Happy Birthday Americans!

amicus

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
14,812
Declaration of Independence


Here is the complete text of the Declaration of Independence.
The original spelling and capitalization have been retained.

(Adopted by Congress on July 4, 1776)

The Unanimous Declaration
of the Thirteen United States of America
Teachers & Students: Free Downloads of Rare Scenes Of Early America's People, Places & Events!


When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:



For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts: John Hancock, Samual Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut: Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York: William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey: Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania: Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware: Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland: Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia: George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina: William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia: Button Gwinnett, ***** Hall, George Walton

Source: The Pennsylvania Packet, July 8, 1776


~~~

:rose:

edited to add: http://www.amazon.com/1776-Restored-Directors-William-Daniels/dp/B000067D1R

The 1969 musical...one might search and find the video...
 
Last edited:
(Adopted by Congress on July 4, 1776)

The Unanimous Declaration
of the Thirteen United States of America
Teachers & Students: Free Downloads of Rare Scenes Of Early America's People, Places & Events!


When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation....

Proof that the founding fathers thought education a federal responsibility. . . :D

Happy Birthday to US!

btw, you can find some wonderful clips from the musical on youtube, including several, such as "Lee's Reprise," that were cut from the original movie. Note the leer on Ben Franklin's face when RH Lee refers to the "full-bosomed" women of Virginia.
 
Last edited:
questions for amicus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1) in what ways did the US citzens in 1799 [post BR], have more freedom than in 1770 [pre DI]?

2) in what ways did US citizens in 1799, have more freedoms than those in England at that date? (i.e. compare 'freedom' US v. England, in 1799).

3) are the US citizens [yes, i'm one] the freest in the world at present, compared to those in other 'advanced countries' (e.g. G-20)? are they living better overall (freedom, health, happiness, etc.) than those in other advanced countries?
 
Proof that the founding fathers thought education a federal responsibility. . . :D

Happy Birthday to US!

btw, you can find some wonderful clips from the musical on youtube, including several, such as "Lee's Reprise," that were cut from the original movie. Note the leer on Ben Franklin's face when RH Lee refers to the "full-bosomed" women of Virginia.[/
QUOTE]

~~~

Chuckles...you go to any length to increase the size and scope of the Feds...and of course, that is your right to think and speak thus.

Knowing as we do, the varieties of 'education' and with the thousands of examples of differences of opinion, it is clear to me that education is and ought always be, an individual's responsibility.

:)

ami
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1) in what ways did the US citzens in 1799 [post BR], have more freedom than in 1770 [pre DI]?

2) in what ways did US citizens in 1799, have more freedoms than those in England at that date? (i.e. compare 'freedom' US v. England, in 1799).

3) are the US citizens [yes, i'm one] the freest in the world at present, compared to those in other 'advanced countries' (e.g. G-20)? are they living better overall (freedom, health, happiness, etc.) than those in other advanced countries
?

~~~

Glen Beck (rue the name, I know) presented some interesting historical data concerning 'Black Founding Father's', and 'Women Founding Father's', which indicated that our 'taught' history, has left out a great deal of the actual history that took place in the early days of America.

Pure, you always confuse your concepts of the role of government with those outlined in our basic documents. There is so much you ignore when it comes to how an individual earns the values in his life; you replace that individual initiative and responsibility with the overweaning concern of the collective, of large, intrusive government, that you fail to recognize the beauty of the true rights of the individual man.

You always advocate exchanging freedom for health and secured happiness when those things are the province of the individual to acquire and maintain.

You are not alone of course, but thus far, you remain in the minority; I hope you always will.

Amicus
 
Last edited:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1) in what ways did the US citzens in 1799 [post BR], have more freedom than in 1770 [pre DI]?

2) in what ways did US citizens in 1799, have more freedoms than those in England at that date? (i.e. compare 'freedom' US v. England, in 1799).

3) are the US citizens [yes, i'm one] the freest in the world at present, compared to those in other 'advanced countries' (e.g. G-20)? are they living better overall (freedom, health, happiness, etc.) than those in other advanced countries?

Since amicus isn't likely to answer those questions, here are mine, 1 and 2 of which exclude Native Americans and slaves:

1. They weren't taxed without the consent of their elected representatives. The fact that most of them still had no say in the elections was no different in the US or UK.

2. Probably none, but slightly more in the former thirteen colonies than they had before 1799, when they weren't allowed representational government.

(But slavery was outlawed in the UK at that time - so any slaves landed in the UK automatically became free)

3. The answer to this depends on your definitions of "living better overall" and "freedom", "health", "happiness", and particularly "etc." Depending on the definitions, different countries, including the US, could claim to be "living better overall" than another. Denmark and France could make plausible claims to be "better overall" than the US.

Og
 
Happy Birthday America! :D

Our founding documents elucidate rather clearly what the intents of the founders were, ie: forming a new nation unlike any other in the world then and now; a nation of laws and precepts, not of the divine rights of kings and landed noblemen. A country where everyone could breathe free and chart their own destiny untrammeled by the whims of his 'betters'.

Much has been made of the facts that slavery, indentured servitude, male chauvinisim, etc. existed and were not mentioned when the founding documents were drafted, thereby deeming them hypocritical and not true to their words. Let us not forget that the language of the documents were considered quite radical for the times and slavery, et al was relatively commonplace and socially acceptable throughout Colonial America and the world. The founders didn't possess the glory of our enlightened hindsight.

We will always have the carpers, complainers, nitpickers and hairsplitters among us who choose to denigrate our founders and the country they created while enjoying the freedoms they bequeathed to us of future generations. To them I say rave on and revel your right to do so, you wouldn't dare to be so free with your petty critiques in many other countries in the world.

Happy Fourth of July everyone. :D
 
From "Bicentennial Man" with Robin Williams, I paraphrase:

"Wars has been fought and millions of lives lost over this one word, 'freedom'..."

Pure, the cynic and Obbgashan, the Apologist, are both necessary ingredients in the continuing struggle to fully realize the unalienable rights of man to live and liberty.

Just as a needle is necessary for an immunization, one need not hold affection for it.

:)

Amicus...the American
 
Last edited:
From "Bicentennial Man" with Robin Williams, I paraphrase:

"Wars has been fought and millions of lives lost over this one word, 'freedom'..."

Pure, the cynic and Obbgashan, the Apologist, are both necessary ingredients in the continuing struggle to fully realize the unalienable rights of man to live and liberty.

Just as a needle is necessary for an immunization, one need not hold affectiion for it.

:)

Amicus...the American

Happy Birthday to the United States.

Thank you for your sacrifices for the freedom of Europe, to restore the rights of life and liberty to that continent.

I'm sorry, Amicus, that "inalienable liberty" is still only an aspiration in large parts of the world despite the magnificent and continuing efforts of the US and its allies.

As many Americans have said, the rights to life and liberty have to be paid for in blood. They have been, many times, and are still being paid in Afghanistan today.

"Inalienable"? In the 20th Century Hitler, the USSR, China showed and other countries show today that rights to life and liberty are too easily taken away.

Og
 
That sounds confusing. Shouldn't they be Founding Mothers?

~~~

I may have misquoted, but the intent is clear in Beck's presentation, that there were other 'Founders' than old white men, at that time in Pre Revolutionary history. The focus of his program included women and blacks as being instrumental in forming the concept for a new nation, and as Beck pointed out, are not taught in history classes.

New Jersey, said Beck, allowed women to vote before any other Colony; many Northern slave owners freed their slaves before there ever was a Constitution. I have not personally read these histories, but the source material was referenced and anyone that chooses may pursue the information.

Amicus
 
Happy Birthday to the United States.

Thank you for your sacrifices for the freedom of Europe, to restore the rights of life and liberty to that continent.

I'm sorry, Amicus, that "inalienable liberty" is still only an aspiration in large parts of the world despite the magnificent and continuing efforts of the US and its allies.

As many Americans have said, the rights to life and liberty have to be paid for in blood. They have been, many times, and are still being paid in Afghanistan today.

"Inalienable"? In the 20th Century Hitler, the USSR, China showed and other countries show today that rights to life and liberty are too easily taken away.


Og

~~~

Dear Og, although I do not completely understand the totality of your post, it gave rise to a perspective and context I offer to share.

The World is but two generations into the Satellite and Computer age, about a hundred years or three generations into automobiles and air travel, another added generation or so to include electricity.

You and I and some others are of an age to recognize that individual human life is indeed transitory; we are also of an age mellow enough to contemplate the lasting effect some individuals and ideas have had and continue to have in the universal quest for human freedom and dignity.

Like it or not, many of us are in the process of relinquishing the influence, greater or smaller, that once we had in affairs close and near.

That may sound similar to the thematic approach of the environmentalist movement, those 'save the earth' for future generations mentality, I assure you, it is quite different.

The essential defining characteristic of the quest for human freedom permits and encourages environmental consciousness but as a 'derived' concept, not a seminal one. The fault in the environmental movement that I continually make reference to, is that it is not a seminal or fundamental one, and that it tends to sacrifice the individual vision for the collective and claims a righteous certainty in its' efforts.

It becomes an tangled web when one observes that a great majority of all literature and film is involved with a battle between the greedy industrialist or developer who is determined to swallow up individual property of the 'mom & pop' operation to create a 'Walmart' type, heartless corporation.

In a writerly stance, I suggest a quick survey or literature over the past century and more, and an observation that the preferred agenda is the marginal ethical and moral behavior, fringe behavior that challenges the traditional and conventional.

That may have been and still may be considered 'courageous' and cutting edge, but I suggest the total accumulation of the weight of the literature has virtually left a world without solid guidance in moral and ethical issues.

If one writes for public consumption, perhaps the time has come to provide that public with a less revolutionary concept as it applies to human actions that have consequences down the future twisting trail of history.

Amicus
 
On the wall of my living room hang three framed documents.

To the left is a copy of the Declaration of Independance.

To the right is a copy of the Bill of Rights.

In the center is a copy of our Wedding License.
(Yes my wife and I got married on Independance Day. Chalk it up to either a sense of humor or a sense of Patriotism on the part of a First Generation American.)

Oh and yes we were out and about to catch the Fireworks yesterday even though it rained.

Cat
 
On the wall of my living room hang three framed documents.

To the left is a copy of the Declaration of Independance.

To the right is a copy of the Bill of Rights.

In the center is a copy of our Wedding License.
(Yes my wife and I got married on Independance Day. Chalk it up to either a sense of humor or a sense of Patriotism on the part of a First Generation American.)

Oh and yes we were out and about to catch the Fireworks yesterday even though it rained.

Cat

Congrats on your wedding anniversary, cat, and many more happy ones to come.

I can't help but raise an eyebrow at the irony of a man being married on Independence Day. ;)
 
Thank you all.

Tex it is a bit of a contradiction but there you have my sense of humor as well as my patriotism.

I love this country as I love my wife. I would fight for both of them. Just as I would fight for the rights of any who are oppresed. (I have the scars to prove this.)

I am however not a purely political animal. I have my schedule of values and maybe this I am purely an American. I will fight for in this order:

My Wife
My family
My country
Myself

Then again I have a somewhat out moded sense of honor.

Cat
 
Back
Top