Here's a responsible gun owner.

[BotanyBoy]

It's not difficult. In USA, merely enforce the 2nd Amendment. You want to possess firearms in public? Join a well-regulated militia. Otherwise, be severely punished.

LOL

So you can't read......again.

 

[richard_daily]

Had he not been armed with a firearm, his sanity would not be a great concern. Sure, he could have slain with a knife or hatchet or explosive, although those take a bit more effort than pulling a trigger. But he would not have shot anyone.

This seems to be a hard concept: Those without firearms can't shoot people. Duh. More firearms packed ==> more people get shot. Duh. To reduce shooting deaths, reduce firearms. Duh. [tap on forehead] Anybody home?

It's not difficult. In USA, merely enforce the 2nd Amendment. You want to possess firearms in public? Join a well-regulated militia. Otherwise, be severely punished. Carry an unauthorized firearm? Public flogging and exile. Packing on a school campus? Hand amputation.

Will courts ever enforce the 2nd? Ha. Amerikkka is addicted to gunpowder (that's a metaphor). Firearms production is uncontrollable, even without 3D printers. Public possession is theoretically controllable, but really impossible.

Expect up to 200 school shootings in USA in 2018. What a country!

The 2nd amendment isn't about a "well-regulated militia".

Why should you "control" the public possession of firearms?

So you would like to take away firearms from healthy people, "just in case" someone is having un-resolved mental health issues.

What that sounds like to me, is that you would like to punish society for the few who need it not having access to mental health care that they need and deserve.

That doesn't fix the problem.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Why should you "control" the public possession of firearms?

Same reason leftist always want control and power....the greater good!! Equality!

What that sounds like to me, is that you would like to punish society for the few

As a lefty I thought you would approve of that.

 

[BobaFetaCheese]

I have guns, I don't kill people. Much.
Some small animals and birds, occasionally a large animal. Kill the fuck out of clay pigeons and targets. It's fun and my dick isn't even small so go figure.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

If guns kill people ...

Then cars drive drunk, pencils misspell words and spoons make people fat.

People who want a gun will get them whether there are laws against it or not. People are the problem, not the guns.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I've never owned or fired a gun (except a pellet gun) in my life. I don't think gun control will solve anything and our 2nd Amendment says not to fuck with our access to them. At all. We must live by the rules we have set forth for ourselves. It sucks that innocent people die but until this amendment is changed we need to find another way to deal with it.

I suspect if someone close to me was a victim of a shooting, I would rage against the person that did it and not the tool they used.

 

[Hypoxia]

The 2nd amendment isn't about a "well-regulated militia".

No, of course not. It starts with language it doesn't mean. Right. [/me taps /you forehead] Anybody home?

 

[milehighcityman]

I grew up in a small town, agricultural community. We all grew up with firearms. No one ever got shot. To the best of my knowledge there has never been a school shooting in that county. Does that mean it wont happen there? No. It could happen there just as easily as anywhere else. But the question we need to be addressing is why are kids increasingly turning to violence? Should kids have access to firearms? No. All gun owners should ensure their firearms are properly secured. But that is a red herring in terms of addressing the school shooting issue. This is a cultural mental health issue.

 

[BotanyBoy]

No, of course not. It starts with language it doesn't mean. Right. [/me taps /you forehead] Anybody home?

^^ Never has been able to point out where it speaks of a militia being a prerequisite though.

 

[Luk]

Woman dead, man wounded in homicide, attempted suicide at the Oaks mall in Thousand Oaks

Too close to home. Fucker opened fire inside of a packed mall on a Saturday.

 

[richard_daily]

No, of course not. It starts with language it doesn't mean. Right. [/me taps /you forehead] Anybody home?

That's the justification for the next line, which is:

"the right of the people to keep and bear arms"

The same terminology is used in the first, and fourth amendments, and the same phrasing.

I know this is hard for you, so let's let a law professor explain it for you, slowly:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEqGBOt32NM

 

[Luk]

Shooting reported at Great Mills High School in Maryland, school district says

 

[richard_daily]

And in the same time, how many kids have died via other means, that you folks have ignored?

Hint: A lot more than happened with guns.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...er-from-his-sister-so-he-shot-her-police-say/

 

[BotanyBoy]

And in the same time, how many kids have died via other means, that you folks have ignored?

Hint: A lot more than happened with guns.

Yea but they don't want to ban those things.

They do want to ban guns.

Because there are idiots and nut jobs in some places, all must be punished.

 

[phrodeau]

And in the same time, how many kids have died via other means, that you folks have ignored?

Hint: A lot more than happened with guns.

What do you think is an acceptable rate of kids being killed?

 

[BotanyBoy]

What do you think is an acceptable rate of kids being killed?

The same rate of offended (D)'s and AntiFa's who are debilitated by freedom of speech that other people enjoy while calling them a bunch of fuck heads who need to get a job and get out of their moms basement.

 

[chillywilly2]

They should ban bombs too

 

[RobDownSouth]

What do you think is an acceptable rate of kids being killed?

Second amendment absolutists like Richard Dailey and Moochie McMigraines are willing to sacrifice as many school children as needed to maintain their unimpeded access to rapid fire semiautomatics weapons.

The blood of those children are on their enabling hands.

 

[Chancellor_Palpatine]

Was this school shooter - another just today - acting responsibly?

 

[BobaFetaCheese]

Was this school shooter - another just today - acting responsibly?

Apparently not because he's dead and his targets aren't.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Second amendment absolutists like Richard Dailey and Moochie McMigraines are willing to sacrifice as many school children as needed to maintain their unimpeded access to rapid fire semiautomatics weapons.

The blood of those children are on their enabling hands.

Oh look, Rob spreading more lies...You just can't post without lying can you?

I'm surprised you didn't slip a racial slur in there somewhere.

BTW semiautomatic weaponry isn't rapid fire....you ignorant fuck.

Was this school shooter - another just today - acting responsibly?

Clearly not, what's your point?

 

[richard_daily]

What do you think is an acceptable rate of kids being killed?

The actual question you should be asking is what is an acceptable rate of kids who aren't wanted being born?

Kids who are troubled come from parents who don't want them.


In terms of accidents, we already know guns aren't even close to the biggest killer of kids. You want to get rid of your car and your pool, then you can set your sights on stuff that kill kids far less, but if your goal is to protect kids, you'll tackle their biggest killers first.

Unless of course, you have an ulterior agenda.

 

[richard_daily]

Second amendment absolutists like Richard Dailey and Moochie McMigraines are willing to sacrifice as many school children as needed to maintain their unimpeded access to rapid fire semiautomatics weapons.

The blood of those children are on their enabling hands.

More kids die from pools than guns.

More kids die from cars than guns.

Are you giving up your car?

Are you giving up your pool?

If not, then "The blood of those children are on your enabling hands".

 

[Luk]

More kids die from pools than guns.

More kids die from cars than guns.

Are you giving up your car?

Are you giving up your pool?

If not, then "The blood of those children are on your enabling hands".

That argument is still dumb.

 

[Adre]

That argument is still dumb.

Something gun worshippers excel at.