Hell has frozen over. Koch brother almost endorses Clinton

[someoneyouknow]

Washington (CNN)Oil tycoon and conservative mega-donor Charles Koch had kind words for both Bill and Hillary Clinton in an interview Sunday, saying there was an outside chance he could support her in November.

"We would have to believe her actions would be quite different than her rhetoric. Let me put it that way," he said on ABC's "This Week" Sunday. "But on some of the Republican candidates we would -- before we could support them, we'd have to believe their actions will be quite different than the rhetoric we've heard so far."

Earlier in the interview, Koch said Bill Clinton was better than George W. Bush on issues of economic growth and government spending but did not offer a full-throated endorsement of either Clinton.

"As far as the growth of government, the increase in spending, on restrictive regulations, it was two-and-a-half times under Bush than it was under Clinton," Koch told ABC.

Asked if it was possible another Clinton could be better than a Republican, Koch said: "It's possible."

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/24/politics/charles-koch-hillary-clinton-2016/index.html

 

[Hypoxia]

Continuing to demonstrate just how corporate-friendly (or -dependent) the DINO Clintons are.

Shall USA voters prefer a corporate whore or a corporate pimp?

That shall likely be the choice in November.

Business as usual.

 

[BotanyBoy]

LOL and all the progressives flipped shit when I called her a NeoCon and might as well be Romney in a pantsuit.....

"Nuh UHHH!!! Shez TRUE progressive liberal!! Sanders is pie in the sky liar! CNN SAID SO!! "

I hope Koch gives her money.....she'll take it

 

[JackLuis]

Hillary is the "Camel's Nose" of neo-liberals in the Democrat's "Big Tent".

 

[someoneyouknow]

The one thing Koch hints at, and history has shown to be true, the stock market and economy, on the whole, do better under a Democratic administration than under a Republican.

From 2004:

http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/21/markets/election_demsvreps/

From earlier in 2016:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-02-22/stocks-return-more-with-dem-in-white-house-bgov-barometer

 

[PoisonedChalice]

As I predicted, one by one the fat cats will line up behind Hillary. They don't want to risk losing their precious. How I love seeing the Democrat PC pieces of shit line up in file and embrace big money.

"Yes daddy please oh please give me cash! Pump me full!!!! Oh how I love you so much...I didn't really mean those things I said! I just hated Trump and thought you liked him!"

Suck on that gold while it's still worth something. You are all cheap (and ugly) whores. He who supports immigration "reform" helps Wall Street disenfranchise his neighbours. Despite this irony I'm sure certain members will have a collective orgasm at the thought of big business merging with the SJW left to beat evil, hateful, ignorant white people into submission.

Neither of you can afford to have an independent, free-thinking group of people capable of creating their own future.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Hillary's response: Shove it

Hillary Clinton told Charles Koch that she has no interest in endorsements from people who make deny climate science and make it harder for people to vote.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

If you saw the interview and not just read the headlines he said something like 'her policies would have to be a lot different from her rhetoric for me to support her'.

This was the media's biggest pantload story of the weekend.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Hillary's response: Shove it

I'm fucking shocked the scum bag didn't take it and ask for mega bucks.

It doesn't shock me however that she's more concerned about climate change than the laundry list of plutocratic scummery that guy engages in.....real knows real when it sees it I suppose.

If you saw the interview and not just read the headlines he said something like 'her policies would have to be a lot different from her rhetoric for me to support her'.

This was the media's biggest pantload story of the weekend.

Good thing for him it's almost certain her policies will be LOL!!

 

[someoneyouknow]

If you saw the interview and not just read the headlines he said something like 'her policies would have to be a lot different from her rhetoric for me to support her'.

This was the media's biggest pantload story of the weekend.

You mean like the first sentence of the second paragraph I posted above?

"We would have to believe her actions would be quite different than her rhetoric. Let me put it that way," he said on ABC's "This Week" Sunday.