Sparky Kronkite
Spam Eater Extraordinare'
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2000
- Posts
- 8,921
No sex for homely humans -
Theory: Considering that beauty is in the eye of the beholder - and in our time the beholder seems the be the Advertising Industry - and considering genetics and the luck of the draw - some use are blessed with better looks - others are not so lucky.
Lately I've been spotting what I believe to be a trend in what I'd loosely refer to as (because I'm no professional on this sort of stuff) a common tie between - LOOKS - SELF-IMAGE - PERSONAL CONFIDENCE - LIBIDO - SEXUAL OVERTNESS - and in the end - SEXUAL SATISFACTION.
The Swingers I see placing ads on the internet, putting their pics in the ads - for the most part they are pretty good looking folks - even the heavier, even the elderly voyagers - pretty good looking. There are some exceptions of course but for the most part, by and large, male and female, on a scale of 1 to 10 - most of them rate at least 5's or better.
No duh Sparky! Right? Of course, but… but… but -
I've just now begun looking the other direction, back down past the 5's. I'm concerned about the 2's, 3's and 4's and Lord knows, what about the 1's?
It's my theory that these folks have very little sex. The common tie, the chain that links good looks to a healthy sex life - it works in reverse too. Highly logical. No duh again Sparky.
But… but… but…
What can be done about it? Why can't ugly people have good sex too? Everyone should have good sex. There should be on premise Swing Clubs for ugly people. There should be WebSites for Swinging Uglies. No 5's to 10's allowed. Well generally that is - I guess if good looking folks "got off" on ugly folks that would be okay - but the idea here is to get the homely folks laid.
Ugly people need loving too. And in lea of love - they'll take some hot nasty sex.
Theory: Considering that beauty is in the eye of the beholder - and in our time the beholder seems the be the Advertising Industry - and considering genetics and the luck of the draw - some use are blessed with better looks - others are not so lucky.
Lately I've been spotting what I believe to be a trend in what I'd loosely refer to as (because I'm no professional on this sort of stuff) a common tie between - LOOKS - SELF-IMAGE - PERSONAL CONFIDENCE - LIBIDO - SEXUAL OVERTNESS - and in the end - SEXUAL SATISFACTION.
The Swingers I see placing ads on the internet, putting their pics in the ads - for the most part they are pretty good looking folks - even the heavier, even the elderly voyagers - pretty good looking. There are some exceptions of course but for the most part, by and large, male and female, on a scale of 1 to 10 - most of them rate at least 5's or better.
No duh Sparky! Right? Of course, but… but… but -
I've just now begun looking the other direction, back down past the 5's. I'm concerned about the 2's, 3's and 4's and Lord knows, what about the 1's?
It's my theory that these folks have very little sex. The common tie, the chain that links good looks to a healthy sex life - it works in reverse too. Highly logical. No duh again Sparky.
But… but… but…
What can be done about it? Why can't ugly people have good sex too? Everyone should have good sex. There should be on premise Swing Clubs for ugly people. There should be WebSites for Swinging Uglies. No 5's to 10's allowed. Well generally that is - I guess if good looking folks "got off" on ugly folks that would be okay - but the idea here is to get the homely folks laid.
Ugly people need loving too. And in lea of love - they'll take some hot nasty sex.