of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Their mission included grabbing vital intelligence on the group, which is known for planning attacks against the West, including the 2014 Charlie Hebdo office massacre in Paris.

When Obama was briefed that the optimal time to launch the raid would be eight days after he was out of office, he deferred the decision to President Trump, almost as a "professional courtesy," said one official.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...ot-reject-plan-for-yemen-raid/article/2613648

An 8-year old American was killed in this past weekend's attack planned under Obama's watch; where was your pathetic partisan ass when Obama dusted off the girl's 16-year old America brother a couple of years ago? Did you post a word against him about that?

Of course you didn't - you're just a partisan piece of shit hack.

Under your championing, over 40 MILLION totally innocent human beings have been cold-bloodedly murdered since 1973...

You don't get to talk about anyone else killing children, babykiller.

Stick you pathetic socialist "fake" politics up your fat ass (right up there with your infamous Benghazi video crap) and take yourself to the fucking Playground where you both belong.

BTW, fuckwad: reports from the mission state almost all the women encountered were occupying fortified positions while firing on the SEALs; ie, they were trained and ready for exactly what happened...

If you really need to pimp your usual woe-is-us female victim hood crap, stick that "fake" shit up your fat ass before you go, too.

 

[Disgustipated]

What a pathetic piece of socialist shit hack...



An 8-year old American was killed in this past weekend's attack planned under Obama's watch; where was your pathetic partisan ass when Obama dusted off the girl's 16-year old America brother a couple of years ago? Did you post a word against him about that?

Of course you didn't - you're just a partisan piece of shit hack.

Under your championing, over 40 MILLION totally innocent human beings have been cold-bloodedly murdered since 1973...

You don't get to talk about anyone else killing children, babykiller.

Stick you pathetic socialist "fake" politics up your fat ass (right up there with your infamous Benghazi video crap) and take yourself to the fucking Playground where you both belong.

BTW, fuckwad: reports from the mission state almost all the women encountered were occupying fortified positions while firing on the SEALs; ie, they were trained and ready for exactly what happened...

If you really need to pimp your usual woe-is-us female victim hood crap, stick that "fake" shit up your fat ass before you go, too.

She can talk to me.

 

[Mello_SixtyNine]

I'll just leave this here.

PS: Obama's secret war in Yemen using drone strikes was 10 times larger than Bush's.

Pot...kettle...black.

 

[sr71plt]

There were just somewhere between 7-10 plus a pregnant mother? Fake news back it up. Yemen. Trump's first raid. These are the numbers you need to worry about. Not tv ratings. We have an advanced military with all the options in the world. How can you justify the loss of life? What kind of government conducts a potientaly deadly raid upon children? This is 2017. Troops should have known the location of every body between the troops and their target. Disregard for innocent human life by the most powerful military in the world. A military with all the tools at their fingertips. If this is fake, spin it. Prove it. There is recent history under every president of the United States that follows suit. This death count is Trump's.

He said quite clearly during the campaign that he would do this. He's pretty much doing and acting just like he demonstrated he would during the campaign. This can hardly come as a surprise.

 

[Conager]

On a positive note, now that Obama is safely out of office, Code Pink can come out of hibernation and resume criticizing war-mongering once again.

 

[renard_ruse]

Just stop. Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed by US administrations since the end of the Cold War, Democrat and Republican alike.

I'm not happy that Trump appears to be turning into just another neo-con/neo-lib on foreign policy, but to single him out as "worse" than any of the last 5 Presidents is just propaganda. The Democan-Republicrat Establishment duopoly all have to anwswer for US policy overseas.

 

[Disgustipated]

On a positive note, now that Obama is safely out of office, Code Pink can come out of hibernation and resume criticizing war-mongering once again.

FFS, Q-####. You type more and more like neverendingdipshit with your incessant 0bana assjuice whining.

 

[ishtat]

Interests first.

The only question to be asked - Is it in America's interests to allow the Shia (Iran) to take over in Yemen and threaten the Saudi oilfields? The clear answer is no.

In that context it may be regrettable, but a few dozen or even a few hundred dead civilians are of no consequence whatsoever.

The facts are unpleasant perhaps, but they remain the facts. America's interests do not change with the election of a new President.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

We're crying alligator tears over the loss of life with a combat mentality that uses hospitals and mosques as weapons dumps and a place to safely shelter their soldiers and then when out in the field have a proclivity to the use of human shields. Not a single of of these martyrs give a shit how many children they kill, even when they are strapping them up with suicide vests.

Holding ourselves to some suicidal higher standard impresses them not one wit, it only makes those on the hard Left feel better about themselves because it allows them to bask in the glow of elitist arrogance and a false sense of superiority over those whom they consider to lack nuance when it comes to use of force. Force is something you employ only when they are on US soil, in uniform, and attacking a sanctuary city...

Then, and only then are you allowed to be aggressive in defense of the liberals who live their.

 

[domroger]

How to win friends and influence people .

 

[BotanyBoy]

There were just somewhere between 7-10 plus a pregnant mother? Fake news back it up. Yemen. Trump's first raid. These are the numbers you need to worry about.

Why? Is the war in the middle east somehow now special??

We have an advanced military with all the options in the world.

So? Cool toys doesn't mean no collateral damage or fuck ups.

How can you justify the loss of life?

War.

What kind of government conducts a potientaly deadly raid upon children?

We do it every day, even to our own people.

You should watch videos of a SWAT raid some time.

This is 2017. Troops should have known the location of every body between the troops and their target.

Hua?? LOL what does 2017 have to do with the fact that no troops ever know that.

There are surprises behind every door....

This death count is Trump's.

Every single POTUS ever has a death count, if you're not ready to kill people and send your people to their deaths POTUS is not the job for you because that's what a POTUS does.

Every. Single. One.


I do wonder though, will Trump get a peace prize when he does finally get on O's level of bombing the shit out of brown folks???

 

[JohnnySavage]

1. We shouldn't be gallivanting all over the world poking our nose into everyone's business.

But,

2. If we do, the hounds should be unleashed.

When you are shooting bullets, people get killed and it's better them than us.

 

[BotanyBoy]

1. We shouldn't be gallivanting all over the world poking our nose into everyone's business.

But,

2. If we do, the hounds should be unleashed.

When you are shooting bullets, people get killed and it's better them than us.

https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder615/500x/56516615.jpg

LOL.......god that thing cracks me up every time.


Seriously though I'm 100% with your comment.

 

[water505]

Looks like the author of this thread will need to have his/her foot surgically removed from her mouth.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Looks like the author of this thread will need to have his/her foot surgically removed from her mouth.

Have you met Neci???

 

[water505]

Have you met Neci???

Why would I want to?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Why would I want to?

From the country song:

"... never back up, never back down..."





By met, I meant in a shorthand style, have you not observed her(/his?) posting style???

 

[water505]

From the country song:

"... never back up, never back down..."





By met, I meant in a shorthand style, have you not observed her(/his?) posting style???

Vacuous?

There are so many others just like him/her they've become indistinguishable.

 

[Magnetron]

All that hot air from Trump about how we aren't being covert enough with military strikes and the first one of his administration is telegraphed bigly.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

A raid that was approved by Obama and on hold for the next moonless night?

 

[Colonel Hogan]

1. We shouldn't be gallivanting all over the world poking our nose into everyone's business.

But,

2. If we do, the hounds should be unleashed.

When you are shooting bullets, people get killed and it's better them than us.

At some point I think we would be well served by a broader discussion of what constitutes "gallivanting," especially with regard to the proper response when others threaten your security with it.

Russia gallivants. China gallivants. Not so long ago Germany had a long and brutal history of gallivanting. And if the current militant ISIS agenda does not meet the technical definition of "gallivanting" then I don't understand the word.

On second thought, maybe we just need a better word to indicate reasonably and proactively defending our security interests with military and diplomatic measures.