Hey, fucking retards, Rahm's gonna start saying you're "Intellectually Disabled..."

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

U_D....




Do you know what Liberalism meant when Hitler was striving for control of Germany's Social State established in the 1880's?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I couldn't have said it more clearly than I already did. If you choose not to acknowledge that, then I really couldn't care less.

"Become immortal" ... LOL, okay LT, make me immortal you fucktard.

Then just say it. Quote yourself. Eat some crow, be a man, stop hiding...

TYPICAL DEMOCRAT!

 

[unregistered]

 

[Saint Peter]

... LOL, okay LT, make me immortal you fucktard.

The new Boy Blunder!

 

[zipman]

The new Boy Blunder!

Apparently, the Olmpics have inspired him to new heights.

Now he thinks you can apologize "to someones face" on the Internet.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Apparently, the Olmpics have inspired him to new heights.

Now he thinks you can apologize "to someones face" on the Internet.

No, I think you're a coward trying to bury an apology owed.

And you're too stupid to understand a metaphor.

Just as you're ignorant when it comes to math...

Here I am zip. Say you're sorry. Be the man you claim to be or prove you're the man I think you are...

 

[zipman]

No, I think you're a coward trying to bury an apology owed.

And you're too stupid to understand a metaphor.

Just as you're ignorant when it comes to math...

Here I am zip. Say you're sorry. Be the man you claim to be or prove you're the man I think you are...

LMAO! How did I try and bury it? By posting it in the same thread? I even quoted your own post when I did it and that isn't enough for you?

Say I'm sorry? Are you kidding me?

Go fuck yourself asswipe, you don't deserve any kind of apology.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

LMAO! How did I try and bury it? By posting it in the same thread? I even quoted your own post when I did it and that isn't enough for you?

Say I'm sorry? Are you kidding me?

Go fuck yourself asswipe, you don't deserve any kind of apology.

I knew that would be your answer. That's who you are.

ME, if I had wronged someone that badly, I'd bend over backwards to make it up to them. I'm even playing well with Petey and Byron after the nastiness of Iraq.

You're just nastiness incarnate...

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Hell, all you had to do was BUMP the post and you can't even bring yourself to do that.

THAT's RETARDED!!!


__________________
It's okay because I'm volunteering with the Special Olympics Bowling Team...
A_J, the Stupid

 

[zipman]

I knew that would be your answer. That's who you are.

ME, if I had wronged someone that badly, I'd bend over backwards to make it up to them. I'm even playing well with Petey and Byron after the nastiness of Iraq.

You're just nastiness incarnate...

If you think that my comment "wronged you that badly" then you truly have become LT.

Have fun with that.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Oh, to be sure, I will...





Just read the sigline. I'm HAVING fun.

 

[zipman]

Oh, to be sure, I will...

Just read the sigline. I'm HAVING fun.

Yes, you're a regular internet warrior just like your buddy LT.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

I'm not going to waste my time undoing your pedagogic childhood brain raping. All you need to know about him was he edited Italy's largest Socialist magazine Avanti. He was a totalitarian...a creature of the left.

LONG before he was ever in a position of power. To insist otherwise is just dishonest, but then we're talking about YOU here.

 

[hogjack]

pedagogic childhood brain raping.

Another rejected Jeopardy! category.

 

[naughtycakes]

All you're doing is a childish ad Hominem, no different than Le Trouver with his lazy fare capitalism and Hayek.

I don't "worship" Rand. That's your characterization. Then you tear down Rand personally and say, see, Rand is discredited. Then you say that means I am discredited because I talk about her writings and philosophies. In this manner, you don't have to talk about any philosophy or even address the topic.

You're a fucking retard in that sense if you think I can't discern the tactic.

Hahahaha, nice try.

Pointing out that your pseudo-intellectual beacon is an outspoken advocate for abortion is a personal attack? Really? How so?

And you're still evading the question: how can you justify your documented fervor and admiration for an abortion crusader?

Next thing he'll tell you is Mussolini was a right winger.

Oh the lulz

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Hey, naughtycakes...

You're a fucking retard.

(It's okay because I'm volunteering with the Special Olympics Bowling Team... )

"Don't get stuck on stupid!"
Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Yes, you're a regular internet warrior just like your buddy LT.

This is the same damn game you played not too long ago, only what I said simply went over your head and you don't have me calling you stupid.



Just like the joke about ordinality and cardinality went over your head, because like LT and most of the rest of the Democrats here, you read to attack, not discuss...

You saw, it ran it through your spellcheck and got giddy with "AHA!"

"I got dat wascawwy wabbit now!"

 

[Cheyenne]

reclassifying Asperger's syndrome as an autism spectrum disorder...

I thiought Aspergers was already considered an autism spectrum disorder... If not, what is it considered now?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I thiought Aspergers was already considered an autism spectrum disorder... If not, what is it considered now?

I have no idea. It was one of those little "facts of the day" at Refdesk.com...


Something I decided to play with a bit when juxtaposed with an "issue" of the day.

(I slay me!)

[zippy, do I need to type it slower?]

 

[Cheyenne]

I couldn't have said it more clearly than I already did. If you choose not to acknowledge that, then I really couldn't care less.

"Become immortal" ... LOL, okay LT, make me immortal you fucktard.

I don't understand why AJ can't see it, either. You were very clear.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I don't understand why AJ can't see it, either. You were very clear.

He blamed it on his dictionary and wasn't the least bit apologetic about it, it's one of those "I don't care if the document was forged, the story is still true" moments that Democrats are so fond of...





So, in reply to the last time he hounded me, he gets the...

 

[naughtycakes]

Me thinks the ladyboy doth protest ad Hominem too much

It's funny how you always hide behind terms your little pea brain can barely grasp when you don't want to or can't answer a valid question.

Oh the inconsistencies!

All you're doing is a childish ad Hominem, no different than Le Trouver with his lazy fare capitalism and Hayek.

I don't "worship" Rand. That's your characterization. Then you tear down Rand personally and say, see, Rand is discredited. Then you say that means I am discredited because I talk about her writings and philosophies. In this manner, you don't have to talk about any philosophy or even address the topic.

You're a fucking retard in that sense if you think I can't discern the tactic.

Hahahaha, nice try.

Pointing out that your pseudo-intellectual beacon is an outspoken advocate for abortion is a personal attack? Really? How so?

And you're still evading the question: how can you justify your documented fervor and admiration for an abortion crusader?

Hey, naughtycakes...

You're a fucking retard.

(It's okay because I'm volunteering with the Special Olympics Bowling Team... )

"Don't get stuck on stupid!"
Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

She's not "my beacon."


Never has been. That would be von Humboldt, Smith, Mises, Hayek...,



You're the shallow one of documentary intelligence.
__________________
"Little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice: all the rest being brought about by the natural course of things."
Adam Smith

 

[naughtycakes]

She's not "my beacon."


Never has been. That would be von Humboldt, Smith, Mises, Hayek...,


You're the shallow one of documentary intelligence.
__________________
"Little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice: all the rest being brought about by the natural course of things."
Adam Smith

So will you ever stop with the personal attacks and just answer the question? Or should I take a page from your ad-Hominemissious book and simply respond I know you are but what am I?

I'll repeat the question for you, how can you justify touting the philosophies of an abortion crusader?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Because I am able to separate the philosophy from the person.

There isn't a single writer/leader out there that doesn't have some contradiction.

It's ad Hominem by circumstance (class) and has little, or nothing, to do with the underlying philosophy of the positions I take, because I don't let Rand do my thinking, she's just an aid as are the aforementioned writers who shape my outlook.