Hillary "Unelectable" Clinton

[BoyNextDoor]

The Democrats are out of their fuckng mind if they they give her the nomination

 

[JackLuis]

Louis Farrakhan on Hillary Clinton

Hillary does well with Blacks?

 

[BotanyBoy]

LOL

I've been listening/watching news, talking heads, internet shit etc. all evening and from what it sounds like, things are looking worse for (R)odham as (R)epublicans consolidate around Trump.

Hold on folks this one is gonna be a wile ride!

 

[JackLuis]

My sense is that the LSM is shading the horse race to build the enthusiasm of the Rubes, to enhance the ad revenue later. Princess with dirty secrets, vs Evil Troll and who bakes the Witch?

However we may also be seeing the deflating of Hillary's acceptance and the terrifying acceptance of voters of Trump as an actual President!

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Its the peasants with pitchforks storming the castle where Hillary and the GOP white knights stay.

From day one I said Trump follows Adolf Hitler's election strategy. Hitler was elected, by golly.

When you excavate the history of Germany from 1919 to 1933 its a mirror of America from 2009 till now. Hitlers theme was MAKE GERMANY GREAT AGAIN.

When you examine Hitlers problem with Jews, the problem is simple. After the Russian revolution Jews fled Russia and East Europe for Germany. The Jews weren't peasants. All were middle-class professionals and self employed who prospered in Germany. But their kids were spoiled college brats who flocked to the socialists and communists. And Hitler had a psychotic hatred for ideological socialists. Recall that fascism is pragmatic socialism, socialism with a functioning brain. And the Jews got in front of his gaydar. Every Jew I know of is gay or wants to be.

 

[Busybody]

BrainDead Joe will run

 

[Sean Renaud]

LOL

I've been listening/watching news, talking heads, internet shit etc. all evening and from what it sounds like, things are looking worse for (R)odham as (R)epublicans consolidate around Trump.

Hold on folks this one is gonna be a wile ride!

I think it's mostly that Bernie is still in there. I mean last time around they kept telling us it was gonna be close and. . .yeah that didn't happen. But you may be right this time.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I think it's mostly that Bernie is still in there. I mean last time around they kept telling us it was gonna be close and. . .yeah that didn't happen. But you may be right this time.

Oh Bernies still being there is definitely having an effect.

Apparently a number of polls show a good chunk of Sandaz supporters going to Trump instead of lemming defaulting to Clinton.

I'm not saying any 1 thing is going to happen....if the primaries have shown us anything it's that all the normal 'rules', indicators and poll info this election year are off and mean jack shit.

I think anything could happen at this point.

One thing that is clear however is that (D)'s outright dismissal of Trump as a possibility, and absolute certainty that the DNC queen of Wall Street already owns the WH is getting harder and harder to keep up for all but the deepest of brainwashed lemmings.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I'm not sure lemming to Clinton is the proper term for (next logical choice) any more than the majority of Republicans going to Trump rather than Hillary is lemming behavior. I mean sure logically we should snag both Kasich Supporters but that's as far as that goes.

Yeah this year has been zany as shit. I doth not want to put up with this madness again.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Hillary is going to lose California by 1% and then the shit is really going to fly

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'm not sure lemming to Clinton is the proper term for (next logical choice) any more than the majority of Republicans going to Trump rather than Hillary is lemming behavior. I mean sure logically we should snag both Kasich Supporters but that's as far as that goes.

Yeah this year has been zany as shit. I doth not want to put up with this madness again.

It's the next logical choice if you're a diehard DNC/Billy C fan, that's about it.

Otherwise she has little to no appeal....

It's so bad she's got a gnarly fight going on vs a socialist and a reality TV star that's going so poorly she can't even get up and debate them. They both make her look like the quintessential scumbag pol that shit is and she can't afford another 2 hour beat down like that.

Hillary is going to lose California by 1% and then the shit is really going to fly

Nah....she'd get 90% of the delegates and it would be sealed up.

If she looses California by 44% and gets 1/2 the delegates like I suspect she would then shit might get ugly.

But I doubt sanders will crush it, California isn't really all that progressive and they hate poor people more than any state I've ever seen except maybe NY. The elites of CA fucking love her, the DNC and I think most would rather see Romney in office over Sanders. Shit.... Bush could probably beat Sanders in California.

 

[Sean Renaud]

The reality star crushed it somehow. But you're not wrong about losing to a socialist. But you're with me in believing that is the future. So that's not really an indictment on her.

She and Sanders have 85% similarity on voting records. If she's not a more logical choice than Cruz would have been it's because logic and emotion are not the same thing and people are emotional about Hillary. With good reason mind you but lets not pretend that if you have any of the social stances of a liberal that anybody on the right makes ANY sense at all as a choice.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The reality star crushed it somehow.

The GOP thrashed the hands that fed a little too hard for a little too long.

And the DNC is RIGHT on their heels.

But you're not wrong about losing to a socialist. But you're with me in believing that is the future. So that's not really an indictment on her.

Not an indictment on her. But definitely of her brand of politics, that cold war era corporate whore chicken hawk bullshitting just isn't flying in the internet era like it did back in the last half of the 20th century. And I think this whole election is it's last flailing grasp for power.

Economically speaking I'm not with you that it's the future, I think it's a potential future. IMHO at SOME point we are going to make a far harder L or R turn out of this plutocracy. Sandaz v Trump just might be that final push to one side or the other. Socially I think we're definitely going liberal. But that doesn't mean we have to economically.

Honestly IDGAF which way we go, there are examples of both systems working and both crashing in total disaster. But we need to make up our fucking minds because 'pleasant lies to the public so I can get paid to let the rich rat fuck the country' politics just aren't going to be tolerated much if any longer.

She and Sanders have 85% similarity on voting records.

That 15% makes them WORLDS apart though.

If she's not a more logical choice than Cruz would have been it's because logic and emotion are not the same thing and people are emotional about Hillary. With good reason mind you but lets not pretend that if you have any of the social stances of a liberal that anybody on the right makes ANY sense at all as a choice.

Is Clinton a better choice?

She's just more lies until sworn in office.....then she's going to let too big to fail rat fuck the country and allow them to use any number of bullshit alphabet agencies like their personal goon squads to keep the lower 90% of the country from getting in on any of their action. Is supporting that REALLY a better choice than putting pitch forks and torches to ass???

I honestly think the ONLY people ardently for Hillary are (D) partisan lemming idiots and people who know their paychecks depend on things not actually changing in any meaningful way.

Not because she's an actual better choice or will do anything actually liberal in nature or support/help the working class American at all. Anyone who actually believes the shit that comes out of her mouth is foolish at best.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Half that 15% is gun stuff that I honestly give zero shits about.

But yeah we'll see how this all shakes down in a few months. I doubt it will be particularly close. I'm not predicting Bush vs Gore or Bush v Kerry. I mean sure it's gonna come down to Ohio and Florida and maybe one other place but I don't see those two splitting unless something interesting unfolds.

 

[patient1]

It's the next logical choice if you're a diehard DNC/Billy C fan, that's about it.

Otherwise she has little to no appeal....

It's so bad she's got a gnarly fight going on vs a socialist and a reality TV star that's going so poorly she can't even get up and debate them. They both make her look like the quintessential scumbag pol that shit is and she can't afford another 2 hour beat down like that.

Au contraire, mon frere - sometimes she looks like the quintessential parsing, greedy lawyer that she is.... Okay maybe that's not on the contrary so much as the flip side of the wooden nickel.

But I'd watch her get a 2 hour beat down on pay per view.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

If you wanna predict the election outcome determine who lost money since 2008. This year those people are the middle class and white wage slaves. I define middle class as the self employed. Both got hosed since 2008. Seventeen GOP candidates for President had no idea! and Trump got the nomination.

For now Hillary and the media are whooping around the campfire because Trump dated women when he was younger. In the America they want all will be gay...or else. America will drop Hillary like a hot rock.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

The GOP thrashed the hands that fed a little too hard for a little too long.

And the DNC is RIGHT on their heels.



Not an indictment on her. But definitely of her brand of politics, that cold war era corporate whore chicken hawk bullshitting just isn't flying in the internet era like it did back in the last half of the 20th century. And I think this whole election is it's last flailing grasp for power.

Economically speaking I'm not with you that it's the future, I think it's a potential future. IMHO at SOME point we are going to make a far harder L or R turn out of this plutocracy. Sandaz v Trump just might be that final push to one side or the other. Socially I think we're definitely going liberal. But that doesn't mean we have to economically.

Honestly IDGAF which way we go, there are examples of both systems working and both crashing in total disaster. But we need to make up our fucking minds because 'pleasant lies to the public so I can get paid to let the rich rat fuck the country' politics just aren't going to be tolerated much if any longer.



That 15% makes them WORLDS apart though.




Is Clinton a better choice?

She's just more lies until sworn in office.....then she's going to let too big to fail rat fuck the country and allow them to use any number of bullshit alphabet agencies like their personal goon squads to keep the lower 90% of the country from getting in on any of their action. Is supporting that REALLY a better choice than putting pitch forks and torches to ass???

I honestly think the ONLY people ardently for Hillary are (D) partisan lemming idiots and people who know their paychecks depend on things not actually changing in any meaningful way.

Not because she's an actual better choice or will do anything actually liberal in nature or support/help the working class American at all. Anyone who actually believes the shit that comes out of her mouth is foolish at best.

The world knows Hillary will be what she's always been: 24/7 controversy and outrage and bullshit, and the airport lines will grow longer.