Hmm. Turns out Karl Marx was just as smelly and personally useless as his modern-day

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Hey, you want a good laugh? Figure out when I started to chortle… at the New York Times.


The Karl Marx depicted in Jonathan Sperber’s absorbing, meticulously researched biography will be unnervingly familiar to anyone who has had even the most fleeting acquaintance with radical politics. Here is a man never more passionate than when attacking his own side, saddled with perennial money problems and still reliant on his parents for cash, constantly plotting new, world-changing ventures yet having trouble with both deadlines and personal hygiene, living in rooms that some might call bohemian, others plain “slummy,” and who can be maddeningly inconsistent when not lapsing into elaborate flights of theory and unintelligible abstraction.

Still, it comes as a shock to realize that the ultimate leftist, the father of Communism itself, fits a recognizable pattern.

…Actually, no, it doesn’t come as a shock at all. Marxism is, as I have often noted, intellectualism for stupid people: it attracts third-rate True Believers and second-rate cynical opportunists, both of whom are eager to find an ‘intellectual’ movement that rewards memorization over reason, not to mention basic food production. That Karl Marx himself was just as, as Tim Blair put it, “stinky, broke, and mad” as his ideological great-great-grandchildren is hardly a revelation. The fact, though, that Marx apparently hated Jews just as much as some of the more vocal members of Occupy… no, wait, still not a revelation.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/b...-by-jonathan-sperber.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Here's the full review, so you can read it in context. This quote, especially, is germane:

"Sperber forces us to look anew at a man whose influence lives on. And he also offers a useful template for how we might approach other great figures, especially the great thinkers, of history — demystifying the words and deeds of those who too often are lazily deemed sacred. For all the books that have been written about America’s founding fathers, for example, we still await the historian who will do for them what Jonathan Sperber has done for Karl Marx."
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/b...-by-jonathan-sperber.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Here's the full review, so you can read it in context. This quote, especially, is germane:

"Sperber forces us to look anew at a man whose influence lives on. And he also offers a useful template for how we might approach other great figures, especially the great thinkers, of history — demystifying the words and deeds of those who too often are lazily deemed sacred. For all the books that have been written about America’s founding fathers, for example, we still await the historian who will do for them what Jonathan Sperber has done for Karl Marx."

good intelligent post..but as usual, selective quotes by the OP concentrate on the negatives...to be taken up by the mindless morons who agree with the OP's ideology.
 
The Media has always loved leftist murderous Dictators.

HITLER%20TIME%20MAGAZINE%20MAN%20OF%20THE%20YEAR.jpg

Adolf Hitler was time magazine's man of the year for 1938. Didn't they also romance Castro and Chi?
 
Hey, you want a good laugh? Figure out when I started to chortle… at the New York Times.


The Karl Marx depicted in Jonathan Sperber’s absorbing, meticulously researched biography will be unnervingly familiar to anyone who has had even the most fleeting acquaintance with radical politics. Here is a man never more passionate than when attacking his own side, saddled with perennial money problems and still reliant on his parents for cash, constantly plotting new, world-changing ventures yet having trouble with both deadlines and personal hygiene, living in rooms that some might call bohemian, others plain “slummy,” and who can be maddeningly inconsistent when not lapsing into elaborate flights of theory and unintelligible abstraction.

Still, it comes as a shock to realize that the ultimate leftist, the father of Communism itself, fits a recognizable pattern.

…Actually, no, it doesn’t come as a shock at all. Marxism is, as I have often noted, intellectualism for stupid people: it attracts third-rate True Believers and second-rate cynical opportunists, both of whom are eager to find an ‘intellectual’ movement that rewards memorization over reason, not to mention basic food production. That Karl Marx himself was just as, as Tim Blair put it, “stinky, broke, and mad” as his ideological great-great-grandchildren is hardly a revelation. The fact, though, that Marx apparently hated Jews just as much as some of the more vocal members of Occupy… no, wait, still not a revelation.
Did you look up his smell on Google Nose?
 
The Media has always loved leftist murderous Dictators.

HITLER%20TIME%20MAGAZINE%20MAN%20OF%20THE%20YEAR.jpg

Adolf Hitler was time magazine's man of the year for 1938. Didn't they also romance Castro and Chi?

You don't know what "leftist" means, do you?

Also, are you seriously fucking kidding me? You can't spell the name Che?
 
Back
Top