Hey, I'm new here

[lovecraft68]

Thank you, I will. (And there you go making assumptions you can't possibly know again. Sort of a disease with you, which, when matched with your obsessions and your bull-dog tenacity, is tearing this forum apart.)

Yes, just me. You always know exactly when to walk away don't you? Mrs. Last word you are.

Ironically on the note of alts "Lovecraft68" is technically an alt, its not my first ID here, but my "writing" handle.

But I haven't used the other name in so long I forgot the password and the e-mail address I had it under is gone as well.

Oh, well just me now.

 

[sr71plt]

Mrs. Last word you are.

Have you actually kept track of which of us takes the last word (which you just tried to do, incidentally)? I do. And I laugh, because it's almost always you. You are the one who can't resist that last little dig. I invite a bit of research into that by anyone who is interested in the truth of this. It would be all that hard to do. It always makes me laugh when you bring up this "this will shut him up" game.

I'll bet you even post a last word after this post.

It's certainly obvious who has the obsession with who, who is competitive, and who has to be better. Again, a little research would be revealing.

I've never commented on the quality of your stories. I haven't read any of them. Not avoiding them. I don't read much of anyone's (I don't read Penn Lady's or Ogg's, for instance, so there's nothing to read into my not reading yours).

For all I know you are a better writer than I am. I do know, however, that we aren't writing to any of the same markets, so there's no need for comparisons or competition--and I haven't made any.

But you have several times posted to this forum that my stories are crap--you even research and cite statistics on my published erotica, and I've never mentioned yours.

What does this tell you about who is competitive, who wants to assert that they are better, who is obsessed with who?

 

[lovecraft68]

Mrs. Last Word above

 

[TxRad]

This could be a new Laurel and Hardy routine or maybe even Abbot and Costello.

Whose on first.

 

[Dyslexicea]

Thank you, I will. (And there you go making assumptions you can't possibly know again. Sort of a disease with you, which, when matched with your obsessions and your bull-dog tenacity, is tearing this forum apart.)

Speaking of assumptions!

 

[lovecraft68]

This could be a new Laurel and Hardy routine or maybe even Abbot and Costello.

Whose on first.

What about Martin and Lewis?

I was trying to think if there is a modern equivalent of that type of duo these days, but I can't think of one.

There are a few actors that have done some movies together, but most of them are lame and not funny.

Too bad the "Cory's" Haim and Feldman from the late 80's early 90's didn't keep doing movies together, you never know.

 

[sr71plt]

Speaking of assumptions!

It's hardly an assumption. Each time the two of us get into it, others post that it's disruptive of the forum, and it almost always stems from an attack he's posted on me. A little bit of research would have saved you that nasty comment (not that you seem to want to be saved from making nasty comments. )

 

[NekoParks]

What about Martin and Lewis?

I was trying to think if there is a modern equivalent of that type of duo these days, but I can't think of one.

There are a few actors that have done some movies together, but most of them are lame and not funny.

Too bad the "Cory's" Haim and Feldman from the late 80's early 90's didn't keep doing movies together, you never know.

What about Jay and Silent Bob? Nah! I always liked Hope and Crosby myself. Some of their routines were hysterical. Where is Groucho Marx when we need him?

 

[TxRad]

What about Jay and Silent Bob? Nah! I always liked Hope and Crosby myself. Some of their routines were hysterical. Where is Groucho Marx when we need him?

That's what Harpo kept asking. Honk, Honk