Hats off to the Bush administration! New High on Dow Jones, Low taxes equal high empl

amicus

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
14,812
Hats off to the Bush administration! New High on Dow Jones, Low taxes equal high employment!

Definition:
[noun] an indicator of stock market prices; based on the share values of 30 blue-chip stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange; "the Dow Jones Industrial Average is the most widely cited indicator of how the stock market is doing"
Synonyms: Dow Jones, Dow-Jones Industrial Average


Dow Jones & Company (NYSE: DJ), based in the United States, is a publishing and financial information firm.
The company was founded in 1882 by three reporters: Charles Dow, Edward Jones, and Charles Bergstresser. Like The New York Times and the Washington Post, the company is publicly traded but privately controlled. The company is led by the Bancroft family, and is not the subsidiary of a multinational corporation.

Print publishing
Its flagship publication, The Wall Street Journal, is a daily newspaper covering U.S. and international business and financial news and issues. It began publishing on July 8, 1889.


~~~~~~~~
President Hoover and the market crash…


http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1580.html

After just eight months in office, on October 29, 1929, the stock market crashed, fueling a growing depression that became the most severe economic crisis the United States had ever known, and second only to the Civil War as the greatest domestic crisis in the nation's history.

Although Hoover has been blamed for the stock market crash, he, in fact, warned President Coolidge in 1925 about the dangers of excessive stock market speculation. He again expressed concern while running for president in 1928.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I was thinking of how the Bush administration, after 8 months in office…was hit with the terrorist disaster in New York City.

I was also thinking of the Jimmy Carter years, both an economic disaster and a hostage crisis in Iran and how the Reagan Presidency turned the nation around in short order by a firm military policy and a massive tax cut across the board.

A conservative pundit on Fox News sarcastically said, “ah, yes, the democrats will say that Bush talked to his buddies in the oil business and lowered gas prices just before the election…he also talked to his cronies on Wall Street to influence the Dow Jones average to reach news highs….”

Yeah, sure, and Carl Rove is the devil incarnate and Dick Cheney really runs the government.

Democrats are ridiculously funny at times.


So, I wish to offer a true and sincere word of appreciation to President Bush, Vice President Cheney and each and every individual in the cabinet and the entire Bush administration for five and a half years of truly heroic and patriotic service to the nation.

After the disaster of 9/11, that brought the worlds financial capitol to it’s knees, shook the very foundation of business around the world, caused stock markets to tumble globally, five years later, business and the stock market have recovered and gone on to new highs; and please remember the Airline Industry, staggered by not just the events, but the implications of the attack.

If that tragedy was not enough for one President to oversee, factor in now please, the disaster of Hurricane Katrina that destroyed about thirty percent of the nations capability to refine, process and distribute petroleum products. It also closed down one of the largest Ports in the Nation, the Port of New Orleans, which handled nearly fifty percent of the agriculture export output of the middle west breadbasket of America and employs and sustains millions across the nation. A tremendous double whammy on both the economy and the morale of an entire nation.

Yet, Bush came through, stayed the course and began a measured retaliation against terrorist forces around the world. It is being done with a terrible cost in human life and a staggering cost in resources, not just here, but around the world.

And yet…and yet…the economy is booming, employment is at an all time high, the housing boom, new homes and jobs for Americans, continues.

And with the tax cuts of the Bush administration, the national debt is being reduced and the yearly deficit grows smaller each accounting period.

Liberals have a hard time equating lower taxes with high government revenue, but it remains a fact whether the left admits it or not.

Liberals also don’t like to admit that ‘entitlement programs’ those utopian socialist programs that became law under FDR and LBJ, social security and medicare and such, consume 60 to 80 percent of government tax revenue each year, leaving just a minor percentage of tax revenue for all the other ‘necessary’ government programs such as defense of the nation.


Although the Democrats quiver and quake and whine and criticize and complain, The Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security has for five years prevented further attacks on American soil.

I cannot predict that the American voting public will understand and reward Republicans with an affirmation in November and in 2008, but I suspect they will.


Amicus….
 
amicus said:
I cannot predict that the American voting public will understand and reward Republicans with an affirmation in November and in 2008, but I suspect they will.


Amicus….
Let's balance that statement with Domestic Spying, Torture of Prisoners, Loss of Personal Freedom in the name of fighting Terrorism Around the World, A War Started with Outright Lies and Misinformation and so on.

I'm certain the American Voter will see the light in November and make GW a true Lame Duck.
 
[I said:
Jenny_Jackson]Let's balance that statement with Domestic Spying, Torture of Prisoners, Loss of Personal Freedom in the name of fighting Terrorism Around the World, A War Started with Outright Lies and Misinformation and so on.

I'm certain the American Voter will see the light in November and make GW a true Lame Duck.
[/I]

~~~~~

Jenny...your recital of the left wing propaganda mantra, will neither sway nor balance the truth..

There is no domestic spying, Abu Graib, as the fullness of time has shown was an isolated event, most people recognize the necessity for tighter security post 9/11, and the war on terror started long before Bush came into office, had Clinton not been so involved in chasing pussy, he would have responded to an invitation to capture UBL and he would have retaliated for the USS Cole incident, instead he had his fingers in Monica's privates....ahem, at least his fingers...

amicus...
 
I think your incorrect…did he actually use his fingers or was it a cigar? :devil:

:nana:

amicus said:
[/I]

~~~~~

Jenny...your recital of the left wing propaganda mantra, will neither sway nor balance the truth..

There is no domestic spying, Abu Graib, as the fullness of time has shown was an isolated event, most people recognize the necessity for tighter security post 9/11, and the war on terror started long before Bush came into office, had Clinton not been so involved in chasing pussy, he would have responded to an invitation to capture UBL and he would have retaliated for the USS Cole incident, instead he had his fingers in Monica's privates....ahem, at least his fingers...

amicus...
 
Last edited:
jeninflorida said:
I think your incorrect…did he actually use his fingers or was it a cigar? :devil:

:nana:

~~~~~~

chuckles, yeah, you be right, although I wasn't present to witness the penetration, and I am guilty of using just a smidge of poetic license in my delivery...grins...

amicus...
 
I'm no fan of high taxes, ami, but even I see this as nothing more than a way to bribe voters and donors by refusing to cut spending along with taxes. The old-line conservatives used to favor cuts in spending to balance the tax cuts. The current approach is fiscally irresponsible. It creates a deficit.

Also, I have to agree with Jenny Jackson on the scales here. My vote won't be bought. I will not vote for the Bush/Cheney clique of the GOP ever again, at any price. If they think that they can bribe me to vote for tyranny, they have a lot of nerve.
 
[QUOTE=SEVERUSMAX]I'm no fan of high taxes, ami, but even I see this as nothing more than a way to bribe voters and donors by refusing to cut spending along with taxes. The old-line conservatives used to favor cuts in spending to balance the tax cuts. The current approach is fiscally irresponsible. It creates a deficit.

Also, I have to agree with Jenny Jackson on the scales here. My vote won't be bought. I will not vote for the Bush/Cheney clique of the GOP ever again, at any price. If they think that they can bribe me to vote for tyranny, they have a lot of nerve.[/QUOTE]


~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, Sev, have it your own way, I guess. You do not that a majority of the federal budget, between 60 and 80 percent is allocated to 'entitlement programs' that cannot be cut or rescinded? that leaves 20 to 40 percent for all the legitimate programs of government, those constitutionally authorized and mandated and so the battle between elements of moderate republicans and the left, is a trade-off of votes which insures rising expenditures.

You figure a way around that?

and I suggest that the patriot act and homeland security and the other agencies of government which have prevented attacks on us for five years, are sufficient rational for the increased security at the airport and elsewhere...

amicus...
 
amicus said:
Hats off to the Bush administration! New High on Dow Jones, Low taxes equal high employment!

Amicus….

Whoooo-eeeeee! In only 6 short years the DJIA is back where it was. However, the Nasdaq is still a long long way from its highs during the Clinton administration. Not to worry, King Bush the second still has two more years to try to recapture our former glories. But all and all, I must admit any sort of positive is a good thing ..... especially under a Republican. ;-)

However, let's not add inflation into the equation, unless of course we want certain people to take off the rose-colored glasses. You know, when you increase spending without a subsequent increase in the tax base, you are basically printing money. When you print money, you are in essence, instituting a tax on money. Bush is a liberal. An anti-FDR. He robs from the poor and middle class and gives to the rich. Spending has increased dramatically under his administration. Taxes have rise, whether you choose to believe it or not. At least mine have. You are living in a fantasy world if you think otherwise.
 
amicus said:
[/I]

~~~~~

Jenny...your recital of the left wing propaganda mantra, will neither sway nor balance the truth..

There is no domestic spying, Abu Graib, as the fullness of time has shown was an isolated event, most people recognize the necessity for tighter security post 9/11, and the war on terror started long before Bush came into office, had Clinton not been so involved in chasing pussy, he would have responded to an invitation to capture UBL and he would have retaliated for the USS Cole incident, instead he had his fingers in Monica's privates....ahem, at least his fingers...

amicus...
Those are nice blinders. Where can I get a pair? :rolleyes:
 
amicus said:
~~~~~~

chuckles, yeah, you be right, although I wasn't present to witness the penetration, and I am guilty of using just a smidge of poetic license in my delivery...grins...

amicus...


Oh my god, we agree on one thing!
 
Halo_n_horns said:
Those are nice blinders. Where can I get a pair? :rolleyes:


Blinders can be purchased down on this little island, off of Honduras. The magical location is called Anthony’s key. It’s a special place and one that I love to retire to. If you like to dive, then ask me for more info. No, I do not have any economic interest there, yet. However, our goal is to move there in ten years.
 
amicus said:
[/I]

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, Sev, have it your own way, I guess. You do not that a majority of the federal budget, between 60 and 80 percent is allocated to 'entitlement programs' that cannot be cut or rescinded? that leaves 20 to 40 percent for all the legitimate programs of government, those constitutionally authorized and mandated and so the battle between elements of moderate republicans and the left, is a trade-off of votes which insures rising expenditures.

You figure a way around that?

and I suggest that the patriot act and homeland security and the other agencies of government which have prevented attacks on us for five years, are sufficient rational for the increased security at the airport and elsewhere...

amicus...

Oh, come on! We can at least cut about 10% in discretionary spending, I'm sure. Defense doesn't take up that much of the budget. We can also sell off some public land, privatize Amtrak, end the war on drugs, and stop any new tax cuts for now, until a solution is found to at least make Social Security and Medicare solvent again. A lot of inmates in federal prisons don't belong there and cost tons of millions. Oh, wait, that's the war on drugs again.

And we can end the war in Iraq at some point, so that we can replenish our national defense without costing too much on a war that is now properly an Iraqi matter.

Oh, and I don't really care for the whole illegal detention and domestic espionage thing.
 
jeninflorida said:
Oh my god, we agree on one thing!


I don't suppose the cigar was a swisher sweet? Naw, smuggled cuban leaf no doubt, from papa hemingways stash...sighs...oh to live the good life again...
 
Back
Top