I've been posting stories here for a year. Most of them are part of a single series. However, most of my stories have original titles, even if they fit within a larger series. For example, usually instead of titling a story While the Gods Slumber Pt. 17, I call it Night of the Forgotten. (Early on, I submitted each distinct story in parts, but I have gotten away from that.) The stories tend to average around 15-20K words.
I suppose as writers, we have at least two different approaches to creating our titles and descriptions. One would be to maximize retention of readers by maintaining the same title and adding a chapter or part number. In the description, that would mean naming the main character and describing whatever happens in that installment. The second approach would be to maximize views (hopefully attracting new readers) by giving the installment an original title, and not naming the character in the description - just giving a generic summary of the plot or whatever, without character names.
I see a distinct difference in views between the descriptions that name my characters and those that don't. For example, my latest story has a generic description, but the one before it in the series, published at the end of November, names both main characters. This newest one has more views in four days than the last installment got in eleven weeks. That single fact about the description - whether the characters are named - seems to be more determinative of my views than anything else (e.g., both descriptions mention sex or sensuality, both are straightforward plot summaries).
To be sure, views don't mean a whole lot. They don't mean anyone liked or even read that much of the story. I get that. But if your approach is to maximize your exposure, particularly if you are a newer Lit writer, that's something.
I've noticed that some writers don't seem to care about any of this and use the same title, Chapter/Part x+1, and even the same description for all of their installments.
So I'm curious. What is your approach to title and description? What lessons have you learned from writing them?
-Yib
I suppose as writers, we have at least two different approaches to creating our titles and descriptions. One would be to maximize retention of readers by maintaining the same title and adding a chapter or part number. In the description, that would mean naming the main character and describing whatever happens in that installment. The second approach would be to maximize views (hopefully attracting new readers) by giving the installment an original title, and not naming the character in the description - just giving a generic summary of the plot or whatever, without character names.
I see a distinct difference in views between the descriptions that name my characters and those that don't. For example, my latest story has a generic description, but the one before it in the series, published at the end of November, names both main characters. This newest one has more views in four days than the last installment got in eleven weeks. That single fact about the description - whether the characters are named - seems to be more determinative of my views than anything else (e.g., both descriptions mention sex or sensuality, both are straightforward plot summaries).
To be sure, views don't mean a whole lot. They don't mean anyone liked or even read that much of the story. I get that. But if your approach is to maximize your exposure, particularly if you are a newer Lit writer, that's something.
I've noticed that some writers don't seem to care about any of this and use the same title, Chapter/Part x+1, and even the same description for all of their installments.
So I'm curious. What is your approach to title and description? What lessons have you learned from writing them?
-Yib