james_1957
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Posts
- 778
Democratic National Committee chairman Tom Perez recently rose to address a rowdy convention of California Democrats, many of whom were not terribly thrilled to see him. The remarks were brief, but Perez did manage to rattle off a doozy of a quip - invoking a trope that has become commonplace among a certain subset of the liberal commentariat: "We have a president .... I don't know who it is, Putin or Trump," Perez declared. "They're in a bromance. This is really weird."
The term "bromance" is the kind of slang, semi-joking jargon that many Democrats who otherwise fancy themselves reputable have lapsed into using with bizarre frequency. Its constant overuse to describe the Trump/Russia collusion allegations suggests not just impoverishment of language, but impoverishment of thought; Perez and his cohort routinely struggle to articulate with any precision what it is they think is actually at issue with the Trump/Russia story. Collusion? Treason? Interference? Meddling? Some hazy combination of them all?
It's seldom clear what, at bottom, is even being alleged. The "scandal" has become more a repository of generalized anti-Trump anger than a clearly-defined set of charges that can be investigated and corroborated. If anything, it's more a shape-shifting meta-scandal with loose boundaries and ever-expanding parameters.
On the Russia story, Democrats have prepped their base for a final climactic revelation which may never come. Certainly Trump, in his impetuousness and lack of foresight, has bolstered that perception. So it's now a sure-thing that national Democrats will remain fixated on this issue for the foreseeable future - and while it may succeed in hamstringing Trump, the kind of paranoid ardor underlying the general "Russia narrative" can't lead to fruitful politics and a future that puts them back into power.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/24/democrats-fixated-on-trump-russia-scandal-commentary.html