Help lags for homeless female US military veterans

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/2007071...1&printer=1;_ylt=AtGnSpN.2X.bwdm5CXe2AFWOe8UF

Help lags for homeless female veterans

By Bina Venkataraman

Wed Jul 18, 4:00 AM ET

Rachel Caesar, the first American-born in her family of immigrants from Trinidad, served in the National Guard and Army Reserve for 14 years. Today, three years after returning from a tour of duty in Afghanistan, she's out of an apartment, out of work, and, on some days, ready to "run away and hide."

Ms. Caesar still suffers from sleepless nights, jumpiness, and vivid flashbacks of weapon fire and land mine victims. In 2005, her doctors diagnosed her with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); soon after, she had to quit her customer service job of eight years.

After she fell behind in rent, she and her landlord agreed it was time for her to go. "I'm not sure how long I can stay here," she says, of her mother's house in the Dorchester neighborhood of Boston, where she and her two sons have been living for the past two months. "I would go to a shelter, but I don't want to put my kids through that."

Like many women who return from war, Caesar – who calls herself "on the verge of homelessness" – is struggling to adjust to civilian life, make ends meet, and find a permanent home.

An estimated 8,000 female veterans are homeless in the US – the most in the nation's history and a number that is expected to increase as more women return from the war in Iraq. At the same time, services to help these women stay off the streets are lagging behind, say several experts who work with veterans' issues.

"With the likelihood of more women veterans coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan with a need for housing, it's going to be a major, major issue," says Cheryl Beversdorf, executive director of the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, noting that there isn't enough housing to meet even current demands. "The VA is trying to gear up services for women, but frankly it's not enough given what we are dealing with."

Nearly 15 percent of the military is female, which partly explains the increase in female veterans and their homelessness. But of the 260 programs in the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans' network that give counseling, shelter, and other services to homeless veterans, only eight have special programs for women.

Existing programs for women are "probably not yet sufficient. There's not even one in every state," says Pete Dougherty, director of homeless programs at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

He notes, however, that last week the VA announced $12 million in new grants for programs for female, mentally disabled, and elderly veterans – double the current funding for these "special needs" programs. The VA will also fund about 80 additional beds for female veterans in shelters in five states.

The transformed role of women in the military, from nursing and administrative positions to the front lines, experts say, is partly responsible for the increased trauma they experience after war – a factor that increases their risk for homelessness. A woman who has served in the military is up to four times more likely to be homeless than a nonveteran woman.

"Many of the women we see joined the military because they were seeking safety from an abusive step-parent or some sort of sexual abuse," says Toni Reinis, executive director of New Directions, a residential self-help program for veterans in Los Angeles that has treated an estimated 500 female veterans over the past 13 years. "Often they find the military was not, in fact, a safe place."

For female veterans who find themselves on the streets, the problem of finding an adequate shelter is often compounded by fear of sexual abuse. Only a handful of veterans' services around the US have special buildings or floors for women, despite the fact that social workers say separate facilities for homeless female vets are crucial for their recovery. "When you talk to women veterans, you'll hear them clearly say, 'we want a place of our own.' They don't feel safe," says Marsha Four, director of homeless veterans services at the Philadelphia Veterans Multi-service and Education Center.

Many women who served in the military don't perceive themselves as veterans, which can also prevent them from seeking out services, says Ms. Beversdorf. She would like to see the VA undertake a broad-based campaign to educate veterans about their benefits.

One of them is Katye Gates, a veteran from Brimfield, Mass., who served in Iraq for 15 months – running a .50 caliber gunner on more than 180 army convoys. "When I first came back, it was weird because I'd go to vet centers, and it's nearly all men there. But I served my country."

Ms. Gates, a single mother who says she had "a hard time getting help" from the VA to find housing when she returned from Iraq, thinks that the department should institute a "buddy system" to pair up female veterans with others like them in their area.

The needs of women veterans stretch far beyond that for beds in temporary shelters, says Jack Downing, executive director of a VA-funded shelter in Leeds, Mass. "Everything has failed these women," he adds. "They need to be tethered to VA services for the rest of their lives. They need to be permanently connected to something if they are going to make it."

The VA has no permanent housing program for veterans; it only funds "temporary transitional" housing programs around the country. The Department of Housing and Urban Development provides housing vouchers to the homeless that are administered by local authorities. The problem, experts say, is there are not enough affordable housing vouchers for all who need them.

But "if a woman is a veteran, it actually helps," says Beversdorf, because being both female and a veteran elevates her status for housing over other applicants.

Increasingly, veterans are getting connected to services better than ever before, says Mr. Dougherty. "What we're finding is that the vet community is being aggressive about trying to find homeless veterans," he says, noting that many recently returned veterans contact the VA via the Internet if they face health or housing problems.

Beversdorf agrees that there is "a lot more help out there than there was after [the Vietnam War]," in which she served from 1969 to 1971.
 
PoastMonkey said:
He is hoping someone will tell him what it says.
What a fucking douche bag he is, he reads something and starts a thread about it.....idiot

anti American that he is....
 
PoastMonkey said:
He is hoping someone will tell him what it says.
Damn, you two need to slit your wrists and end your miserable lives.

Why are you wasting humanity's oxygen?
 
Faneros said:
What a fucking douche bag he is, he reads something and starts a thread about it.....idiot

anti American that he is....
News flash: Liberals started taking this country back in 2006.

When they take the White House, we're going to brand tards like you as terrorists and have you locked up forever.

Remember the gulags, baby, lol! Butt pyramids for Republicans!

Oh wait, they're into that shit already......
 
It's threads like this that remind me why I think the gubmint ought to be in charge of health care.
 
If private industry were in charge of this, these women might as well slit their wrists outright.

And going by your reasoning, perhaps we should hire mercenaries and privatize the military.

You're an idiot, hambone.
 
LovingTongue said:
If private industry were in charge of this, these women might as well slit their wrists outright.

And going by your reasoning, perhaps we should hire mercenaries and privatize the military.

You're an idiot, hambone.

I'm agreeing with you. The VA as a government entity has done an exemplary job. Just today I read about thousands of returning veterans who are preparing to sue due to shoddy treatment for injuries and PTSD.
I'm thinking if you put gubmint in charge of health care for everyone, as you so strongly recommend - well, based on the track record gubmint has now, the world would be perfect.
You're a genius, LT. Only a genius can ignore what's right in front of him and predict more of it would make things better.
 
Ham Murabi said:
I'm agreeing with you. The VA as a government entity has done an exemplary job. Just today I read about thousands of returning veterans who are preparing to sue due to shoddy treatment for injuries and PTSD.
I'm thinking if you put gubmint in charge of health care for everyone, as you so strongly recommend - well, based on the track record gubmint has now, the world would be perfect.
You're a genius, LT. Only a genius can ignore what's right in front of him and predict more of it would make things better.
Damn, you're an idiot.

Everything is "remove the Government and it'll all be okay" to you. It's like someone saw your skull was empty and stuffed copies of the Limbaugh Letter in there through your ears.
 
Ham Murabi said:
Just today I read about thousands of returning veterans who are preparing to sue due to shoddy treatment for injuries and PTSD.
Shoddy treaatment stateside.......maybe. However, the reason we have such a proliferation of injured returning is due to the excellent care they receive on the battlefield. Otherwise, they would be coming home in body bags.
 
MakersandIce said:
Shoddy treaatment stateside.......maybe. However, the reason we have such a proliferation of injured returning is due to the excellent care they receive on the battlefield. Otherwise, they would be coming home in body bags.
And if we privatized that, they'd be, like, "Oh this one's too injured. That's not profitable. Let's 'forget' about him/her until they die. I mean, it was the Iraqis who shot 'em, it's their fault, right?"
 
LovingTongue said:
And if we privatized that, they'd be, like, "Oh this one's too injured. That's not profitable. Let's 'forget' about him/her until they die. I mean, it was the Iraqis who shot 'em, it's their fault, right?"
We, as a government can't mandate profit margins, nor can we assume the responsibility for every aspect of citizens' lives. We just can't.
 
LovingTongue said:
Damn, you're an idiot.

Everything is "remove the Government and it'll all be okay" to you. It's like someone saw your skull was empty and stuffed copies of the Limbaugh Letter in there through your ears.

You are completely missing my point.
For example, it only took the government 60 more days to build a crosswalk above the Las Vegas Strip than it took a private company to build a $2.7 billion resort.
 
LovingTongue said:
News flash: Liberals started taking this country back in 2006.

When they take the White House, we're going to brand tards like you as terrorists and have you locked up forever.

Remember the gulags, baby, lol! Butt pyramids for Republicans!

Oh wait, they're into that shit already......
The only thing the liberals will do in the White House is tax the shit out of us! Remember I said that when you start bitching and whining in 2009....

Im all for change, but I’m not holding my breath on new initiatives, they won’t get anything done, nothing of real value anyway. Oh maybe gay rights or something to that, but all special interest. They might cut and run us out of Iraq, but seriously, I even doubt that will happen. No coward democrap will take such a stand. Oh Biden talks a good game, but really, how effective is he?
 
Faneros said:
The only thing the liberals will do in the White House is tax the shit out of us! Remember I said that when you start bitching and whining in 2009....
And which Democrat gave us a $6 trillion and then $8 trillion debt?

Hmmm?
 
LovingTongue said:
And which Democrat gave us a $6 trillion and then $8 trillion debt?

Hmmm?

Democrats, you mean. FDR (Social Security) and LBJ (Medicare) have given us a debt about 6 times the figure you cited.
But that's beside the point. Like you, LT, I'm looking forward to a national health care system that works with the same compassion and efficiency as FEMA.
 
Ham Murabi said:
Democrats, you mean. FDR (Social Security) and LBJ (Medicare) have given us a debt about 6 times the figure you cited.
But that's beside the point. Like you, LT, I'm looking forward to a national health care system that works with the same compassion and efficiency as FEMA.
That hasn't given us the debt - the constant raiding of the fund by future politicians of both stripes, did that.

But Reagan and Bush have added trillions on of dollars of debt top of that.

Look up "borrow and spend" some time, crimestoryboy.
 
LovingTongue said:
That hasn't given us the debt - the constant raiding of the fund by future politicians of both stripes, did that.

But Reagan and Bush have added trillions on of dollars of debt top of that.

Look up "borrow and spend" some time, crimestoryboy.

Good people to put your trust in, eh?
 
That's so sad. Are any of them hot? If so, I'll offer them shelter in return for sexual favors.
 
Ham Murabi said:
Democrats, you mean. FDR (Social Security) and LBJ (Medicare) have given us a debt about 6 times the figure you cited.
But that's beside the point. Like you, LT, I'm looking forward to a national health care system that works with the same compassion and efficiency as FEMA.

Almost every 1st world nation in Europe, and Canada has universal healthcare. Ask their citizens about it and they'll tell you they wouldn't get rid of it if their lives depended on it. Ask Americans whether they want universal healthcare, and the majority are in favor.

Keep private healthcare for those who want to pay for it, and also have universal healthcare. It's like education, everybody should have it.
 
GranniesJizz said:
Almost every 1st world nation in Europe, and Canada has universal healthcare. Ask their citizens about it and they'll tell you they wouldn't get rid of it if their lives depended on it. Ask Americans whether they want universal healthcare, and the majority are in favor.

Keep private healthcare for those who want to pay for it, and also have universal healthcare. It's like education, everybody should have it.

All too often their lives do depend on it and the system comes up short. Waiting times for doctors and tests, such as MRIs, are so long that many die before they can get treatment or treatment starts too late to be effective.
I pity those who opt for universal health care because they are sentencing themselves to the same second-rate care that war veterans are receiving. And I pity the taxpayers where universal health care is available.
 
Ham Murabi said:
All too often their lives do depend on it and the system comes up short. Waiting times for doctors and tests, such as MRIs, are so long that many die before they can get treatment or treatment starts too late to be effective.
I pity those who opt for universal health care because they are sentencing themselves to the same second-rate care that war veterans are receiving. And I pity the taxpayers where universal health care is available.

The American system needs to have both, private and universal. It's the same reason so many Americans (individuals and States) buy drugs in Canada. They're not operated by profit driven corps so they're affordable.

Virtually all other 1st world nations have universal healthcare.

The VA is socialist healthcare and it provides excellent care for veterans.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/12/08/eveningnews/main2243606.shtml

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0501.longman.html
 
Back
Top