Hello

[the_bragis]

Something I found intriguing

Hello,

Recently I was asked by someone in here how I interpreted my signature line. It's really interesting to me that he read it in a totally different way to what I did.

Now I am curious to know how other people may see it.

Particularly if women tend to view it differently from men.

Alex(fem)

 

[karmadog]

Siggy had a desire free marriage. He wrote very romantic letters to his wife before they were married, but after the wedding they read like laundry lists.

Like all of Freud's theories, this suffers from his unscientific habit of taking very specific situations and then making broad generalizations from them.

In my experience, this is not factual, but my longest relationship was only three years.

BTW, I don't think Freud would have agreed with my sig line at all.

 

[its Leslie]

Hmm looking at your sig Kharma I guess I am a totally conflicting view point.

Sex and the need for sexual contact between humans is definitely important to me.

If you cut out intimacy, your rip the heart out of a relationship.

Sure my body will shut down rather fast if I start bleeding uncontrollably or if I run out of air, but that doesn't really say anything about the importance of intimacy (it merely points out some biological functions can't be ignored).

If tomorrow all the women of the world disappeared, I doubt if I would even care if the dawn rose again on my life.

Marriage without sex, is merely an arrangement to limit ones freedom for no reason.
I can get anyone to live with me, help with household chores, spend time with, and share financial burdens (doesn't even have to be the opposite gender for me if there is no sex).
But marriage is (in my opinion) about saying, you will agree to not fuck someone else (otherwise why do the courts get involved if you do).
If you are not fucking that special person, then why get married in the first place.

Oh and lets just nip the retorts in the bud, I can love a person and not need to fuck them. But I won't fuck someone I don't love. Love is easy to give out, no one minds who or how many you love.

So saying you got married, and that love is enough is stupid (yes I said stupid, and I know some of you out their will flip out on me, but like you should know by now how I will respond). You don't have to get married just because you are in love.
You don't need a marriage certificate to love a person. But it sure is required if you want to fuck them exclusively (and they will bash you in court if you go fuck someone else).

 

[Guest]

Re: Something I found intriguing

Hello,

Recently I was asked by someone in here how I interpreted my signature line. It's really interesting to me that he read it in a totally different way to what I did.

Now I am curious to know how other people may see it.

Particularly if women tend to view it differently from men.

Alex(fem)

Alex-

I see the disparity already!

I interpret your sig line in this manner: One has no desires beyond their significant other because one is fulfilled by one's love. If there are desires beyond a significant other, one should question one's love.

In light of karmadog's post, I am interpreting incorrectly, but I like mine better!

I also have had mixed interpretations of my sig line....

b

 

[Guest]

I interpret this as "the grass is always greener" (as karmadog was saying).

My sig line is far too deep to be interpreted by anyone!!

I've had serious - now I'm into shameless self-promotion)

But Kdog - oh my - reminds me of the quote of how love has pitched his tent close to the place of excrement (can you say excrement on this site??)

 

[karmadog]

Buk wasn't saying sex wasn't important and neither am I. He was saying that it isn't everything--just pointing out the obvious in a mildly amusing way.

Les, if all the women in the world disappeared tomorrow, I'd kill myself. Less because of the loss of sexual partners than because the world would consist of nothing but sports and hamburgers. How dull.

 

[Killswitch]

"We covet what we see every day" ( Silence of the Lambs)

"We want what we can not have" (Unknown origin)

"The masse's are incurably ignorant" (Ayan Rand)

" The many, out weigh the need's of the few...or the one" (Spock)

I dont know.....But these quote's came to mind while pondering this thread, and the sig line in question.

I do know that we as humans tend to treat our loved ones quite rudely a lot of times, and we are generally always polite to strangers.

Maybe its not completely "On Topic" but its what came to mind......

Killswitch