Has Bilderberg selected Romney to replace Obama?

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
The Bilderberg Group, a shadowy organization composed of hundreds of the most powerful and influence individuals in politics, business, finance, and media in the free world, has just concluded its annual private meeting at which global movers and shakers plan major world affairs for the coming year.

Over the years, future Presidents have often payed homage at the secret confab including Bill Clinton, GW Bush, and Barack Obama who all visited just prior to their election.

This year, numerous reports indicate that Mitt Romney was a special secret guess:

The items discussed during last week’s Bilderberg Conference might remain under lock and key, but some eyewitnesses on hand at the elusive meeting of the elite say they might know who was involved in the top-secret talks.

The Bilderberg Group has officially released what they say is the list of attendees invited to last week’s conference outside of Washington, D.C. in Chantilly, Virginia, but others insist that they caught one high-profile personality on hand that was excluded from the official roster. According to some sources, presidential hopeful Mitt Romney made it to this year’s event.

Charlie Skelton, a contributor for the UK’s Guardian, claims that “four eyewitnesses on the hotel staff” have confirmed to him that former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was on hand at the 2012 Bilderberg Conference.

http://rt.com/usa/news/mitt-romney-bilderberg-conference-184/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-...ilderberg-2012-chantilly-occupy?newsfeed=true
 
If you're unfamiliar with the shadowy mechanations of Bilderberg, here's some good background:

http://americanfreepress.net/?p=4431

Basically, virtually the entire global elite meet in secret and discuss world affairs "off the record." Over the years, leaks from the meeting have proven that many coming events are in fact decided undemocratically at the secretive meeting.
 
On the plus side, at least if you think its a good thing, the group is pretty much non-partisan.

The partisan dog and pony show is for the masses. In private the world elites decide the real agenda for the world that will then be placed into the pre-established partisan frameworks in the various countries.
 
The Bilderbergers are just deluded puppets of the Illuminati Jewmasons.
 
The Bilderbergers are just deluded puppets of the Illuminati Jewmasons.

So, nothing to worry about. They are just harmless good old boys meeting for drinks and a few non-political laughs. Its just a social event, right? :rolleyes:
 
Well, you partisan Obamaheads should at least be concerned.

After all, in the words of Minister Farakhan, Obama "was selected before he was elected." It looks like he could be in the process of being "deselected before he is unelected."
 
So, anyone who thinks there is plot by environmentalists to fool everyone into thinking their is global warming is wearing tin foil?

Anyone who thinks Fox News is a plot to brainwash people into voting for the GOP is wearing tin foil?

Anyone who thinks big corporations or big unions have an influence over politics is wearing tin foil?

Thanks for clearing that up. :rolleyes:
 
If you want to know the truth about the world, read up on Bilderberg.

If you want to keep your head in the sand and be happy and laugh at those who actually are open minded enough to actually consider the facts, you won't have any idea what is really going on, but whatever makes you happy.

By the way, The Guardian is hardly a "fringe" paper. Its obnoxiously leftwing, but certainly part of the mainstream media.
 
Geezus, ruse...

...you act like the last time the B's met in the USSA in 2008, Billary and Barry were fighting tooth and nail for the Democrat top spot; and then, just after both were invited and did attend that same B meet, suddenly the battle was over - just like if it had been decided.

Surely, that's not what you're hinting at here...
 
Geezus, ruse...

...you act like the last time the B's met in the USSA in 2008, Billary and Barry were fighting tooth and nail for the Democrat top spot; and then, just after both were invited and did attend that same B meet, suddenly the battle was over - just like if it had been decided.

Surely, that's not what you're hinting at here...

I don't know if they had a horse in the primaries, but there is a clear pattern of candidates who attend the conference being elected later in the year.
 
RationalWiki is your friend:

"Bilderberg" is the nickname given to an annual invitation-only meeting of political, business, and media figures which is usually held in Europe, or sometimes North America. The name comes from the Hotel de Bilderberg in the Netherlands where the first such meeting took place in 1954.

The first meeting was initiated by Joseph Retinger, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, Belgian prime minister Paul Van Aeeland, and Dutch industrialist Paul Rijkens. The group was concerned about the rise of anti-Americanism in Europe and about the threat of Soviet Communism, and sought to bring together a variety of political and business leaders from both liberal and conservative points of view to discuss public policy and to foster greater cooperation among the nations of Europe and the United States. These conferences have been held every year since on an invitation-only basis.

Ironically given the anti-Communist intent of the original meetings, the annual Bilderberg conferences were since seized upon by conspiracy theorists as another arm of the "conspiracy", and secretly working to promote socialism, European unification, or a world government. An early critic was Phyllis Schlafly who, in her 1964 book A Choice, Not An Echo, claimed a liberal conspiracy of "kingmakers" led by the Bilderberg group had control over the Republican Party presidential nominating process and kept real conservatives from getting the nomination; her book was written in part to promote the 1964 campaign of Barry Goldwater, seen (by Schlafly) as a candidate free of Bilderberg influence. Another U.S. group, the right-wing Liberty Lobby (founded c. 1955 by Willis Carto) took it upon themselves to send reporter James Tucker every year to "infiltrate" the Bilderberg conferences and report on their nefarious activities.

The Bilderberg meetings continue to be referenced today in the context of New World Order conspiracy theories. The popularity of conspiracy theories about the Bilderberg meetings grew during the 1990s because Bill Clinton had attended in 1991, one year before being elected President of the United States. The meetings have become a magnet for conspiracy theorists,[1] and, in turn, a magnet for journalists intent on doing some crackpot-watching.

In 2010, the minutes of a number of Bilderberg meetings were posted to Wikileaks.[2] They turned out not to be all that interesting.
 
Sorry, KingO, you ignore the dangers of Bildgerberg at your own risk. Keep your head in the sand and be an uncool conformist all you wish.

What exactly is the legimate purpose of a secret meeting of world elites (many of whom travel to said secret meeting at taxpayer expense)?

If they aren't there for any reason, why are they there at all? :confused:
 
For decades the organizers of the meeting steadfastly denied the meetings even took place.

If it hadn't been for the tireless work of independent-minded journalist Jim Tucker, the meetings would almost certainly still be publically denied. Now they just issue phony and unverifiable press-releases as to what is discussed.

Thank you Jim Tucker for your years of service to humanity on this issue. :)
 
Back
Top