HIV-positive LA porn actor calls for condom use

AllardChardon

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Posts
4,797
HIV-positive LA porn actor calls for condom use
Associated Press

LOS ANGELES – An adult film actor who tested positive for HIV says he now wishes he had known more about the risks of contracting sexually transmitted diseases in the industry and is calling for mandatory condom use in porn films.

Derrick Burts, 24, identified himself to the Los Angeles Times as the performer who tested positive at the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation in Sherman Oaks in October. He had previously been known as Patient Zeta.

Burts, who performed in straight films as Cameron Reid and gay films as Derek Chambers, described the panicked call he got from clinic staff on Oct. 9 about the infection that sent fears through California's adult industry.

Clinic staff told him they wanted to perform a follow-up test and begin notifying performers he had worked with since his last negative test result Sept. 3. He was told those performers would be placed on a quarantine list and also would be tested.

When Burts returned to the clinic Oct. 23 to review the second test results, he said he was told that the clinic had traced his HIV infection to someone he had performed a scene with, someone they described as a "known positive." The clinic would not identity the performer because of patient confidentiality.

Burts said he believed he may have contracted the disease during a gay porn shoot in Florida.

Despite Burts' account of what he was told, clinic officials released a statement last month that said "Patient Zeta acquired the virus through private, personal activity."

"That's completely false," Burts told the Times. "There is no possible way. The only person I had sex with in my personal life was my girlfriend."

She tested negative, he said.

An e-mail to the Adult Industry Healthcare Foundation seeking comment late Tuesday was not immediately returned.

Burts said the clinic promised to put him in touch with a doctor affiliated with the clinic and promised to arrange for his follow-up care. But he said no one called him back and when he contacted the clinic, he received no response for two months.

In frustration, Burts said he went to an AIDS Healthcare Foundation center in Los Angeles on Nov. 24 but didn't identify himself as Patient Zeta.

Burts said he was pleased with the care he received there and contacted the head of the organization last week and identified himself as Patient Zeta. He said he wanted to speak out in favor of enforcing mandatory condom use in porn productions.

The Times reported the foundation had scheduled a news conference with Burt on Wednesday.

Burts grew up in Whittier and Hemet and graduated from Hemet High School and a hotel management school in Florida, according to the Times. He worked as a hotel manager and cruise ship magician before becoming a performer in the lucrative porn industry.

"Making $10,000 or $15,000 for porn isn't worth your life," he told the Times. "Performers need to be educated."


Sad, but true, we need to be cautious with STDs. The worst a person could get back in my youth was gnorreah and syphillis, both of which were treatable.
 
link to the story

Burts said AIM staff had warned him not to contact the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, whose officials have been among the clinic's chief critics.


The Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation seems to have been formed as an ass-cover for the industry. When it comes to taking care of the actual health of the industry employees... not so much, huh?
 
Last edited:
Some guys like to shoot first and ask questions later. It will always be that way.
 
This is really nothing new, except for this particular actor. Johh Holmes, probably the best known male porn star, died from AIDS. I'm sure there have been others. I had the impression that condoms were already required. :eek:
 
This is really nothing new, except for this particular actor. Johh Holmes, probably the best known male porn star, died from AIDS. I'm sure there have been others. I had the impression that condoms were already required. :eek:

Different eras, Box. Since the John Holmes era, supposedly testing and controls had been put into place to prevent this.

If he's lying and had unprotected sex privately with someone outside the control population, though, there isn't much that the control mechanisms could do about that at the point of infection.

They could, of course, give him give care after that--which maybe they didn't. This far it's only the first round of "he said" without any "they said" yet.
 
Different eras, Box. Since the John Holmes era, supposedly testing and controls had been put into place to prevent this.

If he's lying and had unprotected sex privately with someone outside the control population, though, there isn't much that the control mechanisms could do about that at the point of infection.

They could, of course, give him give care after that--which maybe they didn't. This far it's only the first round of "he said" without any "they said" yet.

As I said, it's not unique. John Holmes was probably the most famous, but there have been others. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...y-Aids-fears-as-16-cases-of-HIV-revealed.html
 
Also,the article isn't only about his HIV status, but about the fact that "patient Zeta's" identity has been made public.

It's about the industry's policies, and about the health agency's actions-- or alleged inactions.
 
Also,the article isn't only about his HIV status, but about the fact that "patient Zeta's" identity has been made public.

It's about the industry's policies, and about the health agency's actions-- or alleged inactions.

One wonders what patient tag the "person" they say he got it from (also in porn films) is--and what the system is doing for/about her/him. He was told that person was a known positive--so why was that person permitted to continue filming?

The article begs almost as many questions as it answers.
 
One wonders what patient tag the "person" they say he got it from (also in porn films) is--and what the system is doing for/about her/him. He was told that person was a known positive--so why was that person permitted to continue filming?

The article begs almost as many questions as it answers.

And if the person became a known positive after Burts had sex with them, well, still doesn't say much about their system...or rather, it does.
 
One wonders what patient tag the "person" they say he got it from (also in porn films) is--and what the system is doing for/about her/him. He was told that person was a known positive--so why was that person permitted to continue filming?

The article begs almost as many questions as it answers.
it does indeed.

The foundation seems to be pretty well embattled slammed between moralists, politicians, economic needs and actual medical concerns.
http://www.aim-med.org/
 
it does indeed.

The foundation seems to be pretty well embattled slammed between moralists, politicians, economic needs and actual medical concerns.
http://www.aim-med.org/

Thank god we didn't have any of this in my day--back when I was playing volleyball in the background in Annette Funicello beach movies. That was before I knew anything about sex at all--still too busy admiring myself in the mirror. I was offered porn then, but was embarrassed that I'd have no idea what to do.

I haven't kept track of this commission. I guess my understanding was that the first hint they had of anyone on the set who tested positive--and that they were tested frequently--and that person was immediately bounced out of the business altogether.
 
This is one of those stories that might bounce back and forth between the two factions and I will keep an eye out for future related articles. Either way, I do feel compassion for porn actor/Patient Zeta's extreme pain over this. May he enlighten us all.
 
Since they discovered AIDS back in the 1980s, straight adult film performers have to be tested for HIV. A performer has to get tested, or the performer doesn't work. If a performer doesn't pass the test then the performer doesn't work. A performer has to have the performer's blood work cleared and documented by a recognized medical facility. AIM is generally regarded as the best. AIM has a website and a performer can find a nearby facility.

Unfortunately, gay film performers aren't tested to the same requirements and some aren't even tested, as is pointed out in the article.

A straight performer has to have a current PHOTO drivers license, a Social Security card and a blood work card. (The photo ID requirement came about after Traci Lords presented a real drivers license, but not HER driver's license. People went to jail and literally millions were lost because of the use of underage Traci Lords.) The three pieces of ID MUST be presented at a film shoot, before a performer is allowed to take part in the film shoot. (Of course, of the performer doesn't take part in the film shoot, then the performer isn't a performer. However, the adult film industry assigns titles on the basis of intent, not actual. "There's no damn reason for it, it's just our policy.")

The use of condoms is really not practical in straight adult films. Almost all of the time, a male performer comes outside the girl's pussy/ass/mouth. The actual sighting of the cum is apparently to traditional to change. The pulling out of a blowjob and coming in a girl's face is called, "the money shot."

The problem of STDs is a continuing one. In straight adult films, the discovery of a performer with an STD probably means that the performer's career is over. There was a working girl who was also selling it on the street in Canada and she caught an STD, not HIV. No one would work with her after that. There was a male star who went to Brazil and caught an STD. No one would work with him after that.

The adult film industry is a surprisingly small and interconnected industry. People in the industry know each other and the idea that someone could just fib about casual sexual contacts is remote. (Witness the quick identification of the known HIV positive.)

Fortunately, HIV is treatable, if not curable.
 
Thank god we didn't have any of this in my day--back when I was playing volleyball in the background in Annette Funicello beach movies. That was before I knew anything about sex at all--still too busy admiring myself in the mirror. I was offered porn then, but was embarrassed that I'd have no idea what to do.

I haven't kept track of this commission. I guess my understanding was that the first hint they had of anyone on the set who tested positive--and that they were tested frequently--and that person was immediately bounced out of the business altogether.
I'm thinking it's like the talking dog-- the miracle isn't that it talks especially well, but that it talks at all...


I notice one of the PSA's on the AIM site-- "Don't pop your cherry on film!"
 
Hopefully, after this incident, the gay porn industry will practice better measures to ensure their performers are safe from harm and diseases.
 
Hopefully, after this incident, the gay porn industry will practice better measures to ensure their performers are safe from harm and diseases.

The fallacy here is in any assumption that what a porn actor will do on set is any different from what he/she will do in private--with no controls--and then bring to the set.

The chain. This porn actor probably didn't get this through osmosis. Where did the on who give it to him get it?

Seems the only remedy is to test everyone before filming and keep them locked up and separate then until filming. Not very practical if the test results can't come back immediately.
 
There must be a few gay porn stars who do practice safe sex and do not need to be locked up until the shoot starts. The major problem here is honestly, among the workers, it would seem.
 
Back
Top