Having trouble with your planet?

photographer

Really Really Experienced
Joined
Jun 6, 2001
Posts
307
Having problems with your planet?

You can still change the world by dreaming it,
You still have your tricks, old, unteachable, untameable;
You could still make an eland from a piece of old boot,
You could still create the moon from an old bent shoe.


A good friend of mine, an environmental lawyer, and I were discussing the world’s illnesses. He got to wondering why all laws treated humans as subjects and everything else as objects.
“The only rights recognised in law are those enforceable in a court of law, and these may only be held by human beings. This means that, from the perspective of our legal systems, the millions of other species on the planet are outlaws. And that’s precisely how we treat them”

“Thirteen billion years ago the universe began as hydrogen. Left entirely to itself, the hydrogen became rose bushes, giraffes and humans.”
Physicist Brian Swimme


The timescale of earth is divided into eras,. Precambrian beginning about 800 million years ago, then moving up to the present through Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic.
In the 70 million years of the Cenozoic Era the story of life on the planet flowed over into what could be termed the lyric period of Earth history. The trees had developed nearly 200 million years before this, the flowers had appeared perhaps 30 million years before, mammals already existed in rudimentary form.
But in the Cenozoic Era there was wave upon wave of life development, with the flowers, the birds, the trees and the mammal species, particularly, all leading to that luxuriant display of life upon Earth such as we have known it. All without human interference.

Towards the end of the Cenozoic our ancestors arrived on the scene, but for most of their 3 million or so years, they existed alongside the rest of creation without interfering much.

Then, in the late 18th century, we began the wide-scale use of fossil fuels, and with this came the tools and social conditions to utterly alter the planet’s biological and geographic history.


How did we do this?

Well, take carbon. It’s a magical element, present in all living things, but too much of it in the wrong places is a bad thing, as anyone who lives downwind from a factory will tell you. The Earth has immense quantities of the stuff, but nature achieved a safe balance by storing it in coal and oil deposits and great forests. By liberating it through burning, humans have profoundly affected the rhythms of the atmospheric world. Then there’s river pollution, sea pollution, mono-crop production, ozone depletion, habitat destruction, mass species extinction ……..

While we achieved magnificent things, we’ve stacked up deadly problems at the planetary level.

In the 20th Century, for the first time, the industrial context of human society was a defining element in the functioning of other life systems on the planet.

This is a time of planetary depletion of resources in which humans are the primary agents of biological history. It’s a period in which extinctions are taking place on a scale unequalled since the terminal phase of the Mesozoic Era (which saw the end of the dinosaurs). Some estimates place the loss of species at around 10 000 a year.

We are upsetting the entire Earth system, which, over billions of years and through an endless sequence of groping, of trials and errors, has produced a magnificent array of living forms, forms capable of seasonal renewal over vast periods of time. Most amazing is the inability of our religious or educational establishments to provide any effective religious or ethical judgement on what is happening.
The natural world surrounding us is simply regarded as the context in which human affairs takes place. In the presence of humans, the natural world has no rights. We have a moral sense of suicide, homicide and genocide, but no moral sense of biocide or geocide, the killing of the life systems themselves and even the killing of the Earth.

We find ourselves ethically destitute just when, for the first time, we are faced with the irreversible closing down of the Earth’s functioning in its major life systems.

Both science and religion suffer from a ‘dysfunctional cosmology’. Unless we learn that the universe is a communion of subjects, not a collection of objects, that our actions and laws are subordinate to those of the planet, we are heading into an evolutionary cul-de-sac. The result will be survivors, if there are any, living with all their resentments amid the destroyed infrastructures of the industrial world and amid the ruins of the natural world itself.

The solution lies not in science or technology, but in a moral, ethical, legal and spiritual re-tracking. For millennia, life systems have worked on balance, where no life system utterly overwhelms another. But our technologies have enabled us to transcend this situation. We have no limit. So the basic recipe for our survival has to be self-limiting with regard to resources, habitat, population and consumption. We have to learn, by fear if necessary, that everything lives in and by everything else.

We could term this era the Ecozoic Era, a time in which harmony with nature is restored by force of will.

We are, in these final years of the Cenozoic Era, “between stories”. What we need now is a new Great Story to heal our rift with the spirit of nature.

No one ever before could tell, in such lyrical language as we can now, the story of the primordial flaring forth of the universe at its beginning, the shaping of the immense number of stars gathered into galaxies, the collapse of the first generation of stars to create 90-something elements, the gravitational gathering of scattered star-stuff into our solar system with its nine planets, the formation of Earth with its seas and atmospheres and the continents crashing and rifting as they move over the asthenosphere, and awakening of life.

Such a marvel is this 15-billion year process; such infinite numbers of living things on Earth, such limitless variety of flowering species and forms of animal life, such tropical luxuriance. Now we are experiencing the pathos of witnessing the desecration of all this.
We urgently need to tell this story, to meditate on it, and listen to it as it is told by every breeze that blows, by every cloud in the sky, by every mountain and river and woodland, and by the song of every cricket ….

Looking for alternatives, the realisation slowly dawns that the answer may come from the remnants of older cultures: the Bushmen, the Amerindian, Aborigines and others, people who, for thousands of years, learned to live in harmony with nature.
They have the ingredients for the new Great Story. We need to cherish them and learn their stories with humility before they are lost forever.

We should all strive to think like a mountain, breathe like a tree and allow our minds to move like water.
 
“Thirteen billion years ago the universe began as hydrogen. Left entirely to itself, the hydrogen became rose bushes, giraffes and humans.”
Physicist Brian Swimme


Did someone mention giraffes??:D

Thank you photographer... and by the depth and length of your discussion, there is no doubt your friend is a lawyer!!:D :rose:
 
Giraffe for JennyOmanHill

Yup! Sure did - one of my all time favourite animals. Go and check the Safari thread - there are pics of giraffes, and others, there.
Enjoy
 
Photographer dude. I have a great attention span. I don't mind reading educational material. Your message was / IS very important. But it won't fly here.

Break it up it to little sound bites. Add pictures. Jazz it up. Share your message, but make sure your audience is getting the message.

You remember the professor who got up in front of the class and talked for 40 to 50 minuets, and never asked questions right? That is what you sounded like.

I am on your side. We only have one spaceship, and we are treating it like crap.
 
Photographer, humans change their environment, that is what people do. Everyone, including bushmen etc has an environmental impact. Some of Europe, which I can be more certain about because of proximity, were pretty much like it is now, and highly 'man-made' 4000 years ago. Most of the larger animals were extinct long before anyone thought of setting fire to coal, and in many cases entirely due to human causes.

You can't blame it on industrialisation, that is just too short sighted.

The solution is the same as the cause of the problem, humans can shape their environment around their needs.
 
Reply

Thanks for the comments, Sch00lteacher. Valid point. I'll remember your advice.

Munchin Mark : But man, in shaping the environment around their needs in such a selfish, materialistic fashion, have royally fucked up our little planet, and there is no cure.

You say it can't be blamed on industrialisation?

Think again

The world's ills are directly as a result of industrialisation and man's innate greed.
 
Who is actually to say the problem is as big as you suggest? Comparing past extinction rates to the present one has two big problems attached.

Firstly not everything that has ever lived has been found as a fossil. Fossil populations are not necessarily representative of a true ecosystem (they are usually death assemblages, that is they have been transported away from where they lived after death, getting sorted by size shape etc in a way which biases the outcome). They are also biased because of the haphazard way that preservation takes place. Fossil species and genera are entirely diagnosed by morphology. If it looks like then it is.

The modern ecosystem is all there, nothing missing. It has no biases other than those imposed by a collector in the field. That is one big difference. Another is that there are more ways to define a living species. Morphology of soft tissues, including colouration. Genetic differences. And the important one that nobody ever takes the time to check, mating. One of the definitions of a species is that it cannot breed successfully with another species. Nobody checks this with, say all of those damn beetles. So how many are varieties and how many are species?

As a result, comparing the modern rate of extinction with the past is very hard because you don't have all of the information and teh information is not neccessarily accurate anyway.

Also, according to the people who think they have accurate enough data, today's diversity outshines anything ever seen before in the history of the planet. By a magnitude.

So we have an exceptionally high diversity of life at the moment according to these people. What happens when something is further away from the normal balance? It goes back. There will be exticntion because there are not enough niches any more. That is a factor which has been influenced by both climate change (over the past 18000 years or so, we are just coming out of a glacial period remember) and human activity, (the spread of agriculture, the slash and burn agriculture practiced by many jungle peoples, hunting, just walking around etc). And on top of that the last 200 years has seen the widespread burning of fossil fuels and excessive urbanisation. No doubt these two do have an effect, but given everything else that is happening and the subjectivityof the data you have to base your ideas on, how can you possibly say that it is all industrialisation?
 
Back
Top