Hey Kitty Mama, If You're Reading .....

jaF0

Moderator
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Posts
39,168
You moved all the Polly threads over to the Polly board which many of us had been asking for and appreciate.


Maybe consider moving the various picture threads to F&S or the PG?
 
There's like 3 people who start those threads. Just put them on ignore if they are that tiresome. This place is a porn board.
 
Well geesh. Laurel can’t win. What do you want the GB to be?

a graveyard. the sad truth is that the reason the political threads and pic threads took over is because the chatters here all fucked off and left.

and those that remain just hangout in the blurt thread.
 
a graveyard. the sad truth is that the reason the political threads and pic threads took over is because the chatters here all fucked off and left.

and those that remain just hangout in the blurt thread.

I'm hoping for a GB resurrection.
 
What a great idea!

That way, at least two, possibly three full days worth of posts will fit comfortably on page one. So much better than letting people "tailor the forum to your tastes by using the ignore function."

Wait. . .

I've a better idea. Call it "The Blurt Bitch Forum," disable the ability to start new threads, and have only two threads both preferably hosted by the relatively congenial interloper, Harry.

  • The Passive Aggressive Blurt Thread
  • Harry and Butters Post To Each Other From Across The Shack
 
Active censorship. . .

. . .of a site proudly self-labled as "Free Seech - No Spam" with no apparent ironic intention. . .

attachment.php


Outstanding!
 
You meant to post this in 'The Passive Aggressive Blurt Thread', blurt bitch.

I would, if there was anything even remotely "passive aggressive" about identifying them by name and clearly pointing out their actions.

Did you mean I should specifically state that such behavior is insipid? I thought that pretty clearly implied by the sarcasm.
 
I would, if there was anything even remotely "passive aggressive" about identifying them by name and clearly pointing out their actions.

Did you mean I should specifically state that such behavior is insipid? I thought that pretty clearly implied by the sarcasm.

While hoping they happen across it in a thread neither of them have posted in?

My, aren't you a brave one.
 
While hoping they happen across it in a thread neither of them have posted in?

My, aren't you a brave one.
"Brave?"

Why? What will happen if Butters, who pretends she has me on ignore reads it? :confused:

I spelled B U T T E R S name right; so no worries, she will pick it up on her daily vanity search. It wasn't TO them it was ABOUT them in a totally clear, not at all passive aggressive, way. The point of the post was that their insipid posts are all that is left on the GB, not that their insipid posts should deleted or moved.

It wasn't even particularly important to the larger point implied that there is not much there left on the General Board and the OP is proposing we have less.

You aren't very bright either, are you?
 
Last edited:
Too fucking funny.

I should have said, "hourly vanity search."

Notice her fantasizing that anyone is pining for her attention?
 
Last edited:
he's a desperate yappy seeking attention he's not gonna get from me. but it won't prevent him trying!

Many autistic people don't handle change well. The little fella's coping mechanisms are severely taxed. One suspects he now randomly twitches as much as BotanyBoy does.
 
Back
Top